Lol DD, with more minutes he would commit more turnovers. I say 5-6 in 30-35 mins, but im just pulling outta my asss. The reason it's 1 every 10 minutes is because he hasn't played much in the regular season. I understand Amel's intention is to see how many people are still having orgasms over V-span, and it's more people than I expected. I hope you guys are being truthful and not just joking around, because I would like to know the truth. And I agree with smoothie, Alston is the best we have.
He's gun shy from what I've seen, because shooting is such a big weakness of his. Would you seriously want him to shoot the big shot down the stretch?
I would rather have T-Mac bring the ball up and use Luther as PG like the Lakers did with Kobe and Derek Fisher, just to shoot.
well the difference there is that fisher was a lock down defender too. luther is still a bit of a liability on defense. while rafer isn't a contender for DPOY he still comes up with a good amount of steals and keeps the TO's down.
Bring on V-span then! His turnovers can be hidden with T-mac and then we can throw in some plays to allow him to penetrate.
Aye, I hope your kidding. He's in the game to play the point, not the off gaurd. Also, his turnovers are created because he penetrates and jumps in the air for no reason.
I like V-Span but gotta agree he's not ready to start. I'm not voting though because I don't see the option to play V-Span some more than he his now.
If i could trade rafer and Padgett for Daniels and Booth i would do it in a heartbeat. If not, its not even close between rafer and v-span.
true, i was just thinking that for uptempo games against teams like Phoenix or like how Memphis played, Lucas would be better to backup in those situations.. but against slower-paced teams with tall PGs like Shaun Livingston or really offensive-minded PGs that can play in the paint like Chauncy Billups, it would be better to play Vspan as a backup because Lucas would get abused..
