Yes, by all means let's make decisions based upon who has the biggest contract, I mean that is more important than getting the ball to the guy who is leading the team in shooting percentage, right? I mean making the guys with the biggest contract is WAY more important than winning, right? STOP POSTING !!! DD
Scola is our best 3rd scoring option but unfortunately didn't get enough attempts. He should get a better contract then some of our "supposed to be side-kick player". That's what I mean. If my words lead you misunderstanding, I'm so sorry.
Scola's only shown to be a good scoring option over, what, the past 5 games? The Rockets are still making a lot of adjustments to the offense (It looks like they've started to figure out the part about making things easier for Tmac). They still have things to iron out, like utilizing Scola, posting up Yao, and what to do with the guard positions. They're getting there, don't worry. It'll take a while, and we may not win the division, but Adelman knows what he's doing.
The problem is our offense scheme is still designed for Yao and Tmac (if there is much thing). everyone else are just opportunists. if you are open then u can attempt to score. however, i really think the offense is designed for tmac, and that's why when tmac was out Yao loses in those games. He doesn't know his role and no offense style design for him. the game just stagnant
Many here stated that Scola cannot have plays going to him because of the Yao-Tmac oriented offense, let me tell you, Yao plays well with Scola, he is one of the players that see most of his cuts to the basket, so if you took 2 shots per game out of your less than 40% shooter you´ll get. 2 shots away from Mike James (average .354) 2 shots away from Alston (average .364) 2 shots away from Bonzi Wells (average .303) 2 shots away from Battier (average .387) Scola is averaging .533 from the field and he clearly averages better than that when given more than 6 shots, this way he could easily get around 8 shots per game with I would find interesting at least.