1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Which of These T-Mac Trades Would You Do With the Pistons?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by A_3PO, Jul 16, 2008.

?

Which of These T-Mac Trades Would You Do With the Pistons?

  1. Chauncey & Tayshaun for Tracy

    79 vote(s)
    14.4%
  2. Chauncey & Rip for Tracy

    252 vote(s)
    46.0%
  3. Rip & Tayshaun for Tracy

    146 vote(s)
    26.6%
  4. Rip & 'Sheed for Tracy

    82 vote(s)
    15.0%
  5. None of the Above (If you choose this one, do not choose any others)

    133 vote(s)
    24.3%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,774
    Likes Received:
    41,190
    That was my vote. Both are really excellent players, to say the least, and Battier would be freed to use as a trading chip. Prince is an improvement over Shane. Move Battier for a point guard?
     
  2. Mango

    Mango Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    10,155
    Likes Received:
    5,616
    A_3PO

    If the top players in the NBA are in a group of

    Melo
    Bosh
    Pierce
    D Howard
    Kobe
    McGrady
    Duncan
    C Paul
    Dirk
    B Roy
    KG
    D Wade
    AI
    Arenas (maybe)
    B Davis (maybe)
    Deron Williams
    Boozer
    L James
    Yao

    and a few others, how many are reasonably available to Detroit in a trade?
    The better Eastern Conference teams (Boston, Cleveland, Atlanta, Philly, Orlando etc) are not likely candidates to do a major trade with Detroit.

    That leaves these Eastern Conference teams:

    Chicago
    Charlotte
    Bucks
    Miami
    etc

    to do trades with. Either the stars from those teams aren't going to be available or those teams are far enough removed from the Playoff picture that trading for Detroit veterans is pointless.

    Switch to the Western Conference and certain players aren't going to be available such as Kobe, Melo and Duncan. That leaves a very small pool of players left out of the larger list given earlier in this post. If Dumars wants to make a significant roster change, he has very limited options. Players like Rip, Prince and Billups are on a level below those listed above. If Dumars makes a trade for a player on roughly the same tier as those that Detroit already has, then has he really changed the team?
     
  3. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,454
    Likes Received:
    11,715
    Dumars just said today there is a "50/50 chance" the team will make a major move before training camp. So I think it's possible their top 6 rotation players all return. But the fact he's put every player on notice and openly stated no one is untouchable leads me to believe the odds are more like 80/20 something happens. I don't know why you rule out a SnT with Atlanta, where Josh Smith wants to leave very badly. A deal with Denver (AI or Melo) is still possible. The Blazers may want one of their veterans. The possibilities are so numerous I have no clue what will happen.

    Even if they trade for equal talent (which is what trades are all about, in theory), the team will change significantly. There are lockerroom motivation problems with this group of guys and they must be broken up because they've played together too long. I would describe it this way: Dumars wants "change for the sake of change" but he won't be ripped off by other teams. He's truly ticked off at the way they quit on Flip.
     
  4. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    Just to go back to the Billups/Hamilton option. Like I said, that is the one deal that I would do without any hesitation. I'm surprised to hear any kind of opposition to a deal like that. Just look at the pros:

    1. We'd have a high-scoring and very efficient backcourt.

    2. We'd bring in a pair of durable guards that averaged about 75 games the past few years.

    3. Our team FT shooting would improve drastically.

    4. Rafer would be put in probably the best possible position, as a back-up PG and spark off the bench.

    5. Rip would likely thrive in Adelman's offense.

    6. Our defense most likely wouldn't miss a beat.

    7. We'd still have our expiring contracts in Jackson, Francis and Head to go after another deal that might push us over the top.

    8. We'd still have a very nice frontcourt rotation with some good scoring, and a lot of hustle and defense.

    9. This deal wouldn't have a drastic impact on our capspace in 2010. Rip's deal expires in '10, so if things don't work out we can rebuild without him. Chauncey would still have 13 mill on the cap, but even with that we'd still have upwards of 20 million in cap space. Even if Rip gets an extension, we'd have a decent chunk of cap space left for a deal above the MLE.

    We'd have a huge ceiling with a high scoring backcourt, a solid PG rotation, a high scoring low-post player, hustle guys all up and down the frontcourt, upside assets like Donte, Landry (assuming we sign him), and those expiring contracts.

    Dumars probably hasn't come at Morey with this deal (I assume he's holding out on Hamilton since he hasn't been mentioned much in the rumors), but I would hope that Morey would pull the trigger on this, if possible. It's hard for me to come up with a better result if we end up dealing T-Mac.
     
  5. fadeaway

    fadeaway Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    14,701
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Agreed!
     
  6. TheFreak

    TheFreak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 1999
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    3,310
    I voted for the first 3 options. I'd have serious trouble rooting for Wallace.
     
  7. Mango

    Mango Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    10,155
    Likes Received:
    5,616

    From my POV, Detroit is seen by other NBA teams as a Motivated Trader. I think Feigen mentioned that Dumars has been calling around the NBA searching for a deal. Based on the earlier stories about Detroit asking about McGrady and Melo, it looks like Dumars wants (wanted?) an impact type of player to change the locker room dynamics.

    If the reports of his initial offer of Prince + Billups for players like McGrady and Melo were true, then he was throwing out a lowball bid. If Denver and Houston were motivated sellers of Melo and McGrady, the low bid approach might have been the best choice. Since Detroit has been unable to make a notable trade this offseason, then it looks like he will have to do better the second time around. As other teams make trades and sign Free Agents, Dumars will likely have fewer favorable options than he did a month ago.

