1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Would u trade up for #2 pick to get Von Miller?

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by woodtee, Mar 21, 2011.

  1. woodtee

    woodtee Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    27
    Well we can fill holes by getting quality starters! One quality starter is a hundred times better than three players sitting on the bench!

    Also, let's trade down with our second rounder to add extra picks then go best available with those. I hate always "reaching" and drafting for need! I want to go for starter material, not just depth. draft only players to challenge for the starters' job and let them all fight it out! Don't guarantee Kareem a starting spot! Tell him it's on the line and he has to work hard for it!
     
  2. woodtee

    woodtee Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    27
    Thanks Phillyrocket! I think you are the smartest one here.
     
  3. robroy77

    robroy77 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2002
    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    57
    I think staying pat and having a chance at Robert Quinn could work out great for us! If he played this year, he probably would be a top 5 pick! The only thing that might interest me is trading to number 7 with the 49ers. Recent mocks on NFL.com have Peterson lasting until the 7th pick. If that happens things could get interesting. The 49ers need a cb and even though Peterson is a better pick than Amakumara, alot of teams apparently have them pretty close. If Houston is one and Prince might last to us we might stay pat, but if he is there at 7 and the 49ers value Prince alot, they might be the perfect trading partner. We are gonna get a 3rd round compensation pick for the loss of Dunta, and that could come in very handy. Maybe our 1st, 3rd, and 5th to move to 7 and get Peterson! Sounds like alot to give up, and Quinn and Amakumara would be great, but Peterson is just that damn good to make the move!
     
  4. jev5555

    jev5555 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Messages:
    4,354
    Likes Received:
    2,015
    Too high a price. Anything can happen. Injuries or more bad luck. With Andrew Luck coming out in 2012 I won't take that gamble.
     
  5. jdh008

    jdh008 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,778
    Likes Received:
    125
    No way. I think Von is the best OLB/DE prospect in the draft, but I'm not sure he's worth the #2 pick along with whatever we would have to give up to move up. There are a ton of other OLB/DE pass rushers in this draft, the Quinn kid first among them. There's no need to move.
     
  6. No Worries

    No Worries Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    32,762
    Likes Received:
    20,517
    The Texans would be overpaying for Von Miller. Next year's first round pick is the deal breaker.

    I would not mind moving up using this year's first and third pick, depending of whom they could get with that the higher pick. IIRC the Texans have a comp third round pick this year and thus a third round pick to give up.
     
  7. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    i love Von but i think that is too much to give up for the texans.
     
  8. Joe Joe

    Joe Joe Go Stros!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Messages:
    26,304
    Likes Received:
    16,629
    No, No, and No. The Texans need players. I could possibly see giving up two pick to move up, but two three high picks...No.
     
  9. Dubious

    Dubious Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,318
    Likes Received:
    5,090
    There is no way you can predict that Von Miller will be an all-pro level player but Robert Quinn will not. That proposed deal is too costly, even though it is about right on the draft trade charts.
     
  10. BP0803

    BP0803 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    5
    You only make that deal if you believe your team is one special player away from competing for a championship. As we all know there are several holes the Texans need to fill, and they have already shown they don't want to do that through free agency. There is no way they should make a deal like that.
     
  11. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,526
    Likes Received:
    5,526
    Absolutely. It's beyond time for this team to show some urgency, especially in a year in which free agency might be severely compromised. Besides, a first round pick next year had better be in the 20s, anyway, or you're not going to get a chance to use it, so why not roll the dice? It’s a big-time move for your franchise:

    There's the "local" connection: Miller is a PR win for a team mired in PR disasters. You're telling me the fan base wouldn't be jacked up for Von Miller after watching him wreak havoc 90 miles away last fall? Plus, you have access and insight into this guy that no other staff will have because of your connection to Sherman, who will know if the guy is worth the #2 pick. You can greatly reduce the likelihood of error that way.

