1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Yao turned down more money from Nike

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by poprocks, Jun 13, 2008.

  1. ty185

    ty185 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    656
    Likes Received:
    50
    btw, I just did a quick search online, and the contract figure seems to be a bit less than I remembered. here are the search results:

    Nike signed LBJ to a 90 million contract
    Nike signed Kobe to a 8-9 million per contract from 04 to 07, making it somewhere between $30 million-$40 millnion in total (I'm not sure whether this figure includes all the conditional bonuses or not).

    so LBJ + 2/3 of Kobe comes to a bit less than $120 million.
    Reebok had a offer of about 40%, which comes to about $50 million.

    by turning down Nike's 2nd offer, Yao turned down at least $70 million in sponsorships, not to mention the added requirement of 3 all star appearances in the next 7 years.

    -- so yes, I'm sticking to my original point, which is you'd better believe that there was something REALLY wrong to piss off Yao like that. :)
     
  2. poprocks

    poprocks Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dunno, shoe contracts, the NBA everything. It's a business. If he and his lawyers were smart enough to see through the loophole, then great. That's when a good lawyer points out the error in the contract, goes back to the other side and says unacceptable and you fix the contract so that both sides agree on it. You just don't walk away from that kind of money. Every company I have ever dealt with writes contracts that favor themselves. This why I can't believe he just walked away from that kind of money. Just fix the contract and everything should have been fine.
     
  3. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,940
    Likes Received:
    6,694
    I am sorry, but have a hard time believing nike would offer more for yao then lebron. When I was in Asia, I saw more lebron commercials and billboards than yao stuff.
     
  4. ekim

    ekim Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,297
    Likes Received:
    0
    Care to explain the 70,000 earlier? Why not just donate 2 millions to begin with instead of getting all the criticisms then donate the right amount.

    Maybe he does care about his money and turning down that huge contract from Nike was a huge mistake....
     
  5. ty185

    ty185 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    656
    Likes Received:
    50
    that offer was widely reported when yao turned down nike, including multiple sources that cited yao himself. Unless there's some other contradictory evidences, I don't see how the validity of this report should be doubted.

    further more, yao is with reebok and lebron is with nike at the end of the day. the fact that Lebron has more commercials NOW does not prove they would not value Yao as much if he signed with Nike. :)

    and remember that offer was a desperation offer, proposed under special circumstances. At the time, Nike had to over-bid in order to persuade a pissed off Yao, and staffs in Nike Asia was trying everything in their power to cover their own asses. -- you can bet that people were fired because of the first blunder after Yao signed with Reebok.
     
  6. ty185

    ty185 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    656
    Likes Received:
    50

    wow... I mean... wow...

    I know I shouldn't try to respond to this, but I'll try to ignore my better part of sense and actually lay out some obvious facts...

    Yao's reaction to the earth quake was extremely quick. IIRC, he announced his donation less than 12 hours after the quake hit -- he's definitely among the first ones to make humanitarian relief commitments. At THAT time, nobody expected the quake to be as disastrous because it hit a relatively unpopulated part of China.

    AFAIK, 4 hours after the earth quake, everyone was saying this is a bad disaster. the death toll could exceed well over 1,000 if we are unlucky.

    about 12 hours after the quake, when the casualty in Beichuan was reported in, people started to get concerned and was saying "omg, we might have more than 10,000 casualties after all are said and done".

    What's the official death toll now? 60,000+ plus several thousand more still missing? -- I haven't kept up with the number, but nobody, NOONE, expected the quake to be this disastrous.

    pledging $70,000 relief fund at the very first hours shows how much Yao is concerned with his fellow people, not a reason to bash him because nobody expected it to be so serious.

    As the damage started to be counted and people starts to realize how horrible it was, Yao followed up and readjusted his donations.

    There's simply no way anyone should have anything bad to say about Yao, when it comes to humanitarian efforts. Whoever is not satisfied about what he has done is either blind or pathetic. really.
     
  7. sab504

    sab504 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Too bad yao didnt take Nike's offer. He could of given more than 2 million to his homeland.
     
