Srsly bro. Bro, srsly. Give it up. http://www.google.com/m/url?client=...twIwAA&usg=AFQjCNGjnQGt981XITWb6X7JmcNOQVc19A
Give it up Bro. Webber clearly touched the ball out of bound and the refs gave it to Queens. Without that Lakers would have won game 5. <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_KjXHQSKzqs?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_KjXHQSKzqs?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
You seriously don't understand the difference between one missed call (part of the game) and twelve straight minutes of horrible calls all going in the favor of the same team?
I didn't lie about West. I said that the Memphis GM had served under West. Past tense. I realize West had retired already. Shaq didn't go to Memphis, so from the Grizzlies perspective, he was not part of that trade. It was a couple of late first round picks, a second round pick who had never played a game in the NBA, and an expiring contract for their franchise player.
Rox fans to date complained Mavs shouldn't have won the series in 2005 due to one out-of-bound play. How is this different? Refs gave the Queens one game first then gave Lakers the next. Both teams won one game they didn't deserve. And the outcome was fair and square.
If the Kings had lost game 6 because of a single wrong call, you would be correct. But a bad call here or there is part of the game. If the Lakers lost a game because of a single bad call, that's part of the game, but does not justify giving them a 12-minute long string of bad calls in the next game to ensure they win it.
