btw, I just did a quick search online, and the contract figure seems to be a bit less than I remembered. here are the search results: Nike signed LBJ to a 90 million contract Nike signed Kobe to a 8-9 million per contract from 04 to 07, making it somewhere between $30 million-$40 millnion in total (I'm not sure whether this figure includes all the conditional bonuses or not). so LBJ + 2/3 of Kobe comes to a bit less than $120 million. Reebok had a offer of about 40%, which comes to about $50 million. by turning down Nike's 2nd offer, Yao turned down at least $70 million in sponsorships, not to mention the added requirement of 3 all star appearances in the next 7 years. -- so yes, I'm sticking to my original point, which is you'd better believe that there was something REALLY wrong to piss off Yao like that.
I dunno, shoe contracts, the NBA everything. It's a business. If he and his lawyers were smart enough to see through the loophole, then great. That's when a good lawyer points out the error in the contract, goes back to the other side and says unacceptable and you fix the contract so that both sides agree on it. You just don't walk away from that kind of money. Every company I have ever dealt with writes contracts that favor themselves. This why I can't believe he just walked away from that kind of money. Just fix the contract and everything should have been fine.
I am sorry, but have a hard time believing nike would offer more for yao then lebron. When I was in Asia, I saw more lebron commercials and billboards than yao stuff.
Care to explain the 70,000 earlier? Why not just donate 2 millions to begin with instead of getting all the criticisms then donate the right amount. Maybe he does care about his money and turning down that huge contract from Nike was a huge mistake....
that offer was widely reported when yao turned down nike, including multiple sources that cited yao himself. Unless there's some other contradictory evidences, I don't see how the validity of this report should be doubted. further more, yao is with reebok and lebron is with nike at the end of the day. the fact that Lebron has more commercials NOW does not prove they would not value Yao as much if he signed with Nike. and remember that offer was a desperation offer, proposed under special circumstances. At the time, Nike had to over-bid in order to persuade a pissed off Yao, and staffs in Nike Asia was trying everything in their power to cover their own asses. -- you can bet that people were fired because of the first blunder after Yao signed with Reebok.
wow... I mean... wow... I know I shouldn't try to respond to this, but I'll try to ignore my better part of sense and actually lay out some obvious facts... Yao's reaction to the earth quake was extremely quick. IIRC, he announced his donation less than 12 hours after the quake hit -- he's definitely among the first ones to make humanitarian relief commitments. At THAT time, nobody expected the quake to be as disastrous because it hit a relatively unpopulated part of China. AFAIK, 4 hours after the earth quake, everyone was saying this is a bad disaster. the death toll could exceed well over 1,000 if we are unlucky. about 12 hours after the quake, when the casualty in Beichuan was reported in, people started to get concerned and was saying "omg, we might have more than 10,000 casualties after all are said and done". What's the official death toll now? 60,000+ plus several thousand more still missing? -- I haven't kept up with the number, but nobody, NOONE, expected the quake to be this disastrous. pledging $70,000 relief fund at the very first hours shows how much Yao is concerned with his fellow people, not a reason to bash him because nobody expected it to be so serious. As the damage started to be counted and people starts to realize how horrible it was, Yao followed up and readjusted his donations. There's simply no way anyone should have anything bad to say about Yao, when it comes to humanitarian efforts. Whoever is not satisfied about what he has done is either blind or pathetic. really.
I tried doing a google search (english ) and none of those Ive seen mentions of Yao going to reebok coz he felt cheated or that Yao (without citing reasons ) chose to go with reebok even if Nike had a bigger offer. It all seemed that Nike could not or chose to not match Reebok's offfer coz of the large money they already put out for lebron , Melo and Kobe.
back in 2002 when yao was preparing for the Draft , Nike offered to tear up the last year of his contract with nike ( 4 yr 200,000 ) and give him a new 4 year 1,600,000 ) deal which team yao rejected. Nike never did much to promote their association with Yao in his Rookie year, no yao shoes or apparel and even ads wer sparse That 4 yr 1.6million offer was a joke at roughly 400,000 only a year. Heck Nike gave the bulls 3rd pick Jay Williams a deal worth about 750,000 a year ( jay was also represented by BDA sports ) Maybe this is where Yao started to get pissed at Nike for offering him such a low ball contract. But how can you blame Nike for not trying because they know that Yao even when his contract expires in 2003, Yao cant just sign with a different brand coz Yao's 99 contract with Nike stipulates that Nike had a right to match clause meaning that even if other brands offer a bigger deal , all Nike had to do was match it and Yao must resign with them. Not knowing Yao would sign for a lower deal just to get away from them ( this is just my theory here ) so the right to match clause could not apply .
sucks yao didn't go with nike. nike commercials are killer; i want to see some awesome nike commercials about yao!
I like Nike's clothes and shoes. Maybe after all those foot injuries Yao should change exchange reebok for nike. maybe
Nikes VS Reebok By Chris Tidwell, published May 09, 2007 Published Content: 129 Total Views: 72,628 Favorited By: 4 CPs Contact Subscribe Add to Favorites Rating: 3.4 of 5Currently 3.40/512345 Font Font I myself am an avid runner, and as anyone who runs frequently will tell you your shoes are going to be very important. Reebok and Nike are two very popular shoe brands that have close ties to outdoor sports and activates in general, but which shoe is overall better? Nike is probably regarded as the most well balanced and athletic shoe around, but sometimes advertising can be misleading as we all know. Nike shoes are great for running, walking, and so on, but the shoes themselves seem to run a bit wide and will squish when you walk. This is great for casual wear, but when you're running or walking it can be very uncomfortable and dangerous. A loose fitting shoe, or one that slides or squishes will tend to give the wearer blisters around the heal causing unneeded pain and discomfort. Reebok shoes fit like a glove to your feet, if you buy the correct size. This is ideal for running or walking because the shoe will still offer protection, but you hardly realize you're wearing it because of it snug fit. Arch support is a big factor when running and in this category Nike is the clear winner. Nike shoes have amazing arch support and will put a bit of spring into your step. This will ensure that after a long day of working out, running track, your back will not suffer as much if you're wearing a good pair of Nike's Reebok's also have fairly good arch support, but after you have had the shoe for about a week you'll see a decline in the support they offer. Reeboks are still much better then any other competitor except for Nike in terms of arch support, but still the extra support that Nike offers may be enough to sway you towards buying them over Reeboks. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/238389/nikes_vs_reebok.html
Oh and found this video on Nike vs Reebok It's pretty funny if nothing else than entertainment value. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xhiyDQNmEjY&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xhiyDQNmEjY&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
er... i don't know if u got his point...he did say "JOBS for Chinese CHILDREN" that's y he said "dont ban him"