1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

What does coach RA see in Brooks?? What does he see in him over Lowry??

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by devin23, Mar 13, 2009.

  1. redao

    redao Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,819
    Likes Received:
    58
    no, the main reason is Rafer not playing.

    with TMAC and Brooks starting, the record was 5:1.
    without TMAC and Brooks starting, the record was 11:3.
     
  2. Hou.SportsFan

    Hou.SportsFan Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    12
    This thread and all of the hundreds more just like it are just becoming funny, I swear the Rockets could have Magic Johnson as the starting pg and there would still be tons of threads saying they should trade him or start whoever is on the bench. I'm pretty sure the Rockets could have all the players from team USA and you ppl would still complain about them. This is a pointless thread Lowry will get his chance to be the starting pg over the offseason, until then you are stuck with Brooks, like him or not.
     
  3. michecon

    michecon Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    9
    I endorse this post.
     
  4. michecon

    michecon Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    9
    I'm just correcting some technicality:

    games won: sample=20, it's 16:4
    shooting percentage: sample this season=612, it's 40.5%

    there you go
     
  5. devin23

    devin23 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    21
    LOL exactly. He got owned... I just don't get the love for brooks. He's my least favorite player outside of tmac in this team right now. I love wafer, even though he is selfish, at least he makes .430+ of his shots and is good at threes.
     
  6. redao

    redao Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,819
    Likes Received:
    58
    and the thread is about Brooks starting.
     
  7. michecon

    michecon Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    9
    The topic itself is getting old.

    I said: I'm just correcting some technicality.
    Learn to read, my friend.
     
  8. Drexlerfan22

    Drexlerfan22 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2002
    Messages:
    6,361
    Likes Received:
    520
    The thread is about him starting, plus you compare him to Lowry since Lowry has been a Rocket. Both those things point to the SAME SAMPLE SIZE.

    If that's not what you meant, you are an extremely poor writer who does not know how to articulate what he is thinking.

    Need I point back at your definition of a "chucker"?
     
  9. Drexlerfan22

    Drexlerfan22 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2002
    Messages:
    6,361
    Likes Received:
    520
    From the first post:
    Hmmm. "Since Lowry's been a Rocket." So this would seem to be the data set you're using to compare the two.

    So let me get this straight: you don't want to listen to how our record is so great with Brooks starting and complain about the sample size, then you turn around and say how you're "fine with Lowry shooting open 3s, since he seems to make those pretty well."

    He's a 26% CAREER 3PT SHOOTER! It's right here in black and white, and you ignore that about Lowry while bashing Brooks' FG%? You gotta be kidding me. Are you 8 years old? That's the definition of hypocrisy.
     
    #89 Drexlerfan22, Mar 14, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2009
  10. Drexlerfan22

    Drexlerfan22 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2002
    Messages:
    6,361
    Likes Received:
    520
    Actually, you need to learn to read.

    I said he STARTED THE THREAD based on the same sample size, not that he made the games won vs. FG% based on the same sample size. That came later.
     
  11. michecon

    michecon Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    9
    Here are some quotes from the first post:

    So, yes, he was talking about percentages. He didn't bring up the win-loss.

    And, again, seeing plays within the games is not equal to games played or win-loss record.

    It's Ok, let's not just argue for argument's sake.
     
    #91 michecon, Mar 14, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2009
  12. michecon

    michecon Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    9
    It's titled "what does coach RA see"... if he only sees win or lose, he won't be a coach.
     
  13. devin23

    devin23 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    21
    :rolleyes:
    Please, spare me your pompous explaination and you're justification for brook's mediocrity. Have you ever considered that maybe the 20 game sample was because of the consistency developed AFTER T-Mac "the liability" stopped playing??? MAYBE, like others have pointed out... The whole team no longer has any distractions and will ALL give their best effort?? I pointed out that Brooks was mediocre, not that he didn't play hard. :rolleyes: Just because brooks is the weakest link in the starting lineup doesn't mean the other 4 starters can't contribute efficiently on a nightly basis. You started your argument against me, I will finish it. Go back and try again.
     
  14. yuisakata

    yuisakata Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    7


    It's actually more like this real ROOKIE year since the only games he played in last season were all junk time in the ends of blowouts.
     
  15. devin23

    devin23 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    21
    Like michecon pointed out, when the hell did I ever mention sample size in my starting thread??? Brooks has had a low FG% ever since he's been a rocket, and this year, his shooting FG has been even lower than last years and he is attempting alot more shots now that he has more playing time. YOU are the one that needs to learn how to read. Get your facts straight before you post. :rolleyes:
     
  16. Zfan

    Zfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    8
    The answer is obvious even one doesn't know basketball can tell. Because this team was winning when Brooks started. You don't change the line-up when it works. That's simple.

    If Rockets get lose control someday with Brooks as starting PG, you may have a reason to put him to then bench. Right now? No way.

    I don't mean Lowry is not good. But you guys please be real. Basketball is all about result. Can you tell me why Manu is not a starter for Spurs? Is he not good enough to be a starter? Forget all those bullshxt analysis. Just face the truth. Spurs won everything when Manu came from the bench. Why not kept him on the bench?
     
  17. rockets88MT

    rockets88MT Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,340
    Likes Received:
    52
    i think that lowry should start over brookes. play brooks with the quicker second unit (wafer, landry, etc)
     
  18. ColdspringX

    ColdspringX Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2006
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    13


    So exactly what are we winning??? We had 22 games winning streak this time last year with Rafer, hello? anyone remmember? how did that turn out for us in the PO?

    AB doesnt belong to NBA starters, period. The sooner the Rox realize it the better chance Rox 's gonna get in PO.

    1.First and foremost, his D is Atroucious! and the room to improve is very limited.
    2.He's a streaky shooter at best, its pretty obvious now.
    3.His speed is way overated, at least for now, because he doesnt have the maneuvering ability as great penertrators like Paker does. He can sneak under for a quick layup once a game, that's about it.
    4.His passing and dribling are mediocre at best.
     
  19. 2rings

    2rings Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    3
    Both Brooks and Lowry have been very sloppy with the ball lately; RA needs to tak them to the wood shed on this
     
  20. killer instinct

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    1
    SHOOT FIRST PG and people accept that and praise AB. Dude we deserve to go out in the first round if we are that delusional in this town.
     

Share This Page