1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Y! Sports] Bucks-Warriors trade

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by J.R., Jun 22, 2010.

  1. Pete Chilcutt

    Pete Chilcutt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,535
    Likes Received:
    280
    Seems as if Salmons saying he is opting out may have had a part to do with this..
     
  2. daeyeth

    daeyeth Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    28
    Um, what the heck? I don't understand this move AT ALL from the Warriors. Can someone break this down for me? Because Maggette was practically about 40% of their scoring before he got injured and Curry broke out. TradeMachine tells me he only costs 8M while Gazuric and Bell cost 9M, and they're pretty useless in comparison to Maggette's production.

    If it's an age + contract thing, then I can understand. Are Gazuric and Bell expiring contracts and how many years left did Magette have left on his?
     
  3. BasketballReasons

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,045
    Likes Received:
    237
  4. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    114,379
    Likes Received:
    177,380
    chadfordinsider

    Bucks also get 44th pick (the one Portland just traded them) in the deal. Saves GS about $15 million. Salmons unlikely to return to Mil
     
  5. daeyeth

    daeyeth Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    28
    Alright, that makes sense, 15M, especially since Maggette is 30 and the Warriors aren't going anywhere for a while. Tank time yet again for the 20th season in a row.
     
  6. Landry92

    Landry92 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    12
    Its a risky move but the bucks could hit the jackpot .. and imagine if they add someone else in the next free agency theyll be the team to beat ..

    Imagine the bucks ..
     
  7. ryano2009

    ryano2009 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    7,889
    Likes Received:
    5,401
    great move by the bucks, next year they'll have solid starting line-up.
     
  8. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    5,355
    The Bucks won't have any cap room this summer (less than the MLE, so they'll just keep the MLE instead), and this actually causes them to have LESS cap room in 2011 (Maggette's 2011-12 salary is significantly higher than Charlie Bell's), but the Bucks will still have a good amount of room in 2011, anyway.

    I like this deal for both teams, financially speaking. The Bucks save a little money in the short-term (and add the better player) at the expense of having less cap room in 2011 and having to pay Maggette $10.9M in 2012-13.

    Meanwhile, the Warriors get out from under Maggette's deal before they have to deal with new contracts for their young guys. (Remember, both C.J. Watson and Anthony Morrow are restricted free agents this summer, followed by Brandan Wright and Ronnie Turiaf [unrestricted, if he opts out] next summer, and then Anthony Randolph in 2012.)

    Also, if he's healthy, I can almost guarantee that Charlie Bell is playing serious minutes at SF for Nellie next season. :grin:
     
  9. JayGoogle

    JayGoogle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    52,324
    Likes Received:
    45,192
    Maggette is and has always been a blackhole. There is a reason why guys like him and Randolph go from team to team despite putting u pgood numbers. He breaks up team chemistry and the Warriors have been trying to get rid of the guy reportedly since they got him. I'm sure the Bucks will too unless Maggette finally plays within a team like Randolph has and maybe the Bucks coach (name slips me atm) can do that for him as Nellie's system definitely doesn't help build team chemistry or structure.
     
  10. zainahsan93

    zainahsan93 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    6
    Wow bell and gaduric freakin suck. And they get magetti
     
  11. roksoer

    roksoer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    70
    the thing is, the bucks desperately need offense and that's exactly what spaggette brings, highly efficient offense
     
  12. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,441
    Likes Received:
    40,013
    Well played my good man, well played.

    DD
     
  13. H-Town Rockets Guy

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    468
    Maggette is still a very good scorer but not worth his salary ofcourse. He is injury prone but he can still find the free throw line. It is a good move for the Bucks.

    Warriors just gave him away for basically nothing. Maybe they just want to clean house and start rebuilding around Stephen Curry.
     
  14. asmith8266

    asmith8266 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    307
    Absolutely horrible trade for the Warriors.

    Savvy move by Bucks. They desperately need a player who can get his own shot and doesn't play point guard.
     
  15. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,520
    Likes Received:
    19,661
    this made my day.
     
  16. Juxtaposed Jolt

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    20,828
    Likes Received:
    16,639
    Why wouldn't Salmons reconsider going back to the Bucks?

    Jennings
    Salmons
    Maggette
    Thomas
    Bogut

    Seriously solid lineup.
     
  17. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    That trade does absolutely nothing for either team on the court.
     

Share This Page