I don't understand that. There's a reason Mark Jackson does the big playoff games along with Mike Breen and Jeff Van Gundy. He's a good tv analyst, and he works well with that team.
I dont think Bull is a homer, I think he calls it like he sees it... Gene Peterson had to go to radio because they said he was "too biased". Hello... he works FOR the Rockets... He can be biased and in my opinion, he wasnt biased, he to, like Bull, called it like he saw it!
Clyde's commentating put me to sleep. I'd rather listen to Bull eventhough he's a homer and corny at times.
He was running at memorial yesterday around 7:30pm and was about to ask him: why aren't you in Laredo? but didn't.
Van Chancellor is the worst one. Besides his English, he constantly blamed the players for the losses, and almost never blamed the coaches. Plus that he seems to really want to please the owner and the coach by saying some ridiculous things. He was just bad in both ways.
Chancellor was very knowledgable when it came to basketball. You're statement is rather foolish, sir.
Yeah, I never understood the TOO BIASED argument. If they are the Rockets analysts, they should be and are biased. I am happy about that. Bull is very good imo. Clyde is complete garbage, if he was not a legendary player, he would have been fired a while ago.
That is just your thinking, you do not think many people have not much knowledge about the basketball. Most people just want to have entertainment.
What commentary from Clyde? It seemed every other word was "Hahahaha" Though in all honestly, I wont be mad if he does or doesnt come back.
