1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

What happens when you mix 3/5 of a lottery team with 2/5 of a marginal playoff team?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by dconover, Jun 27, 2004.

  1. dconover

    dconover Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would take CAT before Jones, Houston, Maggette and Johnson.
     
  2. m_cable

    m_cable Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    9,455
    Likes Received:
    73
    I don't understand why people dump on this trade because we won't be Championship favorites next season. This trade isn't about becoming a champion next year. It's about building the foundation to contend for the next ten years. With Yao and Mcgrady as the foundation, then we mix and match role players and build chemistry until we become a big time contending team.
     
  3. KeepKenny

    KeepKenny Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2000
    Messages:
    2,721
    Likes Received:
    14
    Though I think Maggette has a slight edge on Cat, would it be fair for you to change your statement to read top 10?

    Also, the best thing about Cat has been his price-tag. Now that Doc has insinuated that Cat is going to opt out next year, that really changes things in my mind.
     
  4. Raven

    Raven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    YM is 23
    TM is 25

    Clearly if the Rox don't win next year, the trade is a disaster.

    This team will need a couple of years to get out from under the bad contracts of MT and Spoon.

    This is why getting Barry is a mistake.

    By the time the Rox get their payroll in order, he'll be too old.

    They should go after a PG who is still in their 20s.
     
  5. Stack24

    Stack24 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2003
    Messages:
    11,766
    Likes Received:
    1,737
    If you really look at one thing we are getting Juwon Howard who is basically the same as Mo Taylor with a bit of an edge rebounding wise and that is about it.

    I am pretty sure the rockets are going to deal one or the other in a deal to bring somebody to houston that we really need.

    I do'nt think the T-Mac trade is the only one that is going to be going down this off season.
     
  6. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,598
    Likes Received:
    35,723
    I was going to respond to this thread, but then saw Jeff's post and felt there wasn't anything left to be said. Well put Jeff. Definately worth a re-read.
     
  7. Cohen

    Cohen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 1999
    Messages:
    10,751
    Likes Received:
    6


    What made you think they would be done making moves?

    And in sports, 1+1 doesn't always equal 2. The sum of the parts can be much greater...or less than...expected. It's called 'team'.

    And a simplistic example of how a trade could make 2 winners out of 2 losers: a team with 2 quality centers and 2 quality pt guards trades with a team with 2 quality 2's and 2 quality 3's. That also should be obvious.
     
    #27 Cohen, Jun 28, 2004
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2004
  8. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    don't be short-sighted...this trade just isn't about next year. it's about having two very good, very young players and keeping them together for a while...building pieces around them.

    if the rockets aren't world champs next year, i don't want to hear people saying, "see...we should have kept steve." that misses the point entirely.
     
  9. leroy

    leroy Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    27,347
    Likes Received:
    11,211
    That is a very narrow view. I don't really think it matters where they came from. Has T-Mac ever had a dominant center to play with? We don't know what the chemistry is going to be like. What were Phoenix and New Jersey before the Jason Kidd trade? One was a marginal playoff team. The other was periennial lottery. Same goes for the Pistons picking up Rip Hamilton. Washington...not very good.

    All I am saying is that you can't simply add 3 + 2 to get 5. There are other factors.
     
  10. Ying Yang

    Ying Yang Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    He is in the top five most selfish Shooting Guards in the NBA!
     
  11. dconover

    dconover Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    Speaking of contracts... Howard... six years left on his, right?
     
  12. dconover

    dconover Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok... Cat is a top 10 two guard.

    So we are trading a top 10 two guard and a top 5-6 point guard and a top 15 big man for a top 3 players?

    Ouch.
     
  13. Willis25

    Willis25 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,387
    Likes Received:
    31
    dude - you're mixing 2/5 a playoff team (JJ and Yao) with the BEST 2/5 of a lottery team (Howard and T-mac were 50% of the Magic's offense) and then you're adding a PG

    Lue will not be playing here (he will opt out and the Rox will bring in a FA PG)
     
  14. dandorotik

    dandorotik Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,855
    Likes Received:
    3,752
    I seem to remember these configurations:

    O'Neal, Bryant, Fox, Fisher, Walker

    Jordan, Pippen, Paxson, Grant, Cartwright

    Olajuwon, Thorpe, Maxwell, Smith, Horry

    Duncan, Parker, Bowen, Robinson, Jackson



    Ming, McGrady, Barry, Taylor, Clark? Sounds good to me.
     
  15. Gutter Snipe

    Gutter Snipe Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2001
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    65
    Call me a sunshine ass, but that's not the best way to assess it.

    1. We are trading 3 flawed players (b-ball IQ, b-ball IQ, no offense) for one complete player who at worst is the #2 SG in the league and one flawed player.

    2. We are trading a star who didn't really want to be here and didn't really like his coach that much, plus a player who was so undervalued that he is rumoured to be opting out of his contract next year for a superstar who wants to be here.

    3. He who gets the best player in a trade wins. Is that really even in question here?

    Sure, we are giving up depth - but depth can be added. Top-tier talent is VERY hard to come by.
     
  16. dragon167

    dragon167 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2002
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    1
    LOL. Then what happens when you mix 3/5 of a marginal playoff team with 2/5 of a marginal playoff team?

    MARGINAL PLAYOFF TEAM FOREVER?
     
  17. shawn786

    shawn786 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,015
    Likes Received:
    6
    CD's not stupid, hes making this trade knowing he wil have his trade exeption still which he will use to get a new PF or PG, & we will most likley sign a low cost back up center.
     
  18. VesceySux

    VesceySux World Champion Lurker
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    7,552
    Likes Received:
    234
    Read this. Learn this. Live this.
     
  19. Throwed247

    Throwed247 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  20. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,148
    Likes Received:
    2,817
    Magette? Stackhouse? Rickey "Shoot at my own basket." Davis? You have got to be joking. I would say that Cat is right at the level of Rip Hamilton, Michael Redd, Latrell Sprewell and Ron Artest. He is at a level below Iverson, Allen, Bryant, Pierce and McGrady.
     

Share This Page