1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

We have a starting PF

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Old Man Rock, Jul 20, 2006.

  1. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,210
    Likes Received:
    9,034
    That was my thinking, though I doubt Gay would have been the starting PF under any conditions, I expected Swift to be traded for a SG since he was one of the Rocket's few tradable assets.
     
  2. DonkeyMagic

    DonkeyMagic Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    21,604
    Likes Received:
    3,487
    i'd expect to see tmac and battier getting minutes at the 4.
     
  3. michecon

    michecon Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    9
    Well, don't question stats, question the ability to use the correct stats and interpret them.

    You seem to decribe a situation that Yao drawing double-team on the offensive end will creat opportunity for Battier to grab some offensive boards if he isn't played out wide.

    Well, why don't we start with the obvious, start with defensive rebounding, start with rebounding when he has an opportunity to? Well, there's stats to measure that. Battier's def reb percentage is 9.8% when he has a chance to, (http://www.82games.com/0506/05MEM9A.HTM). Haslem? 19.1%. So your argument is thrown out of the window.

    Or do you suggest we re-develop Battier in order for him to start at the 4 for us?

    Any more theories?
     
  4. dfwrox

    dfwrox Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can you see a starting lineup as this for 70% of time

    Yao
    (??) (JHo) or trade (??)
    Battier
    TMac
    Rafer

    On offensive end, that's how TMac plays anyway.
    On defensive end, Battier gets the better attacking wing man, TMac gets the other;

    If we can't get anyone better than JHo, then when facing a team like Dallas, another line up can be: (30% of the time)

    Yao
    Battier
    TMac
    Snyder
    Rafer.
     
  5. double d

    double d Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2002
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    12
    Great, now we have 3 undersized power forwards: Battier, Howard, and Hayes. Let's get Corliss Williamson and re-sign Weatherspoon while we're at it. :rolleyes:

    And please, no more talk about Brian Cook. We need another POST player to play along with/behind Yao, to matchup against bigger lineups.
     
  6. michecon

    michecon Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    9
    I guess we'll have to wait until they finish all the moves to make sense what they are thinking. Right now, I'd rather have Tmac at 2 than Battier starting at 4.
     
    #46 michecon, Jul 20, 2006
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2006
  7. Yetti

    Yetti Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,589
    Likes Received:
    529
     
  8. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,598
    Likes Received:
    35,723
    Good post OMR, I totally agree. I see Battier playing the 2,3 and 4. But I see him playing the 4 a lot on the Rockets. It allows for better spacing offensively and with the way the NBA is going with quicker PFs, Battier seems like a natural fit there. The landscape of the NBA is changing. Teams are "sizing down" on some positions. It is more about quickness than it is about strength. Yao, Battier and Tmac are our frontline.
     
  9. Van Gundier

    Van Gundier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, I'll bet Chuck Hayes takes up at least 20-25 minutes at the 4 spot.

    Battier will get his 30+ minutes and play whatever position they need him to play. I doubt he plays more than 1/3 of his minutes at the 4.

    Juwan, if he's not a goner, will probably take up 15-20 minutes... perhaps more at the start of the season, but decreasing as the season goes along.

    As for Battier's rebounding... even while playing 1/3 of his minutes at the 4 and being outrebounded individually whether he plays the 3 or the 4, the Grizzlies rebounds better overall with Shane on the floor (at whatever position he plays) then with him sitting. So I doubt rebounding is that much of a concern.
     
  10. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,819
    Likes Received:
    41,289
    I agree that Battier is best at 3 and that is frustrating to me.

    But on the Memphis stats -- I don't believe those numbers are adjusted for who he's replacing: Gasol & Wright (when Gasol plays C) who are far and away the two best board men on the Griz roster.

    I think when you replace a poor rebounder like Juwan Howard with Battier the numbers won't drop off nearly as much as they did in Memphis.
     
