Okay, enough of your delusion I wonder who's more likely to get rowdy of these two? Who's gonna make you sh_t your pants the most?
The Lakers didn't win any championships in the 90s. That's just one of the reasons why I miss the 90s.
They still were elite. In 1991 they were in the finals and in 1997 they got Shaq. The 90's was the only era where both the Celtics and Lakers were not elite for a stretch of 4-5 years which is also why many Lakers and Celtics fans discredit it.
No offense, but the Lakers in the 80's already had Kareem and then they got the #1 pick in Magic. 2 years later they got another #1 pick in Worthy. Celtics won the title in 1984 and was in the finals in 1985 and then in 1986 they got the #2 pick. Seriously can you imagine if the Bulls and Rockets when they were winning in the 90's got the #1 or #2 pick a few years? My point is, is they never deserved having all of those players to begin with when they were already winning. How do you get top 3 picks when you are in the finals yearly?
Kobe's an arrogant and dirty prick (great player nonetheless). They're a beatable team. Fisher deserves ZERO sympathy for the disgraceful **** he did last year. They love to whine. Oh, and Lakers "fans" are the most fair-weathered, spoiled morons in the NBA. I liked and respected the Bulls in the mid-90s. I didn't mind the Lakers in the early 2000s (until Malone showed up). I respect the Spurs. But these Lakers? Deserve no respect from Rockets fans. Amendment: If you *LOVE* Kobe and think he's the greatest to the point where you question if he's better than Jordan, then you're obviously too young to appreciate the game. And like most "Lakers" "fans," you can't name more than two players other than Kobe. You also boo "your" Lakers. You aren't from LA and might even consider yourself a fan of your closest regional team AND the Lakers...but only when they're good. **** the Lakers and their fans.
