1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

We do not need a PF

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by CARoxNut, Jul 6, 2013.

  1. Gday

    Gday Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    2
    1 star thread & everyone thinks the 4 is a problem? Seriously?

    We have 6 players that can play the 4. 6!!! Most teams would kill for that depth!

    D-MO
    Jones
    G.Smith
    Howard with Asik @ C
    Parsons with Garcia @ 3
    Casspi

    Asik & G.Smith were our 1st choice options at C & PF! This pairing is now one of the last options available to use.

    We only need 1 of 6 of those players listed to have an above average night on any given night.

    What happens when you heavily invest in a player like Smith (example only) & he is having a bad night or worse injured & there aren't any other decent options for the position?

    What happens if Howard is injured or struggling? Morey understands the big picture. Asik is staying for a reason!
     
  2. RickyNewport

    RickyNewport Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,636
    Likes Received:
    27
    This...

    And to add... If Asik is eventually to be traded, the longer Morey holds on to him the more his value will decrease. Even If McHale starts both Howard and Asik, Asik will still only probably average 15-20 minutes if that... More teams are going small and McHale likes to go small too.

    But I would rather they trade him for a 1st round pick in next year's draft that could end up being more valuable than any stretch 4 the Rockets can get there hands on. And a combination of TJ, D-Mo, Smith would probably be better than guys like Anderson.
     
  3. trowa2

    trowa2 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    879
    Likes Received:
    18
    bout time someone step up and say this
     
  4. cyntil8ing

    cyntil8ing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    615
    Likes Received:
    15

    I think you're mistaking quantity for quality. We may have combinations that we can put on the floor to play but, as many as there are, we don't have anyone at the moment that can step up consistently. If you're in doubt of that, consider this; we traded our entire PF rotation mid season because they were stop gap measures at best during a non championship run and nobody was been able to cover the position the entire season properly and there's no suggestion that the situation has changed since then. Nobody.

    As the season progresses, rotations are tightened and the intensity increases and only gets worse during the Playoffs. We cannot afford to play guess which PF to use on a nightly basis or worse, play shoe horn with off position guys like Delfino at the 4 and hope to beat out the top tier teams on a consistent basis. Now consider our opponents at the 4. Would you be OK going up against the likes of Duncan, Randolph, Lee, Griffin, Gasol, Love, Aldridge, Nowitzki, Fareid with a gaping hole at the position? I'm not even going into the E conference PFs. I'm not suggesting that we have to get a dominant player at the position but it cannot be as gaping as we have it ATM.

    My 1st thoughts after acquiring Howard was not immediately joy but wondering what would happen to Asik and our 4 spot because we have a small time window to keep this improving roster together. Also, I have to agree with one of the previous posters on this thread when he/she mentioned the misappropriation of resources to a single position. Asik, as beloved as he is on our team, is a luxury may not be able to afford. Sure, things can change between now and then but it's hard to imagine that it won't with a glaring hole in our lineup. Even Morey himself said so, the roster is not done yet. It's safe to assume that apart from Harden, Howard, and, to a lesser degree, Parsons, is expendable to balance out the roster.
     
  5. Panda23

    Panda23 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2012
    Messages:
    8,566
    Likes Received:
    620
    Well we cant play with 4 men
     
  6. SuperKev

    SuperKev Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    1,760
    Likes Received:
    732
    We have 0 players who can play the 4 at an above average level. Of course we need a 4. Because you have a lot of players who are capable does not mean they are either particularly skilled or well suited. DMo and Jones could develop BEHIND a skilled 4 but they are not there yet.
     
  7. radd

    radd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2012
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    6
    if we trade him we need to also get back a decent backup center, greg smith isn't good enough yet I don't think.
     
  8. Carl Herrera

    Carl Herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    45,153
    Likes Received:
    21,575
    We do need a PF. We just don't need one in early July since there are no real NBA games to be played until late October.

    There is plenty of time to sign or trade for the right one at the right price. In all probabilities, the team will find a more proven PF by the start of the season and we'll see what DMo, Jones or Smith can do if they remain.
     
  9. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    21,008
    Likes Received:
    22,414
    Totally against keeping Asik past the trade deadline, but otherwise agree with you. We shouldn't be in a rush to trade him anymore. Morey picked up Garcia, Casspi and now possibly J O'Neal. Our needs at other positions are not what they were a week ago. We're good right now so if anyone wants Asik, THEY need to convince US. We already took a discount on T-Rob out of desperation.

