If you want to end extremism then end gerrymandering. I think another poster posted it. When you carve districts that concentrate partisans you end up with extreme politicians. You want to end that? Then call for a constitutional amendment that has computers draw districts that looks like circles or squares with borders defined by boundaries such as county lines, rivers, major roadways, subdivisions etc having nothing to do with color, politics, or whatever. Take it out of the hands of politicians, take it out of the hands of people and let a computer decide what is the most rational districts based on creating districts with the total smallest ratio of boundary to area possible. Then ban super pacs and pass a campaign finance amendment so the Supreme Court can't make bribes a form of free speech.
I couldn't care less about being pleased by you. However, if there is "bad news" it's that you might be able to influence some here being misled by a Republican Party that would have our country led by those in the mold of Orbán of Hungary or Erdoğan of Turkey, but choose not to. That's clear. You don't have an interest in defending our system of government against the extremists in control of the Republican Party.
Don't act like you're Miss Innocent and haven't contributed: Plus, you make beef jerky like this: https://bbs.clutchfans.net/threads/beefing-posters.313975/ Which should be a bannable offense on it's own.
I think he's teasing you. Everyone in D&D has their line. Well, except maybe one or two posters, but one of them is a freaking zen buddhist monk and the other always sounds like an angry old man so you can't tell when they are triggered or not. Everyone else has beefed - quite a few times.
I'm waiting for what The Federalist or the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal has to say about this.
