Pathetic. Trying to stay within the 'real of rational thought' I again point out that nuclear strikes would stop the Iranian nuclear program. Is that not a choice 'in real(ity)?' Seems to be a choice in 'real,' lol - or have you missed the news on Iran lately. Once again you try to dismiss offhand any response you can't handle.
Since the letter does NOT offer compromise, it has always been false. Just because you said it was a compromise (even though you HAD NOT read the letter at the time you said it was a compromise) doesn't make it so. The title of the article doesn't mention anything about "compromise" either, so I guess that is another false statement: "Ahmadinejad Proposes 'Solutions' to Bush "
Your problem isnt with me or what i said, it's with the media and I've already addressed this issue before with you
Can you please answer this question: I just wanna know, for future reference, will you stop name calling and stick to the issues instead?
It's not me: It's the media! It's the translators! It's the zionists! It's the bushy eyebrow haters! You really do yourself justice.
You said the title mentioned "compromise". It did not. You wrote that the letter contained compromise. It did not. You did not say "according to this article" or something similar. In your own words, you wrote that the letter offered a compromise. Intentionally or not, you were wrong.
solutions mean that either all or part of an issue will be settled...a compromise is a settlement in which concessions are made this is the way the letter was portrayed at the time and that is the info i was passing along so at the time, i wasn't wrong in the end, it was the media that misrepresented the contents of the letter
its his favorite propaganda tactic so he knows exactly what name-calling is and i dont think he will agree to stop using it i dont think he'll even address the question, but i hope he does
Here is a "solution" to our situation. Admit you are wrong. There, I've compromised and I am not wrong.
you will not give it up, because its your favorite tactic, i guess that's what happens when you have no argument or nothing better to say please prove me wrong though and answer the question definitively
Lol, so far zanyfloyd is 0-2 in his big challenge. Quite a record for our resident anonymous bushy eyebrow mullah loving progressive Iran expert.
I had stopped, but then you asked for anyone to cite an instance where you posted something wrong about Iran. I did. You interpreted 'solution" to mean compromise, when I easily established that the two are not the same. Futhermore, the letter proved that they weren't the same. You were wrong about the contents. Fact. You were wrong to assume that the word "solution" in the title indicated compromise. Fact You were wrong in something you posted about Iran. Fact.
you can continue with your name-calling, but you should concentrate on your iraq thread, which is where you're getting owned...haha
I'm glad you're taking my adivce and if this is the best you can do, then I'm sorry, you have no case and I've already explained why
keeping in mind no one else responded to any of these posts, bnb was right. you're getting a little........creepy.
