1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Venezuela Set to Develop Nuclear Power... With Russia

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by IROC it, Sep 29, 2008.

  1. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,106
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    Energy is dirt cheap there.

    The lines of WW3 are being drawn.
     
  2. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,214
    Likes Received:
    15,399
    The current cost to put anything into orbit is more than the cost of that same thing's weight in gold. At least that used to be true. Actually just checking the spot price, the the way gold has skyrocketed in the last several years the cost is about equal, but you get the idea (1 pound of gold = about $15,000). And that is just to low earth orbit.

    To get it far enough away that it wouldn't fall right back down into the atmosphere within a couple of years would be quite a bit more expensive.

    The way France manages the waste is that they reprocess and recycle it with exceptional efficiency. They are still left with a little bit of waste which must be stored, but not nearly as much as for a similar plant in the USA.
     
  3. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    Not really. Gasoline is dirt-cheap to the consumers, but only because it's subsidized by our consumption.
     
  4. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,106
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    Considering you would have to do it while it is in a huge concrete tomb that is not only abe to withstand a wrech on a freeway but a massive rocket explosion, I would say so.
     
  5. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    You can get a lot more than $15,000 worth of energy from a pound of uranium.
     
  6. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,106
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    how many pounds of concrete do you have to wrap it in?
     
  7. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,214
    Likes Received:
    15,399
    Undoubtedly. IMO, we should be building nuclear plants left and right. The only point is that there are more cost effective ways to deal with the waste. The 'shoot in the sun' scenario has a nice finality, but isn't cost effective.
     
  8. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    I agree. If I were the government, I'd allow anyone that meets safety requirements to build reactors, but I'd mandate reprocessing.
     
  9. redao

    redao Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    3,819
    Likes Received:
    58
    Nuclear plants have no future because of the waste problem and the very limited uranium. It is much worse than oil.
     
  10. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,214
    Likes Received:
    15,399
    Except both of those problems are solved by reprocessing.

    Not to mention, that you can make breeder reactors and make all the fissionable material you want.
     
  11. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    39,206
    Likes Received:
    20,353
    This is the price we pay for american hypocrisism. We support the independence of Kosovo - and yet we don't allow self-determination in other areas such as South Ossetia???

    And when Russia takes over - a population strongly sympathetic to itself...we take a hard line. Imagine if there was an island off of Cuba but close to florida, that was techniquely cuba but filled with pro-americans who loved America and dreamed of freedom, but felt persecuted by Cuba for it.

    American peacekeepers are there, Cuba invades. So we counter to protect them and kick Cuba out.

    Now Russia comes along and send ships over and takes a hardline against us. They also send nuclear technology to Venezuela. We'd throw a fit and of course play tit-for-tat.

    And you expect Russia not to play this game in return????

    So foolish. We don't need another cold war. Why is Bush/McCain doing this?
     
  12. Oski2005

    Oski2005 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    18,100
    Likes Received:
    447

    Because you'd have to be an idiot to build a power plant fueled by gasoline.

    <object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/goJPDcgwg62lfJL5cPs9Mw/0/21"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/goJPDcgwg62lfJL5cPs9Mw/0/21" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="296"></embed></object>
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now