1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Which is BETTER: UFC or Boxing

Discussion in 'Other Sports' started by RedRedemption, Sep 19, 2009.

?

Which is better? UFC or Boxing?

  1. UFC

    46.3%
  2. Boxing

    48.1%
  3. I hate fighting

    5.6%
  1. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,944
    Likes Received:
    6,696
    There are more good athlete in boxing that UFC. Boxing pays a lot better for the top guys. GSP is good athlete, but you don't see a lot of white guys succeed at boxing.
     
  2. VanityHalfBlack

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    18,716
    Likes Received:
    4,288
    hahah, That is why I watch a lot of van damme's and steven seagal films; at least with those, I have some kickass action...
     
  3. ryan_98

    ryan_98 Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,532
    Likes Received:
    1,048
    the ratings tonight will be interesting, too bad ufc doesn't release it's ppv numbers.
     
  4. vinsensual

    vinsensual Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    8,460
    Likes Received:
    794
    I like boxing more, but Dana White was right, nobody wants to see Marquez Mayweather. The next UFC's look like crap as well though, Machida-Rua and Couture-Vera are bound to be good fights like Couture-Nogueira but I'm not going out of my way to watch them.

    Give me Pacquaio-Mayweather and Machida-Silva and Silva-GSP.
     
  5. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    While I love boxing,

    watching men grapple on the floor does not interest me.

    Also, I'm not 15 years old.
     
  6. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    Marquez isn't a chump.

    And this was Mayweather's comeback fight...he hasn't fought in nearly 2 years.
     
  7. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    I really like them both, but a big boxing match is IMO more exciting than a big UFC match.

    Mayweather vs. Pacman

    Fedor vs. Lesnar

    Those are the two biggest fights I can think of in either sport right now and Mayweather vs. Pac would be a much bigger deal.
     
  8. baller4life315

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,703
    Likes Received:
    3,036
    I'm an old-school boxing fan, although there's basically no big names left so I understand the "shift" towards this UFC type stuff. Not a fan of the dry humping and leg headlocks but I do understand it's appeal.
     
  9. aghast

    aghast Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    169
    Sweet science because it's a fair fight.

    The heavier-padded gloves, ten-count and Queensberry in boxing mean that boxers who are otherwise winning the fight are not penalized for split-second lapses in defense. It takes a near-perfect shot to knock out someone in boxing.

    It takes a slip on a wet spot for an MMA-er to go from dominating a fight to finding himself on his back getting his head beaten in.

    That aspect of MMA might be more realistic, in terms of relation to an actual street brawl, but that does not mean it is a fairer or a more aesthetically pleasing sport. I want to watch highly skilled athletes performing at the peak of their abilities; I don't want to watch a street fight.

    As to corruption in boxing, yes it exists; worse than that, sort of like Pat Riley's Knicks in the NBA, clenching as a boxing strategy has severely impacted the viewing appeal of the sport.

    However, I find the greater corruption to be, relative to the PPV money raked in, the extremely low pay awarded to low- to mid-level MMA fighters. Once the MMA fights rival boxing in terms of gambling money expended, I'm confident that just as many or more (given the disparity in pay) MMA fights will be fixed.
     
  10. sew

    sew Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    3,406
    Likes Received:
    228
    Rarely do you ever see someone lose a MMA fight because he slipped and fell.

    Anyways, this is the beauty of MMA, some people are actually far more dangerous on their back then they are standing, it's a battle of styles. Boxing too me is one dimensional, MMA requires you to KNOW how to box, along with a number of other disciplines.
     
  11. Angkor Wat

    Angkor Wat Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,150
    Likes Received:
    997
    Its all about preference. I prefer boxing. Even in MMA, I mainly enjoy striking, not too fond on the ground game. The thing about striking in MMA is that it pales in comparison to Pro Boxing. Saying boxing is one dimensional is ridiculous. Its boxing! Thats what they do, throw fist. That is like saying basketball is one dimensional because all they do is shoot a ball in a hoop.
     
