I finally read through this thread, and by about page 3 or so I was thinking to myself, "Man, where is MFW? He's due up for a ludicrously pro-china meltdown that really only verifies his (and his country's) massive inferiority complex." And then I got to page 4. And all was returned to normal.
You better watch out, your mental r****dation has reached advanced stages. On a more serious note though, I do find it highly ironic that out of the usual customers, such as KingCheetah, Sammy, Deckard, Ottomoton, CometsWin (and more recently, Dubious, and plenty more I've missed), all of whom show to anti-China threads (and actually start them) far more frequently than I do, you singled me out. So once again, let's just be honest and put you in the rabid pro-US anti-China camp not pretend to be a neutral and fair arbitor shall we? What I do find even more funny is somehow correcting wrongly leveled China bashing. If you can't find a real issue to criticise, make one up. You know something else, how many pro-China posters still regularly show up, compared to the anti-China list above? They've already given up on changing your pathetic frame of mind. I'm the only one still here kicking ass and taking names. Take a look at your ass in the mirror. There's my footprint right there.
Cheetah, I've known brainless organisms that can exist in lower life forms, such as jellyfish. I didn't think they reached much higher in the hierarchy. You are truly worthy of study. You're about to revolutionize all we know about monkies and chimps.
You better watch out You better not try To discuss china here I'm telling you why MFW is coming to your thread He's making weird claims His replies aren't concise His insults and grammar aren't terribly nice MFW is coming to your thread He sees you when you're mocking But he knows that China's great His paranoia has no bounds So your replies he must berate O! You better watch out! You better not try To point out China's flaws I'm telling you why MFW is coming to your thread MFW is coming to your thread I singled you out because you're comically biased. Your posts sound like the chinese version of Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, complete with the paranoid "me vs them" ideology outlined above. Rabid? lol - I have one post in this thread, dude. The only one rabid in here about this stuff is you. Of course, you are utterly incapable of recognizing this.
Oh pffft and the other people aren't comically biased? Oh right you don't see that, or rather you're incapable of seeing that, because you're biased yourself. Probably
You know the funny thing, rhadamanthus, I give losers such as yourself a purpose in life. KingCheetah is already starting moronic trolls threads about me. Sammy does nothing more than couple of worthless pictures. Ottomoton takes a potshot every now and then when I'm not around, then hides when I show up. CometsWin claims to have me on ignore but never fails to read what I have to write. Let's be quite frank here, if I don't show up the lot of you would be rather disappointed. Comically biased? Look in the mirror lately. So let me ask you something, if the allegation is that China is selling arms to Sudan (which has been claimed), and I ask for proof that China is selling arms to Sudan, that is biased because? If the claim is the Chinese government hacked Google (which incidently is also claimed), and I ask for evidence that the Chinese government hacked Google, that is biased because? Morons such as yourself are long on allegations and short on evidence, as is always the case. When challenged to prove your allegations, your lot always engage in worthless question dodging. You'd notice I take a completely different tone when debating with InvisibleFan and rocketsjudoka. Despite their divergence in opinion with me, they actually back up their arguments with facts, figures and illustrations. You just pull something out of your ass. Other than to take the precursorial potshot at me, there was no reason for you to be here at all. Because your type don't discuss the issues in the thread. Your type doesn't discuss anything at all. By the time any China related thread reaches the second page, it has already been sidetracked so much that there is no point continuing it. I'll respond with a logical and well thought out argument on the end of page two and by page three KingCheetah would be back to his worthless picture posts. Sammy will be showing up 2 times a page, though that is a changing statistic, depending on how often he gets called out on his bullsh1t. And I pretty much start calling them morons, as they thoroughly deserve. The only ones debating at all will be me and rocketsjudoka. But hey, I could be wrong. And I'm willing to apologize if I am wrong. The thread topic is "why antagonize China," or if you prefer, why they antagonize each other. What have you to add to the discussion. If you're gonna waste bandwidth, at least make it worthwhile. As I've mentioned above, there's funny, heck, I'd even be semi-amused with stupid funny. That however, was just plain stupid.
Nah - I really don't care what China does much. Well, I guess I care about their rampant pollution, since that will directly affect me eventually.
I don't usually read or reply-to China threads. You must have me confused with someone else. I never said either of those things. I pulled nothing out of anything, except to brand you as a hilariously hostile nationalist. That's accurate - for "facts", "figures", and "illustrations" I recommend you re-read this thread. This is true. :grin: Any, and I mean any rational person would immediately recognize that the primary purpose of Sam and KC's posts here is to get a rise out of you. But you just fall for it like flaming plane crash every time. It's funny. I like to point that out. By all means, if we would like to actually discuss something, let's have at it - but this thread long ago devolved into Sam and KC making jokes and you erupting right on cue. Your first post here is a trirade about the Dalai Lama. Then you go off about a freaking picture of a stamp - a picture that was just blatantly meant to aggravate you. And it worked. You're like a dog chasing a ball - you just can't help yourself no matter how many times the ball is thrown. Etc. etc. I believe the interaction between you and sam and KC is a nice little microcosm of why this occurs. It occurs because both sides have their priorities, and both sides are well aware of how to "push the other sides buttons". The motivation for it can range from disputes, to posturing, to quiet threats aimed at maintaining just enough bluster to bolster national goals. Blah blah blah - lame topic, frankly.
