We didn't need wiki leaks to know Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC always preferred Clinton. Bernie only had a prayer if he could actually light his political revolution. The Clinton's have built a massive machine over the years. This isn't a secret.
But the leak does out the agenda of people like Assange and Greenwald. It also further exposes the ties between Putin and Trump.
Ok, so now that we are all in agreement, just curious does this bother you? Isn't the job of the DNC to be a fair arbiter for your party?
Of course it bothers me. I'm a Bernie voter. Hillary is slime but at the end of the day the Democratic Party supports the issues most important to me and accepting all of her baggage and whatever other nonsense is unfortunately the price to be paid for that. The Republican Party has veered off into a ditch and their agenda doesn't address my concerns so there's no chance they'll get my vote.
That's interesting. Appreciate the honesty. An "ends justify the means" mindset. Thanks for the conversation.
No, I'm not justifying it. I've stated several times Clinton is shady. The entire system is rigged but I still have to make a choice.
I don't think for a lot of minorities it's blind. It's more instinctive. Too many Republicans are all kinds of shades of hostile to minorities. We see it, we hear it, we know it.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">DNC violated PCI requirements on credit card record keeping and state laws on SSN storage for billionaire donor <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DNCLeaks?src=hash">#DNCLeaks</a></p>— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) <a href="https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/756614760410583040">July 22, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Google now listing Wikileaks as a 'dangerous' site <a href="https://t.co/lihmY1xq6D">https://t.co/lihmY1xq6D</a></p>— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) <a href="https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/756618117875376129">July 22, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> Uh....... Wow.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DNCLeaks?src=hash">#DNCLeaks</a>: Washington Post & DNC joint unlisted fundraising party <a href="https://t.co/hnzglEZujf">https://t.co/hnzglEZujf</a> <a href="https://t.co/0sNTUedwIK">pic.twitter.com/0sNTUedwIK</a></p>— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) <a href="https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/756601388440940544">July 22, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
In a shift, Republican platform doesn't call for arming Ukraine against Russia, spurring outrage http://www.latimes.com/world/la-na-pol-ukraine-gop-20160720-snap-story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/07/21/trump-proves-hes-a-putin-lapdog/ http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...e_s_made_a_career_of_reinventing_tyrants.html
