1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Whats your view on the Dorsey pick? It seems pretty ridiculous

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by W22_STREAK, Jun 27, 2008.

?

Do you think Joey Dorsey was the correct pick for us at no.33?

  1. Yes

    417 vote(s)
    82.4%
  2. No(post your preferred pick)

    89 vote(s)
    17.6%
  1. aelliott

    aelliott Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    4,885
    This sounds really familiar. Couldn't we have saved time and just copied the post-draft threads from last year and replaced Landry's name with Dorsey and substitute Douglas-Roberts and Jordan for Davis , McRoberts and Fazikas?

    Did we learn nothing from last year?
     
  2. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,289
    Likes Received:
    1,908
    He is the same height as Landry. Morey rates him as the best defensive big. Landry is the worst defensive PF in the Rockets main rotation.
     
  3. Lil Pun

    Lil Pun Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 1999
    Messages:
    34,143
    Likes Received:
    1,038
    I would put Landry ahead of Scola in that category.
     
  4. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    I think (to borrow a saying from Stu last night), in the department of redundancy department, Morey and team decided another frontcourt player made more sense than another backcourt player.

    Yes, Dorsey is a little undersized, but not with his wingspan/reach and physical attributes to play PF in the NBA. Yes, we have a bunch of other PF's, but Scola, at the time being, is the only one you can count on. Landry may not be back, and even if he is is still a backup. Hayes should be traded. Add in that Dorsey may be able to slip in at C in smaller lineups and that's a plus.

    I think the other option at that pick was Mario Chalmers. But at PG, we also currently have Rafer, Brooks, BJ, and Steve. Like PF, Rafer is really the only one you can count on right now, but I guess Morey saw Chalmers as only having 1 position and not being as much of a need.

    AS has been mentioned CDR dropped for valid reasons. DeAndre Jordan...pass (he may be best case Andrew Bynum...whatever that is). Hendrix - is he really better than Dorsey (remember Dorsey played on a team with other great players, Hendrix played on Alabama). Ante Tomic? A finesse big man? Pass. Once again, when it came down to the end of the season, the team with the hard nosed frontcourt prevailed...pass on finesse big men (and I think Yao is much more of a brusier than people give him credit for).

    The problem with Chuck has been and will always be he is way way way too small. Deke is way way way too old. Dorsey addresses those issues, potentially.

    I think the Greene pick was just awesome. As excited as I was about Batum, I'm moreso about Greene. He definitely has some warts, but he is also definitely going to be 20 years old when the season starts. But there's a group of posters around here who clearly have Morey all wrong. Greene is super young, super athletic with enormous upside.

    Last night would have been an issue had the Rockets just straight out taken Dorsey with the 25th pick and called it a night, something I wouldn't have put past the old regime. Instead, for the second year in a row, they did some late first round/early second round wheeling and dealing, and I'm very optimistic Morey knows what he's doing.
     
  5. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,938
    Likes Received:
    6,688
    Another undersized 4 that is great. We already had enough undersized 4's last year. We needed a 2 to replace head and we could have got cdr and instead we didn't. We need to draft on need not add another 2 guys who won't play for us. We could have just got batum if we wanted to do that.
     
  6. ibm

    ibm Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    8,600
    Likes Received:
    60
    i am not saying we had to draft him, but what happened to cdr? why all the teams passed him by until so late in the draft?
     
  7. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,289
    Likes Received:
    1,908
    All Landry did was get a block at the end of a single game and his D becames good. When he's on the floor the Rockets seem to give up easy layups.
     
  8. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,412
    Likes Received:
    2,645
    Dorsey is 6'7.25" in shoes.

    Landry is 6'8.5" in shoes.

    On the street I'd say they're the same height, but in the NBA the difference of more than an inch is considered significant. And Scola is the worst defensive PF in the rotation, not Landry...
     
  9. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    The CDR stuff on this board has to stop. Listen to Morey. Put your thinking caps on.

    The dude is too slow to turn into something great. He doesn't have the lateral quickness. More importantly, he doesn't have a good enough shot from NBA three point land. His % from college three isn't bad, but he didn't take a lot of them, and that is college. Morey has said he and others feel CDR can't extend his game to NBA range. They feel he is way too slow. They feel he doesn't get enough seperation on his mid range game. If you watched Memphis at all during the season, those are very accurate statements.
     
  10. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,765
    Likes Received:
    3,700
    are you listening to morey right now? :)
     
  11. Hippieloser

    Hippieloser Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    8,271
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    I watched a few Memphis games on TV last year and Dorsey really stuck out, mostly because he has a build that you just don't see on a basketball player. He looks like he eats people. But Memphis DEFINITELY played differently when he was on the bench. Dorsey has a presence, no doubt about it. He can rebound and dunk and move people out of the paint, but he can't shoot from anywhere.

    It seems like size doesn't factor much into to Morey's computer analysis of college players. Success seems to factor pretty heavily. I'm not overjoyed with the Dorsey pick, but there's plenty to like, and it'll be nice to have a team stocked full of winners.
     
  12. Pete the Cheat

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    3,100
    Likes Received:
    487

    the summer is still young. realistically, if we are looking for an upgrade at the back-up 2 or a legit 3rd scorer, we weren't going to make that happen in the draft...the wizard has some more bargaining chips now...give him some time. I have full faith in this guy...and some of the more delusional posters on this board need to go ahead and jump on the bandwagon...

    as far as dorsey being undersized, that seems to be the way the position is headed. brand, boozer, west...all undersized 4's who are effective. he is going to run into mismatches, but who doesn't?
     
  13. HillBoy

    HillBoy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,926
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    Actually, I wanted them to go after this guy. He was worth the gamble in the 2nd round and has the potential to be a very good PG. Unlike Brooks, he has the size for an NBA PG and definitely has the pedigree from college. I just don't like the Dorsey pick and at 6-7, he's undersized for the PF position and extremely undersized for the center position.
     
  14. The Rock MVP

    The Rock MVP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    20
    We always complain that Hayes can't finish after a Tmac pass, but Dorsey can and can do what Hayes does best. Defense and Rebounding

    Dorsey is an upgrade over Hayes.


    But picking Dorsey + Greene over Arthur + CDR doesn't strike me as right. We could have been more versatile
     
  15. aelliott

    aelliott Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    4,885

    Since very few players use the top of their head to play defense, standing reach is a better measure than height. Dorsey's standing reach is 8'11" while Landry's is only 8' 6.5". That is a pretty big difference.

    Just for comparision, Al Horford's standing reach is also 8'11" and Joakim Noah's is 8'10.5".
     
  16. W-Mac

    W-Mac Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    4
    Are you freakin kidding me?? People, please get off of Chucks balls, the dude is terrible! I was at Reliant when Memphis was in town for the tourney....Dorsey is a BEAST!!!

    Basically it comes down to would you rather have 6'5 (what 230 #?) Chuck Hayes or 6'7 265 # Dorsey? With a 7'2 wingspan and 8'11 standing reach + 10x more athletic....ITS A NO-BRAINER PEOPLE!!!
     
  17. TRIQSTER

    TRIQSTER Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2003
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    171
  18. W-Mac

    W-Mac Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    4
    Maybe the Rockets having something else up their sleeve...ever thought about that?
     
  19. jump shooter

    jump shooter Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2000
    Messages:
    5,429
    Likes Received:
    145
    Agree with you on Scola's defense. Looks like Dorsey has a monster wingspan and reach.
     
  20. jump shooter

    jump shooter Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2000
    Messages:
    5,429
    Likes Received:
    145
    Agree to a certain extent, but don't underestimate Chuck's defensive BB IQ.
     

Share This Page