I haven't. That is correct. But those things, among others, are the typical claims of the anti-China crowd, which makes your singling me out even more laughable. I am hostile to the likes of Sammy and Deckard, that much I don't deny. But you know what, it's a two way street. So it's good to see that you are applying the typical (shall we say) American double standard to that as well. As for nationalism, hey, if it's an American, he's patriotic (along with the implied positive connotation). But if it's a Chinese, he's a nationalist. Don't worry, I got that long ago. You are pretty much assuming that I actually get emotionally upset over Sammy and KingCheetah's antics. That assessment is incorrect. I view the two of them pretty much as a joke. I knew your kind don't possess much reading comprehension skills, I never knew it was this bad. My first post (which would be #65 in this thread) is a response to Major on the difference between the US meddling with China's INTERNAL AFFAIRS vis-a-vis China's perceived meddling of US FOREIGN INTEREST and which is more serious in "antagonizing the other," which if you haven't noticed, is the topic of this thread. The fact of the matter is, I neither brought up Tibet/Dalai or Taiwan. Had it been Uyghur terrorists in Xinjiang, the response would have been exactly the same. The second instance is merely another chance to call Sammy a moron, which I would never miss. Had it been somebody else, I would have used it as an example of typical anti-China flaming and doublespeak. But when it comes to Sammy, that has already been sufficiently highlighted so many times that such process is no longer necessary. If you've read the thread, I've already better summarized that in posts #67 and #70.
I view both flavors as grotesque. Perhaps if you ventured outside of these dull (albeit humorous) china threads who would know that. The irony here is that you have repeatedly tried to pigeonhole me into the "antagonizer" crowd with no evidence, while you simultaneouly lamblast those who are low on evidence against China or who label you as equally antagonsitic. Please. Calling them names (while fun) and getting all self righteous over an obviously inconsequential series of pictures is, without a doubt, emotional. Well then, we have little to discuss and your complaints regarding the lack of such conversation are rather dumb. But I already knew that, which is why I came in this thread to have some fun. A 1000 apologies, comrade.
That is inconsequential. For the most part I've no problems with patriotism. My only issue is regarding portraying oneself's as a healthy patriot whereas the other side's supporter cannot be any other than a brainwashed rabid nationalistic puppet. Unfortunately for you, the pro-China posters here engage in a lot more worthwhile decisions than the anti-China crowd. As for the other threads, I venture to them all the time. Read them, seen them, but did not care to participate, pretty much because I don't care about them. Am I unfairly pigeonholing you? Did you or did you not come in here with the sole purpose of antagonizing me? Did or did not your first post state: He's due up for a ludicrously pro-china meltdown that really only verifies his (and his country's) massive inferiority complex. I think you've pretty much picked sides from the get-go. But if I misread your intent, I apologize. Please explain to me China's massive inferiority complex. Self righteous? Hardly. As a matter of fact, I've stated already in this thread that I've no problems acting the part of a true scum should the need arise. As I've also stated, and I don't know why I need to repeat myself, if you say A (as the US does) but does B (as the US does), don't be surprised you get called out for it. If you claim to follow form rules (as the anti-China crowd routinely does), but break them in every thread (as the anti-China crowd routinely does), don't be surprised you get called out also. Self righteousness has nothing to do with it. There comes a time when every thread should just die. It isn't always that there isn't more to discuss, it's just that no one is bringing them up any more. This is one of those times. As an oddity for example, I've never understood the "I agree 100%" posts.
Oh no, I did come in here to antagonize you. I fully admit that. You argued that I did that because of my anti-China bias, which I do not agree with - and which only made my comments all the more....poignant. I point out your bias more than Sam's or KCs, because you're so serious about it that it's comical. But I repeat myself.
Please - the discussions amongst the hive mind of the Netizenry resemble the agenda from a bad GPCR rally: The only worthwhile discussion is when MFW starts swinging his Manch-warlord stick around..."I'm a big tough NORTHERN CHINESE badass descendant of royal blood, and all you southern Chinese are total pansy ass girly men" -> at that point it gets kind of fun.
lol And continuing making horrible photoshops that nobody except your closest lackey even respond to isn't equally pointless and pathetic? This is why you're biased bro, and you can't even see it.
Actually, many of the pro-China crowd directly responded to the pictures. Thus the point about the "seriousness" of the replies. Heck - that was the primary rationale for my comments, period. It was hilarious. And of course they're pointless and pathetic, but the reaction is truly comical. For chrissakes, KingLeoric felt obliged to point out that the little red book in the stamp does not actually say "Taiwan #1". Holy **** "bro"! - that's ****ing hysterical no matter what your political persuasion. Anyhow, whatever - if you think me pointing out funny aspects of the pro-China anti-photoshopping brigade implies anti-China bias, have at it. It really only makes my statements more true.
Oh my You seem to enjoy assuming the worst of others but become rather defensive when people do the same to you. You are biased. Whether it's anti China or pro-AntiChinaPosters (lol). Figure it out.
