Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Rocket River, Mar 10, 2012.
try 250+ pages and over 5000 posts.
With all the reports of TM having traces of THC in his system well well it turns out GZ was the one on a drug that cause hallucinations and aggressiveness.http://newsone.com/2016433/george-zimmerman-drugs/
It seems that GZ was going to buy drugs from TM, but when TM didn't have the drugs, GZ chased him and shot him.
THis must be the case - as we are applying bigtexx logic after all.
i must agree with you on that one Bt does seem to think along those lines.
Bigtexxx is a genius.
Biased? You do know that is an extremely rare side effect, right? Just another red herring.
I think that was the point. Just like the idea that TM was out looking for a drug deal. They are both red herrings.
So is aggressiveness from smoking weed
So why stoop to that level? If evidence comes up that GZ had a history of horrible med side effects or some one steps forward stating Martin was in the middle of a drug deal, then we will revisit it.
Instead it is just red herrings. Neither guy was a model citizen.
Too bad tossing out absurdities like you're doing just shows weakness in your argument and defensiveness. Evidence that you've lost the argument.
Hmmmm....very ironic there sir...as me thinks you are the one on the defensive....attacking like a caged animal?
All I am doing bt is taking your line of logic and extending it to this new report. If you think that's absurd...well, I think you need to have a moment of self-reflection...and yes, I am saying, there is a mirror for ya somewhere.
For the record someone on this bbs did come forward with the idea that Martin was in the middle of a drug deal.
no more absurd than you saying TM was on a drug buy.
Still does not answer my question, why throw red herrings out if you do not have a bias or agenda?
The only reason I could think of, would be to counter bias toward one side and even it out.
I agree that there is no reason for any red herrings.
dude really there were serveral people who biased or had a agenda when it was shown that Martin had traces of THC in his system where they biased as well.
I'm more than a little confused as to why conservatives are defending a criminal like George Zimmerman.
...just as confused why liberals are being the judge, jury and executioner on a man who has yet appear in court.
criminal? what crime has he been convicted of?