  12. farrisdabis

    farrisdabis Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,101
    Likes Received:
    8
    I'm really getting tired of this "street brawl" crap. That's what a real fight looks like. These aren't the days of Tank Abbot and guys like that. UFC fighters are legitimate masters at various forms of martial arts like Karate, Jiu-Jitsu, Judo, Collegiate Wrestling, Greco-Roman Wrestling, Boxing, Mauy Thai, Kickboxing, etc.

    "Street brawlers" don't have black belts, Olympic medals and collegiate championships.
     
  13. sew

    sew Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    3,406
    Likes Received:
    228
    There's actually a video out of Anderson Silva sparring with a professional boxer, and he does quite well. I'm sure you can google it.

    I agree that for the most part striking in MMA can't compare to that of boxing, but it's a totally different situation. MMA fighters have be on the watch for take downs, leg kicks etc etc...

    Boxing to me is pretty much taking one aspect of MMA, extending the amount of rounds and giving the fighters more rest


    True.
     
  14. Tom Bombadillo

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    29,091
    Likes Received:
    23,992
    HAHA, IF these guys are "masters of boxing", why don't they box?


    Masters of various forms my ass. More like Huntington Beach second rate athletes...
     
  15. farrisdabis

    farrisdabis Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,101
    Likes Received:
    8
    Okay, maybe I shouldn't have included boxing in that list but there are good boxers in MMA like Anderson Silva (who boxed professionally), BJ Penn, and the Nogueira's. Boxing in MMA has a long way to go because most MMA fighters come from grappling backgrounds.

    Second rate athletes? That's why other pro athletes take up MMA training in the offseason to improve their strength and conditioning? These guys have the craziest training regimens in sports.
     
  16. sew

    sew Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    3,406
    Likes Received:
    228

    :eek: wtf is this noise.
     
  17. Tom Bombadillo

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    29,091
    Likes Received:
    23,992
    Anderson Silva got TKO'ed in his first fight by a NOBODY...


    Simply put, the best athletes play real "sports"... They do not waste their time training to fight freaking Tito Ortiz...
     
  18. London'sBurning

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    7,205
    Likes Received:
    4,817
    I do recall De La Hoya saying that Diego Sanchez (MMA fighter) was in a lot better condition than him during training and they both have the same coach. With boxing, you can control your breathing pattern and sort of pace yourself. In MMA, if the fight does go on the ground, all those clinches or weight pressed on a fighter if he's on his back can expend a lot of energy. It's much harder to control the breathing pattern in MMA than in boxing because of how fast things can change. The weight disparity between fighters for better or worse does create mismatches that fans of boxing would otherwise b**** about. When I read that Mayweather came into weigh in 4 lbs more than Marquez I was wondering what the big deal was.

    I got to admit I don't watch enough boxing, but in MMA that's almost as fair as it can get. The weight disparity in the HW division of MMA is what turns me off from watching that division. I'm actually against cutting weight too because fighters just go back to their normal training weight right after the weigh in. MMA in Asian countries are fairer in this aspect because they almost never cut weight.

    I like both sports. I really enjoyed the Mayweather fight because of how technically sound Mayweather was. I can appreciate MMA in similar ways too.
     
  19. Angkor Wat

    Angkor Wat Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,150
    Likes Received:
    997
    The MMA equivalent of the mega fight of Pac-Mayweather would be Fedor-Brock. Obviously, that won't be happening anytime soon either.
     
  20. v3.0

    v3.0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,203
    Likes Received:
    931
    I look at it like this:

    That general repair maintenance guy that does a little bit of everything but not really certified or specialized at one specific skill. That's MMA to me. Maybe that's why it appeals to the average common joe schmoe.

    Those that are certified or went to school for their respective field of work like certified HVAC techs, CCNA or Cisco certified techs, ASE techs, etc...that's boxing to me.

    Pay reflects that also. Top boxing fighters get paid way more then top MMA fighters. Tells me alot that a former pro wrestler that couldn't make a football team can make it in the UFC.
     

Share This Page