    And assuming you've crossed your i's and dotted your t's, scouting-wise, and convinced yourself he won't bust because of apathy and/or distractions, etc., then you've made an historically horrible part of your team instantly better. While not easy, stepping in and excelling as an OLB is much easier in the NFL than stepping in and excelling as a CB. Trading up to get a guy who'll need a month+ to get up to NFL speed is stupid. Miller will step in with one fundamentally easy task: Go tackle *that* guy.

    To me, it's a no-brainer if that's available.
     
  12. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,761
    Likes Received:
    3,699
    not for a linebacker, we get cushings and ryans with later picks
     
  13. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    Great teams in the NFL trade down. They don't trade up. That is all.
     
  14. ipaman

    ipaman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    13,207
    Likes Received:
    8,045
    i thought your supposed to be able to find monster LB's low in the draft and off the street when you play the 3-4?
     
  15. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,383
    Likes Received:
    9,290
    We're going to keep "building through the draft" since it's served us SO well up to now. After all, that's what the Steelers do!

    Look, weslinder....we've just got to continue to get better.

    Seriously, I still say trade DOWN for extra picks to use for depth only. Then try and acquire an already-established OLB and CB. At some point, we have to stop perpetually looking toward the future and start looking at the present. Our star players aren't getting any younger.
     
  16. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    You make some good points but a couple of things..

    if FA is severely compromised, why limit the amount of players you can get in the draft?

    Our first round pick this year "had better been" in the 20s...and looked how that turned out.

    Showing urgency, or desperation, isnt necessarily a good reason to do something drastic.

    and this team has not done "historically horrible" at drafting LBs. In fact, it's been one of their few strong areas
     
  17. Fyreball

    Fyreball Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    15,163
    Likes Received:
    12,812
    I guess if they pull the trigger on this, the implication is that we will address the secondary through free agency?? What are the guarantees that a DB even COMES to Houston this off-season?? I understand that this regime probably feels the flames of the hot seat now, and they are getting desperate to make something work, but I wouldn't allow them to mortgage the future like this unless there's some sort of guarantee that they will be able to address the other needs this team has through free agency. And since there is no communication with players right now, it stands to reason there is no way of knowing what any potential target of ours wants to do. That risk is far too great for me to allow this staff to start trading away first round picks.
     
  18. pugsly8422

    pugsly8422 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,265
    Likes Received:
    349
    No way in hell I would do this. 2 1st rounders and a 3rd? That is way too much. I'm fine with going with what we have, or, if there is an impact player they rate high, spending less to move up, just not quite as much.

    To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see a deal like this go through. Why? Because our staff is on the cusp and need to have a good draft. What is the best way for this to happen? Draft a sure thing, or as close to it as possible, and that is what Von Miller is. They'll worry about next year next year, and that's assuming they're still around. All that matters is drafting well this year and keeping their jobs.

    We need help in too many places, so we need our high picks. Trade up slightly if someone is there we highly regard, stick with what we have, or even trade down to gain more picks. Do anything but break the bank to move up that far.

    Pugs
     
  19. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    Ding ding ding ding ding.

    Kubiak and Smith will be more than happy to overpay this year in order to move up if they think it lands them an impact player. If it works and the Texans make the playoffs, they've saved their jobs. If it doesn't work then they're fired and they aren't the ones that have do deal with not having a first rounder next year.
     
  20. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,526
    Likes Received:
    5,526
    Fair point. But it's one player (this year; the year of the compromised free agency) and a 3rd rounder at that. Not insignificant but I still do it every single day of the week...

    The time to hoarde over draft picks is over. This isn't a team rebuilding - this is a team that's (potentially) one or 2 players away from getting over the hump. Miller has the potential to be one of those players.

    Well, if you don't make a trade because you're afraid that pick might be in the top 10......... Again, these aren't the Astros. It's a team that should be aggressively looking for ways to get itself over the hump.

    I don't think drafting the best OLB prospect to shore up an absolute area of need is "desperate." I just don't.

    They've been historically bad at rushing the passer not drafting LBs.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now