    When the stories were going around about Detroit inquiring about players like Melo & McGrady, there was a story about Melo being upset with his name being bounced around in trade talk and Denver reassured him that they weren't planning on trading him. Supposedly, Denver countered to Detroit with a trade proposal of AI as the major piece instead of Melo and Dumars declined.

    Based on recent activity by Denver in dumping Camby for Free, it doesn't look like the Nuggets will be very aggressive in improving their team this offseason. I realize they gained a trade exception, but based on them taking the minimal Clippers offer over the Nets offer:
    Nets couldn't offer 'enough of nothing' to get Camby
    it leaves the impression that minimizing luxury tax trumps having a good team. If the future is the goal for the Nuggets, then taking a Detroit veteran doesn't serve their needs.

    Portland
    Trading for Prince might be the only thing that Portland would be interested in. Rip and/or Billups would take minutes from Roy and/or Bayless. Rasheed has already done a tour with the Trailblazers and is unlikely to go back. Players like Bayless, Roy, Oden and Aldridge that Dumars would probably like to acquire are going to be extremely hard to pry away from Portland. If Portland offered players like Webster or Outlaw etc for Prince, do players on that tier change the dynamics of the Pistons' roster & locker room?

    Atlanta
    I thought the Hawks was fairly conservative on the financial side and would be hesitant in taking on major contracts. They will have some players coming up for renewals over the next several years and they will likely stay financially prudent. If you were the Atlanta GM, what would be an Even trade for Josh Smith that would help the team?
     
  8. Chamillionaire

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,792
    Likes Received:
    2,527
    mac for rip, prince, maxiell.
     
  9. Chamillionaire

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,792
    Likes Received:
    2,527
    agree, but prince for outlaw and webster sounds good for both teams, but of course portland would be getting the better player and would improve their team so i wouldn`t want that trade to happen.
     
  10. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,454
    Likes Received:
    11,715
    Regarding Atlanta, they won't get equal value if they SnT Josh Smith to anyone. But they may decide to let him go if his feelings about Woodson are as strong as reported. I assume Detroit would have to give up Maxiell plus a veteran.

    We'll just have to wait and see what happens. If Dumars meant what he said about nobody being untouchable, there are a number of possibilities for the Pistons and we have a long while before training camp starts. Dumars' smoke-blowing approach to the trade process is a bigger obstacle than a lack of trade partners.
     
  11. Mango

    Mango Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    10,155
    Likes Received:
    5,616
    A_3PO

    I have been reading two different Detroit Message Boards and a McGrady trade is still one of the more popular topics.

    Has Josh Smith talked about playing in Detroit?
     
  12. Seth

    Seth Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,741
    Likes Received:
    25
    I like Billups-Hamilton-Prince-Herrmann(resigned as filler) for Tracy-Battier-Landry(Resigned)
     
  13. don grahamleone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,741
    Likes Received:
    35,358
    I voted for Billups and Rip, but if I were the GM I'd ask for a lot more. McGrady is unbelievable.
     
  14. MD_in_Training

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,104
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    This leaves us fairly thin at the 4.
     
  15. Zacatecas

    Zacatecas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    111
    I don't make any trades that involve McGrady.

    McGrady is a point guard, Shooting guard, and point forward while he is on the court.

    His shooting percentage is down. But it's probably because of all the double teams. With Barry, Battier, Head all shooting 3's in the 40%'s and Yao in the low post, this team is goin places.
     
  16. Rockets4279

    Rockets4279 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,208
    Likes Received:
    14
    I will take Billups, Hamilton, Maxiell, Stucky for T-Mac, Alston, Hayes all though that may seem a bit too high for T-Mac adding Maxiell and Stucky to our young core looks very nice on paper and even nicer on the court.

    Dorsey
    Maxiell/Landry
    Greene
    Stucky
    Brooks

    If Dumars dont like that then fine we will settle for Billups and Hamilton straight up for T-Mac.

    Any trade scenario that involves Prince and Wallace is useless to our team.

    The way i see it Prince is not too much better than Battier anyways and having both dont make sence to me.

    Then trade Head for a draft pick to clear cap space.

    Yao/Dorsey
    Scola/Landry/Hayes
    Battier/Greene/Novak
    Hamilton/Barry/Francis(closer)/Jackson/Head
    Billups/Alston/Brooks

    Yea Prince and Sheed is absolutely useless to us in any trade scenario. The way i see it they are better off keeping those 2 guys as opposed to giving up Hamilton anyways.

    We would still have Jackson, Head, Francis, Harris, Novak, Butler all coming off the books.

    This move still dont put a dent on our 2010 plans except for Billups this is why i believe Morey will want Stucky and Maxiell (expiring) as well and that would slightly over value T-Mac.

    Just say no to Prince and Wallace i believe Prince to be slightly over rated because of being on team USA drove up his value. As far as blocks and steals go and team field goal defense, Battier proved to be better defensively than Prince.
     
  17. Agentzero

    Agentzero Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    0
    bring Rip home anyway. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     
  18. Dave_78

    Dave_78 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,809
    Likes Received:
    373
    Billups
    Rip
    Battier
    Scola
    Yao

    is a sick starting 5. And 4 out of 5 of them are good to play every night.
     
  19. The_Nine_Gates

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like Rip and Tayshaun for Tracy. I think that would be a good one.
     
  20. Chilly_Pete

    Chilly_Pete Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2001
    Messages:
    2,877
    Likes Received:
    2,034
    I chose none of the above. I will take my chances in Free Agency in 2010 with Tracy's expiring contract.
     

Share This Page