1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

You know how I know Disney is lazy? They use templates!

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by vstexas09, Apr 6, 2009.

  1. RKREBORN

    RKREBORN Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    10,586
    Likes Received:
    11,844
    Meh. Still would hit Snow White...
     
  2. droxford

    droxford Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    Disney made a plush, beautiful classic film in 1959 with Sleeping Beauty

    After that, Disney started to cut costs and reduced their animation staff from over 500 people, to under 100.

    To produce movies in faster time and at lower costs, Disney started using xerography in their animation. That new technology directly resulted in scratchy outline styles on the animated images. Also, animators were used to providing only sketchy drawings - cleanup was previously done when the drawings were transferred to the cells. With the new process, such cleanup did not occur. With the hand inkers gone, the animation remained as the animators drew it - sketchy.

    Disney's next animated movie came out two years later: 101 Dalmations.

    Regardless of popularity, the animation quality was complete crap compared to previous Disney releases (especially notice the backgrounds - they're terrible).

    In '63 Disney came out with The Sword in the Stone with equally crappy quality.

    In '66 Walt Disney died of lung cancer. Before he died, he did not like the changes that had been made after Sleeping Beauty.

    Disney continued to crank out crappy quality:

    Jungle Book - 1967
    Aristocats - 170
    Robin Hood - 173
    The Many Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh - 177

    All were sketchy, sloppy, had bad backgrounds and admittedly used clips from other films.

    After this, Disney augmented staff a bit and started to pay a little more attention to quality.

    The Rescuers came out in 1977, and was a slight improvement
    Fox and the Hound came out in 1981 and was another slight step in the right direction.

    As Disney started to come out with more animated films (The Black Cauldron - 1985, The Great Mouse Detective - 1986, Oliver & Company - 1988), their quality gradually improved.

    But for me, that period from the late 60's through the 70's was just a rotten time for Disney animation quality.
     
     
  3. STIX

    STIX Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    4
    Wow! I never noticed :eek:
    Damn if only my laziness could bring me billions.
     
  4. Rocketeer

    Rocketeer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 1999
    Messages:
    3,189
    Likes Received:
    1,628
    If anyone knows a little bit about screenwriting, you will find out that about %70 of movies are based off of another "successful" film.
     
  5. vstexas09

    vstexas09 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    10,166
    Likes Received:
    540
    if the movies you mentioned had crappy quality, why is it that they found a lot of success than the ones made in the 70s and 80s??
     
  6. Steve_Francis_rules

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 1999
    Messages:
    8,467
    Likes Received:
    300
    The animation quality may have been sub-par, but The Sword in the Stone, The Jungle Book, and Robin Hood are, IMO, three of the best Disney movies, if not the best.
     
  7. eveluvsrox

    eveluvsrox Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    2,438
    Likes Received:
    79
    yeah wow
    that music made me want to hang myself
    disney how dare you do this to me :mad:
     
  8. MoBalls

    MoBalls Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,420
    Likes Received:
    101
    The Ho dance....

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4nOVggxZPL0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4nOVggxZPL0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/O7AuQKFlhXI&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/O7AuQKFlhXI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
     
  9. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    "Crappy quality" animation doesn't mean the movies didn't appeal to the target audience. A movie can have used cheaper animation processes and still end up as a movie that people enjoy watching.
     
  10. Supermac34

    Supermac34 President, Von Wafer Fan Club

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,110
    Likes Received:
    2,457
    I agree with some of the cost cutting, time saving comments. Pre Sleeping Beauty Disney animation is basically moving works of art. After that, we went through a series of cheaper animation (even if the movie itself is great).

    Beauty in the Beast was a return to quality animation and was the first in a string of great animated movies and really was a resurgence for Disney for a while.

    I actually think the Beauty and the Beast dance scene that mirrors the Sleeping Beauty dance scene is more of a purposeful homage to Sleeping Beauty and not a cut corner.
     
  11. droxford

    droxford Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    Yeah. How popular has Hanna Barbera been with their crappy animation?!

    Crappy animation does not necessarily translate to crappy movie or show (look at South Park).

    &nbsp;
     
  12. fmullegun

    fmullegun Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    23
    "Pre Sleeping Beauty"? Sleeping Beauty animation was awesome, you seriously think that was poorly done?
     
  13. droxford

    droxford Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2001
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    2,131
    I think he meant to include Sleeping Beauty.
    &nbsp;
     
    1 person likes this.
  14. Supermac34

    Supermac34 President, Von Wafer Fan Club

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,110
    Likes Received:
    2,457
    Yes, I meant to include Sleeping Beauty, sorry for the confusion.

    Sleeping Beauty is a work of art.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now