There is no reason for me to peek, idiot. I have already heard all of the garbage that you spew at least 20 times over. You are not worth the energy that it takes to click [here]. You are one of the biggest ignoramuses I have ever had the displeasure of having a "conversation" (having words with you is more like an enema than a conversation) with. And your apologist NJ isn't far behind.
Not as bad as Jorge -- but then most of us don't take Jorge seriously... Look at the Zogby thread, and read Sam's response to Faos. He calls him deaf and blind, and his statements r****ded. All for answering my question which was 'why he didn't like Kerry' - with his impression that Kerry hadn't really stood for anything. The anti-Bush crowd here are a fair bit more subtle than the Bush-boys -- but they pile on pretty good. No wonder we've lost so many insightful participants.
Thank you. I appreciate the compliment. Unfortunately, t_j brings out the most venomous words that I have to say. However, I stand by everything I have ever said to or about him as he has earned every syllable.
bnb, That is not a fair characterization, context is necessary: I was exasperated because of the following: somebody said that x was y, providing no evidence thereof; I proved/or at least gave some objecteve evidence that ths was an inaccurate impression and that x was x; 5 minutes later, somebody else says: no, x is y, claiming to have read the things I had linked them to, when it was obvious they didn't. That's where the deaf and blind thing came from. They claimed to have read that x was x, yet persisted in making the same factual statement that my post showed to be inaccurate that x was y, making it obvious that they hadn't read anything in a meaningful way. To Faos' credit, he later relented and said that his reason to oppose Kerry was not that he had no policies (x is y), but that he couldn't pull them off and just had a hunch (x is z). That is fine and dandy to have that opinon and I stated as much My language might have been a little harsh, but to compare to the attention whorishness/childishness on display in this and other threads (many of which I have participated in and responded in kind) by T/N_J is inaccurate.
