1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Who will we get rid of to save money?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by GBRocket, Sep 25, 2008.

  1. Chuck Nevitt

    Chuck Nevitt Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2001
    Messages:
    349
    Likes Received:
    106
    If we sign Deke to the veteran minimum, not only does he not count against the luxury tax, the NBA pays a good chunk of the salary.

    Remember that San Antonio had to give up Scola to get under the tax threshold. There is no way we get back an asset, like a pick, in exchange for a salary dump. Even Head. We will have to give up an asset, in addition to the player, to get the deal done.
     
  2. DrNuegebauer

    DrNuegebauer Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2000
    Messages:
    12,628
    Likes Received:
    9,772
    Now that's what I thought!
    (except I thought we paid a part of the salary [[the 2 year $797k?, and the league paid the rest).
    Which effectively negates the impact of the luxury tax (since the tax we pay is in lieu of actually paying the player!

    That in mind, I think Damon Stoudamire firms up as a real shot at making the roster - he's a 10 year vet who would only cost us $797k (while making $1.3million).

    I've got a hunch we'll take a stab at a 7 footer - (see Woods, Loren from last season) and since Marcus Campbell is in camp, it would make sense for him to be the one included - the bonus is that he only costs $445k :D

    My projected roster would therefore be:
    Alston/ Brooks/ Francis/ Stoudamire
    McGrady/ Barry/ Head
    Ming/ Dorsey/ Campbell
    Scola/ Landry/ Hayes
    Artest/ Battier

    Mike Harris is unlucky again at the start of the season, but as a minimum salary guy who is available, he could probably be drafted onto the roster at some stage of the season should we feel comfortable making a move.

    Yeah - we'd pay a couple of million in tax - but worse things have happened in life!
     
  3. doublebogey

    doublebogey Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1
    To my understandings, only the league's reimbursement wont count against salaries and LT. For a 10+ year veteran minimum, 797K will count as salaries and the team needs to pay LT if its salaries are over the LT threshold.
     
  4. Albert Einstain

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    0
    To keep landry, I'm afraid les will have to loosen his purse. :D yes, it's purse.
     
  5. joesr

    joesr Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    6,772
    Likes Received:
    115
    I love how everyone here likes to go negative on another persons bank account.
     
  6. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,427
    Likes Received:
    5,178
    Jackie Butler is no longer on the Rockets' payroll. His "bloated contract" had a TEAM option for 2008-09, which the Rockets obviously declined to pick up when they waived him last year.

    It is Justin Reed who had the PLAYER option for 2008-09, which was obviously exercised when he was waived. But his salary is only about $1.75M. Given the logjam of players on last season's training camp roster, the Rockets should feel lucky that this is the only leftover salary commitment for players not on the team.
     
  7. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,427
    Likes Received:
    5,178
    That is correct. All minimum players (regardless of experience) count towards the salary cap and the luxury tax at the minimum level for second year players. This even includes rookies.

    In most cases, the team pays the player the second year veteran minimum, with the league kicking in the rest of the salary.

    For rookies, I think the team just pays the rookie minimum without any help from the league. However, for salary cap and luxury tax purposes, the rookie's salary counts at a higher level than the actual money being paid to him. This rule was put in place to discourage teams from rounding out their rosters with a bunch of rookies instead of veterans in order to minimize their luxury tax exposure.
     
  8. doublebogey

    doublebogey Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1
    What's that? :confused: I have never heard about that part in NBA salary cap.

    But there is a minimum team salary which is 75% of salary cap, ow, there will be a surcharge
     

Share This Page