  11. markus4040

    markus4040 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    40
    Battier can fill the role some of the time, not most of it. Imagine him against the real power forwards of the west: Garnett, Duncan, Nowitzki, and Amare (when he is healthy).
     
  12. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    Imagine any other PF against them. They lose.
     
  13. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,940
    Likes Received:
    39,386
    How did a rail thin Robert Horry do as a PF ?

    Oh yeah, he was the starter on the Rockets championship team.

    Is Udonis Haslem all that big?

    :)

    DD
     
  14. Danbury

    Danbury Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    7
    Why all the Juwan hating? Why would we waive him? I'm sorry, but he's not as bad as everyone makes him out to be. He's not by any means an elite PF but there are definitely worse 4's in the league. What's bad is his contract. He does not play defense, but he was essentially our best scoring option when Tmac and Yao were out last year. Why not bring him off the bench as a scoring option? I think in most games Battier will be the starting 4 because of his D and ability to spread the defense for Yao. Tmac will start at 3. Now the Rockets need to make some moves to strengthen the bench(and the starting 2). Snyder's not going to cut it. Maybe if Sura comes back to his 2003 form, then we seek PF help. If not, priority=SG.
     
  15. Danbury

    Danbury Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    7
    Horry generally played 3 for the Rockets (4s were Otis Thorpe and Chucky Brown) and besides he's 6'11.
     
  16. dfwrox

    dfwrox Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, let's take a step back. The things that most of us agree on are the follwoing:

    • Battier and TMac will start together;
    • Rafer and Yao will be other two starters;
    • On defensive end, TMac most likely can't guard SG because of his back;
    • On defensive end, Battier can guard all SF, some tall SG, some soft and or weak PF;
    • On offensive end, TMac controls the ball most of the time (who cares if he is SG/SF);
    • On offensive end, Battier most likely will on the perimeter and plays off Yao and TMac;

    So it seems pretty simply now -- Rox will have 4 starters determined for next season:
    Rafer, TMac, Battier, Yao.

    Depends on the opponent, the other starter will be either Snyder or
    JHo (or another PF from trade, signing);
     
  17. Van Gundier

    Van Gundier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've heard he's at least 12 inches. Even Shaq feels insecure around Udonis in the shower.
     
  18. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,210
    Likes Received:
    9,034
    This makes more sense, but is TMac physically up to this role, that is the real question? Until we see the Rocket's final moves, it is almost impossible to picture a starting lineup.
     
  19. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    I understand your logic completely but I think what you have to ask yourself is there any situation where JHO would better at the PF spot than Battier. I can only think of 1 and that is when both TMac and Yao are on the bench. Then I can see the benefit albeit slight of having at the 4 and battier at the 3, that assuming Mutombo are some other center is on the floor.

    And if you want break it down another way, which PF would JHO be better at Guarding than Battier. My answer is none. SO the only reason Juwan should take Battier's minutes is when we need another offensive threat because Tmac and Yao are on the bench. Now Chucky Hayes is another story.
     
  20. Asian Sensation

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 1999
    Messages:
    18,286
    Likes Received:
    7,445

    Very well put. I think some of us are weary that we don't have the "traditional" stud pf thats 6'10 240. However, we can fill the void by doing a PF by committee depending obn

    Lets pretend JHO is out of the equation just to make things more simple. Battier starts at the 4 to spread the floor and do a decent job at everything and we have Chuck Hayes the ultimate hustler to give a different look with a more gritty style of play and grab all the loose boards, and then you have Novak to throw in there to spread the floor and he'll hopefully knock down the 3 and keep the opposing 4 honest by having to come out and guard him. And in key situations I can see T-mac taking the role of guarding the other teams opposing 4 if he is a finesse player i.e Dirk, Gasol, Odom, Rashard Lewis, KG etc.

    Overall, if we are able to add that traditional 4 that can play significant minutes it would be gravy on top. However, I am content on going into the season with the moves we have made thus far and doing a PF by committee and finding out what works depending on what the other team throws out there.
     

Share This Page