  8. albert57d

    albert57d Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0

    I tried doing a google search (english ) and none of those Ive seen mentions of Yao going to reebok coz he felt cheated or that Yao (without citing reasons ) chose to go with reebok even if Nike had a bigger offer. It all seemed that Nike could not or chose to not match Reebok's offfer coz of the large money they already put out for lebron , Melo and Kobe.
     
  9. albert57d

    albert57d Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    back in 2002 when yao was preparing for the Draft , Nike offered to tear up the last year of his contract with nike ( 4 yr 200,000 ) and give him a new
    4 year 1,600,000 ) deal which team yao rejected. Nike never did much to promote their association with Yao in his Rookie year, no yao shoes or apparel and even ads wer sparse

    That 4 yr 1.6million offer was a joke at roughly 400,000 only a year. Heck Nike gave the bulls 3rd pick Jay Williams a deal worth about 750,000 a year ( jay was also represented by BDA sports ) Maybe this is where Yao started to get pissed at Nike for offering him such a low ball contract. But how can you blame Nike for not trying because they know that Yao even when his contract expires in 2003, Yao cant just sign with a different brand coz Yao's 99 contract with Nike stipulates that Nike had a right to match clause meaning that even if other brands offer a bigger deal , all Nike had to do was match it and Yao must resign with them. Not knowing Yao would sign for a lower deal just to get away from them ( this is just my theory here ) so the right to match clause could not apply .
     
  10. The Brian

    The Brian Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,335
    Likes Received:
    4
    sucks yao didn't go with nike.

    nike commercials are killer; i want to see some awesome nike commercials about yao! :D
     
  11. BroadwayBelm

    BroadwayBelm Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2007
    Messages:
    866
    Likes Received:
    2

    So true, it bothers me this hasn't been discussed more.
     
  12. Jeff Who

    Jeff Who Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    41
    I like Nike's clothes and shoes. Maybe after all those foot injuries Yao should change exchange reebok for nike. maybe
     
  13. poprocks

    poprocks Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nikes VS Reebok

    By Chris Tidwell, published May 09, 2007
    Published Content: 129 Total Views: 72,628 Favorited By: 4 CPs
    Contact Subscribe Add to Favorites
    Rating: 3.4 of 5Currently 3.40/512345 Font Font
    I myself am an avid runner, and as anyone who runs frequently will tell you your shoes are going to be very important. Reebok and Nike are two very popular shoe brands that have close ties to outdoor sports and activates in general, but which shoe is overall better?

    Nike is probably regarded as the most well balanced and athletic shoe around, but sometimes advertising can be misleading as we all know. Nike shoes are great for running, walking, and so on, but the shoes themselves seem to run a bit wide and will squish when you walk. This is great for casual wear, but when you're running or walking it can be very uncomfortable and dangerous. A loose fitting shoe, or one that slides or squishes will tend to give the wearer blisters around the heal causing unneeded pain and discomfort.

    Reebok shoes fit like a glove to your feet, if you buy the correct size. This is ideal for running or walking because the shoe will still offer protection, but you hardly realize you're wearing it because of it snug fit.

    Arch support is a big factor when running and in this category Nike is the clear winner. Nike shoes have amazing arch support and will put a bit of spring into your step. This will ensure that after a long day of working out, running track, your back will not suffer as much if you're wearing a good pair of Nike's

    Reebok's also have fairly good arch support, but after you have had the shoe for about a week you'll see a decline in the support they offer. Reeboks are still much better then any other competitor except for Nike in terms of arch support, but still the extra support that Nike offers may be enough to sway you towards buying them over Reeboks.

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/238389/nikes_vs_reebok.html
     
  14. poprocks

    poprocks Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh and found this video on Nike vs Reebok

    It's pretty funny if nothing else than entertainment value.

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xhiyDQNmEjY&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xhiyDQNmEjY&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
     
  15. dlite316

    dlite316 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,755
    Likes Received:
    1,088
    that news is years old...
     
  16. silentsky

    silentsky Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    er... i don't know if u got his point...he did say "JOBS for Chinese CHILDREN" that's y he said "dont ban him"
     

Share This Page