    Keep Asik until someone gets desperate. I'm hoping the Hornets call us and beg for Asik in exchange for Anderson and a future first round pick (or young player). Maybe the Bulls, but quite stupid of them to trade Boozer's backup for Noah's backup. I can see Minny preferring Asik over Pekovic - but would Pekovic accept a deal in the MLE range?

    We need to get an excellent asset for Asik. I want us to go into next summer armed with the MLE and 1 or 2 highly sought-after assets.

    Lin on the other hand - we either trade him now or not at all. I don't want the disruption of a new PG in a new system after training camp - unless it's a significant upgrade (which to me means a top 10-15 PG).
     
  10. Gday

    Gday Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    2
    1st point about not having anyone able to step up consistently at the 4 is wrong. Parsons with Garcia alternating have shown against elite opposition in the playoffs that they can consistently compete. Howard & Asik wouldn't struggle with consistency either. I'm not mistaking quality with quantity. Having several match up options gives opposition scouting a huge headache.

    2nd point the opposition 4 in our conference. Who better than the duo of Asik & Howard to go against Duncan, Gasol, Randolph, Love, Nowitski. Essentially against the teams with the big front court we have a huge advantage on the defensive end & if the opposition requires a different approach then we have that aspect covered as well.

    I understand your points & they are valid concerns especially with the doubts over Smith, Jones, D-Mo & Casspi ability to step up this year to being consistent but I believe in these group of players. Even if the four mentioned here aren't able to step up in crunch time playoff situations we have other alternatives that can do just that.
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. Gday

    Gday Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    2
    Also I forgot my 3rd point. We are better on holding Asik until 2014 FA. Love, Aldridge & other options are much more viable upgrades than what Smith or anyone else this year that is available.
     
  12. Gday

    Gday Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    2
    *was available not is
     
  13. charles_zed

    charles_zed Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,218
    Likes Received:
    42
    T-Jones and D-Mo both have a lot of potential. I would expect that one of them pans out to be a starting caliber 4 playing in this stacked team. We've also got Parsons and Garcia who can fill in spot minutes at the 4 or even throw in Greg Smith for spot minutes, it wasn't such a big issue playing him alongside Asik.
     
  14. Hui

    Hui Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    110
    This trade actually works on trade machine!!

    I was more inclined for Rondo if possible :grin:
     
  15. TJ VS TR

    TJ VS TR Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    37
    I don't know if there's any correlation but with Gortat, the Magic went to the Finals and conference finals; without him, first round exit.
     
  16. RoxDaBeard

    RoxDaBeard Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2013
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    134
    Damn I literally LOL'ed all over myself
     
  17. CARoxNut

    CARoxNut Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    11
    Word!!

    All the available PF is not worth trading away Asik.
     
  18. trowa2

    trowa2 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    879
    Likes Received:
    18
    explain???? i dont understand the picture:p:p:p
     
  19. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,071
    Likes Received:
    17,681
    I waver back and forth on this issue. I do not want to trade Asik unless we are getting a VERY good player back though. That player doesn't have to be an all star but he better be damn close.

    The way I see it, players like Ilyasova, Anderson, Granger, and some of the other ideas floated about lately are all interesting possibilities. But if we can't get any of those guys? Then yeah, maybe just holding fast with what we've got is the best plan.

    Not gonna lie, the prospect of 31 minutes of well rested Dwight + 17 minutes of even better rested Asik is very enticing to me.

    48 minutes of MONSTER interior presence.

    I do not favor the idea of playing Asik and Dwight together, to be honest. I think it would clog up the paint too much and I think we would struggle greatly against stretch 4's.

    The biggest argument against keeping Asik is still that PF position is a HUGE question mark. None of our PF's last season played at a starting caliber level. Jones, D-Mo, and Smith all have potential, but potential does not equal results, and this team suddenly looks like a contender which doesn't have time to waste developing youngs into legit players.

    Still, we can cross our fingers and hope one of them comes back having taken a huge step forward and turned himself into a starter level player. IF that happens, standing pat would probably be the best move... especially if it's DMo and he's learned to consistently hit the three ball and not be a pushover on D.
     
  20. newAge_Rockets

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2012
    Messages:
    2,343
    Likes Received:
    340
    Free TJ?!?!? No seriously, to get consistent play out of one of them, they need to get consistent minutes
     

Share This Page