Wikileaks Releases Nearly 20,000 Hacked DNC Emails

Yeah I'm surprised you don't have Scarface on ignore. Terrible contributions to the board and is totally blinded by his bias.

 

Someone remind me: When does Assange plan to release his smoking gun leaks...in October?

 

February surprise!

 

Hillary is a criminal

 

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Bombshell set to hit Clinton campaign as FBI recovers 14,900 deleted emails. We will incorporate them into: <a href="https://t.co/XcH75u3kbu">https://t.co/XcH75u3kbu</a></p>&mdash; WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) <a href="https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/768090518718935041">August 23, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">US Army describes Hillary Clinton as 'Insider Threat' <a href="https://t.co/m8128z7kx4">https://t.co/m8128z7kx4</a> More: <a href="https://t.co/XcH75u3kbu">https://t.co/XcH75u3kbu</a></p>&mdash; WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) <a href="https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/768814800700858368">August 25, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

That's a hard hit by whoever made that slide. And a fair shot given her use of an under-secured server. Not fair to equate her with the other threats on the slide, though.

Army Training Lesson Cited Clinton as 'Insider' Threat Risk

An Army training presentation on insider threats included Hillary Clinton among a rogue's gallery of killers and leakers, citing the former secretary of state as an example of "careless or disgruntled employees," NBC News confirmed on Tuesday.

The unclassified slide, which first emerged on a Facebook page that spoofs the military, was confirmed by a U.S. military officials, who said it was used as part of a lesson on how to secure classified materials and improve safety.

A spokesperson from the Army's Training and Doctrine Command said the slide was developed 18 months ago.

"As is common with Army training requirements, the local unit was given latitude to develop their own training products to accomplish the overall training objective," the spokesperson said in a statement.

"This particular presentation had not been reviewed or approved by the unit's leadership, and does not reflect the position of the Army. The training presentation has since been removed."

A U.S. military official told NBC News that the slide — with a header reading "Who is the threat? Insiders" — was used at at Fort Leonard Wood in Missouri.

Clinton's camp did not respond to NBC News requests for comment on the slide.

The mention of Clinton is an apparent reference to her use of a personal email server during her time at the State Department, including the handling of secret documents. FBI Director James Comey earlier this year described her workflow as "extremely careless."

Next to Clinton on the slide is a photograph of former CIA Director and retired Army Gen. David Petraeus, who pleaded guilty in 2012 to a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified materials by sharing them with his former mistress and biographer.

Above them are pictures of Army Maj. Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 people in a 2009 gun rampage at Fort Hood, Texas; Chelsea Manning, a soldier who is serving a 35-year sentence in a military prison for sharing a trove of classified documents with WikiLeaks; Edward Snowden, a former National Security Agency contractor who has been living in exile since leaking classified documents on government surveillance; and Aaron Alexis, who killed 21 people in a shooting at the Washington Navy Yard in 2013.

 

Sure it's fair to list her with that group. She's not the most extreme example but certainly as bad as some on the list.

 

Actually she is probably the most extreme example. Many of the people on that list had an agenda to push for something greater than themselves. Hillary is willing to sacrifice the security of our nation just to cover her own @$$.

 

Trump should have a field day with that Army Presentation.

 

Considering he has nothing else. Certainly no beliefs or ideas to guide him in leading the country.

 

OH noes, so scared. Save us from corruption, Russian hackers!

 

HI - I'm a random internet male from Oklahoma, and I have something to say about Hillary Clinton.

Press 1 to continue.

 

"As is common with Army training requirements, the local unit was given latitude to develop their own training products to accomplish the overall training objective," the spokesperson said in a statement.

"This particular presentation had not been reviewed or approved by the unit's leadership, and does not reflect the position of the Army. The training presentation has since been removed."

So I fail to see why this is a big deal..... you mean someone in a local unit (not even in the power structure) doesn't like Hillary Clinton? OHH NOES!

Seriously... this is pretty damn lame.

 

Interesting that Wikileaks not only leaks secrets, but now also reports and offers analyses of other campaign-related news. And continues to pre-announce leaks to come. Seems to be taking more of a campaign/marketing approach.

Wonder whatever happened to the previously pre-announced "leak" of the Trump tax returns? Perhaps the Clinton campaign isn't paying as much as the Trump campaign?

 

So you agree, he will have a field day? Your reply was confusing.

 

Typical Hillary supporter, they know she is a lying, cheating, horrible person with no moral compass who would probably shoot them dead if it would get her the presidency but they are supporting her anyway.

Go you!

 

Ignore him, he's a Billarybot who talks like this beep beep bop beep...

 

LOL... if this was all true, you'd think republicans would be steamrolling to a landslide victory. And yet, Clinton holds a significant and growing lead, especially in battleground states, and a growing number of republicans not just rejecting their own candidate but even supporting Clinton. What does this say about you and other republicans?

So yea... go you...

 

Thanks for making my point. The "republicans" are willing to acknowledge that the candidate provided by their party is unacceptable and do the right thing by not supporting that candidate.

The Democrats don't give a crap about anything but their partisan politics.