Yeah, whenever I saw him interviewed he didn't seem very humble. Still, he was probably one of the greatest athletes of our time. It's so strange that he died relatively young(63) yet was in such great shape, even in his 50's. Congestive Heart Failure...but his heart should've been in great shape...but apparently he was having heart trouble for years before his death.
Also, he made the playoffs 13 times and his lowest playoff rebounding average was 20.2, which is incredible. (I can see the arguments about the early 1960's, but by the early 70's, the game was not that different.)
In 72-73, NBA teams averaged 50.4 rebounds per 48 minutes played. This season, they average 41.6 rebounds per 48 minutes played (17% less). In 72-73, Chamberlain averaged 18.6 rebounds, playing 43.2 minutes per game. If you reduce that by 17%, it would come down to 15.4 rebounds per 43.2 minutes. By comparison, Dwight Howard averages 13.5 rebounds, playing 35.4 mpg; so for every 43.2 minutes played, he grabs 16.5 rebounds. Chamberlain was a great rebounder, but he isn't in a different stratosphere compared to Howard, as one may be lead to believe with a naive look at the numbers.
The third pick in the 1960 draft behind Big O and Jerry was a center, a 6'10" center. In 60-61 the lakers had three centers on their roster, 6'8", 6'9" and 6'11".
I searched centers in the 60-61 season and listed them by games played. 6'8" 230 bob Ferry 6'10 205 Phil Jordan 6'9" 230 Johnny Kerr 6'8" 240 Wayne Embry 6'8" 225 Gene Conley 6'9" 215 Hub Reed 6'11" 220 Ray Felix That is 7 out of the top 10 in games played. wilt, Bill r. and another 7 footer round out the list. those are forwards in todays nba. Most of them small forards or SG's Oh yeah David Lee and chuck hayes weigh more than all of the guys I listed, so don't give me the strong argument.
Thanks for the comparison numbers. To add to your comparision, Jared Jeffries is 6'11"...240. he's bigger than ALL of them. Hell, Shane Battier is about the same size as 3 of them.
To be fair i did not mention this Shawn Bradley wanna be. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xyi1b7MZq4o&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xyi1b7MZq4o&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> Him, Russell, and Wilt rounded out the top ten in games played by centers that season. I am guessing Dwight Howard would have zero trouble getting 20 plus rebounds in that era.
Another amazing thing is that he had only 2 games all season in which he didn't get 30. That would be incredible to be able to say that you had a full season where you never scored below 30 points. And everyone's making a big deal of Durant's consecutive 25 point game streak. Wilt had a full season. lol
A few months ago, someone else here posted a similar thread about Wilt's monster statistics. That day I went to look up more detailed information about him on wikipedia. The overview of his career was an epic read : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilt_Chamberlain Truly a unique, absolute one of a kind player. Yes, Wilt was maligned and criticized for actually reaping much less success than seemed commisurate with his skill level. Apparently later in his career, a intentional focus on rebounding, defense, and teamwork served him slightly better.
I agree. Even if Wilt had played in the 80's or 90's, the best time in the league's history for big men, he would have been good enough to be recognized as an all-time great.
He just absolutely destroyed Philadelphia. The number of 60+ point 30+ rebounds against them is amazing...
It was amazing back than...I sometimes wonder what would MJ have done back than or any of the other 90's players?
I think Jordan would have averaged 40+ ppg, 8 apg, and 15 rpg, shooting 55% from the field. He would have been the league's best player, by far.