Al Qaeda wants the US forces to stay in Iraq. For decades there were zero attacks in the U.S. but that hardly means that all of the other anti-terror policies or lack of those policies were great ideas. In fact those policies are what helped the terrorists breed resentment, recruit, and convince people to carry out 9/11. As far as fighting them on their own turf, It is Obama who has said if he needed to he would go to where OBL, and Al Qaeda leaders actually are. Not anyone on the GOP. Your post sounds like and in favor of OBL, and his tough stance on terror.
http://www.latestpolitics.com/blog/2008/02/limbaugh-defends-clinton-and-obama.html Limbaugh Defends Clinton and Obama on Iraq Posted by Josh Gerstein Mon, 4 Feb 2008 at 5:27 PM Talk show host Rush Limbaugh is so exasperated about Senator McCain's surge in the Republican presidential contest that he is coming to the defense of Senators Clinton and Obama. On Mr. Limbaugh's program today, he said people should not be rushing to back Mr. McCain over issues of national security. The talk host said America's direction in Iraq would not be substantially different even if Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Obama were elected. "They are not going to surrender the country to Islamic radicalism or the war in Iraq," Mr. Limbaugh said after mentioning the two Democratic senators by name. "They are not going to do that to themselves, despite what their base says." "The idea that we've only got one person in this whole roster of candidates, either party, who is willing to take on the war on terror is frankly, absurd," Mr. Limbaugh said. Mr. Limbaugh edged closer to an all-out endorsement of Mitt Romney, saying Mr. Romney is the only candidate in the Republican race right now who can satisfy the so-called three legs of the conservative stool: social, fiscal, and defense conservatives. The talk host continued to wail on Mr. McCain, repeatedly accusing him of lying and disloyalty. "John McCain has stabbed his own party in the back I can't tell you how many times," Mr. Limbaugh said. As heard on KFI-AM in Southern California, the show included an ad for Mr. McCain, in which he talked tough on immigration, as well as an ad for, of all people, Mr. Obama, touting his endorsements from California newspapers. Mr. Romney's campaign said he also bought an ad slot on Mr. Limbaugh's show today.
His support comes primarily from a wide breadth of young people, strong liberals, moderates/independents, and republicans. Here's Rush Limbaugh, yesterday: "[Obama and Clinton] are not going to surrender the country to Islamic radicalism or the war in Iraq. They are not going to do that to themselves, despite what their base says. The idea that we've only got one person in this whole roster of candidates, either party, who is willing to take on the war on terror is frankly, absurd," - Rush Limbaugh
Al Qaeda says that the US wants the US to stay in Iraq, so you take them for their word. You're clueless. Ubama would try the puzzyfooted Slick Willie tactic to try to get Usama by lobbing a couple of missiles and calling it a day. The slickster had Usama's head on a platter and decided to lob a couple of missiles. The weaker minded Ubama is going to get pushed around like a rag doll in foreign politics. The guy can't even control what comes out of his mouth to piss off our allies (China, Pakistan). He's simply too inexperienced, weak and soft.
I could care less what Al Qaeda wants...Al Qaeda may want the Rockets to win....Does that mean I root aginst them? C'mon, The logic is flawed...Al Qaeda realizes that a free Iraq which can spread influence is a threat to the middle eastern region...You think they really "want" us there? No they want to "engage" us there, and if they really choose this fight...They will lose... So Let's do what we want, and what they want simulcast...beech!
LOL!!!!!!!! That was your logic. "Radical Muslims want Obama to win, so it must be wrong for him to win." Using the your exact language Al Qaeda wants us to stay in IRaq so it must be wrong to stay in IRaq.
There is a differance...one side is using talk...and that's cheap The other side...$...not cheap...beech!
Who knows. Maybe they think he's the most dangerous candidate to their beliefs, and they hope their public support will get people like you to vote against him and prevent him from being elected.
LOL. Yes indeed, and y'all speak for yourself, ROXRAN. Nice smear attempt though. Can I post my McCain for skinheads poster now?
Maybe they think he's the best candidate for their radical muslim beliefs...given the ties that bind and where the money goes, I'd summize this is the most logical reason...
Li'l t now defines terrorism as attacks by Al Qaeda and imagines he knows who was behind the anthrax attacks. Silly.
9-11 took eight years to plan, the fact that you're hanging your hat on another terrorist attack not happening again when they NEVER happen here to begin with as your argument is sad.
