1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Unofficial Texans' off season thread for 2014.

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Raven, Jan 9, 2014.

  1. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,527
    Likes Received:
    5,528
    As Donny said, there's obviously a great deal of (well-earned) impatience and frustration right now threatening to engulf the Texans - but this isn't terribly difficult to understand, and us taking time to explain it shouldn’t be confused with us absolving the Texans.

    The Texans had an appreciably better roster than Denver; and what good players the Broncos did have (Cutler, Marshall), they traded before their rookie deals were up. The Texans were good enough to make the playoffs in 2009 (but blew it) and invested in keeping that nucleus intact while adding to it (Joseph and Manning). And now the bill has come due. And FYI, the same thing is going to happen to Denver in a year or two.

    What people don’t seem to understand about the cap: it’s designed to punish good teams. The only way to sustain success is to constantly draft really, really well, so that when it’s time to pay your good players, you can cut them instead and have a viable replacement ready. *That’s* been the Texans’ greatest failure; not cap management. They haven’t found and/or developed enough players to avoid having to go out and sign Antonio Smith or Jonathan Joseph or Daniel Manning. They didn’t have someone waiting to take over for Demeco Ryans or Eric Winston...

    The draft is sooooooooo freaking important right now. You have to hit - and I mean really hit - on at least 40% of your picks each and every year.
     
  2. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    114,157
    Likes Received:
    176,616
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>I'm reading where Chronicle reporting Schaub returns &quot;next season.&quot; Not accurate. In saying he remains on team for now!</p>&mdash; John McClain (@McClain_on_NFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/McClain_on_NFL/statuses/444122596481564672">March 13, 2014</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>I wrote Schaub could be cut later, including before season. They won't carry his $10 mil salary next season. No reason 2 cut him now.</p>&mdash; John McClain (@McClain_on_NFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/McClain_on_NFL/statuses/444122910383276032">March 13, 2014</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
     
  3. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    15,452
    Likes Received:
    19,053
    are all sports beat writers this bad? seriously.
     
  4. desihooper

    desihooper Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2000
    Messages:
    5,748
    Likes Received:
    3,207
    <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>It's a three-year deal for Graham, who remains in Houston. <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Texans&amp;src=hash">#Texans</a></p>&mdash; Dave Zangaro (@DZangaro) <a href="https://twitter.com/DZangaro/statuses/444146966961086464">March 13, 2014</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
     
  5. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,972
    Likes Received:
    19,907
    Thank you for articulating that. I forgot about Brandon Marshall too, good catch.

    The Texans spent money in that era, and got some decent talent (moreso than the Broncos for sure), but ended up with not a damn thing to show for it.

    I don't think the Texans have done a particularly bad job with contracts (outside of Schaub, whose deal was extremely poorly timed), otherwise most of the underperformance in terms of big money has resulted from injuries, which you really can't predict.

    What I really criticize the Texans for is doubling-down on Kubiak, who was clearly incapable, and to a lesser extent Wade Phillips, who was clearly a Band-Aid. So much talent and time wasted by rigid, old-guard coaches who got smoked by their innovative, new-age counterparts.

    Did I enjoy the winning seasons? Sure. But if you had told me the wheels were going to fall off this badly in 2013, I would never have accepted that for the results of 2011-2012. Kubiak should have been fired in 2010. I wanted him gone, but I kept an open mind after they added Wade. Le sigh.

    Save us, Bill.
     
  6. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,527
    Likes Received:
    5,528
    They extended Schaub during the 2012 season? I don't begrudge that move at all. It didn't work out - but it was worth the risk, IMO: you get a very good QB at a relatively cheap price for what would have been at least two prime playoff years (conceding that his deal jumped considerably in year 3). The downside if you wait is Schaub (who we all thought was the difference between losing to Baltimore and winning the AFC in '11) goes on a Flacco roll and then you have to pay him appreciably more, complicated if the roll turns out to be an anomaly (as is happening in Baltimore).

    Foster, I think, is the move more ripe for questioning - they didn't have to extend him when they did (IIRC), and had they been in better touch with his workload and potential for breaking down (something even fans were acutely aware of), could have potentially managed him better (ie tagging him two years in a row so that he's essentially signing one-year deals). Having said that... hard to argue with their decision to lock him up.

    When I "defend" Smith, re: cap management, it's because he wasn't being irresponsible. The Foster deal was risky (as was Schaub's) but wholly defensible. It's not like Foster rushed for 120 yards in a game and they threw a five year contract at him.
     
  7. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,972
    Likes Received:
    19,907
    They extended Schaub after the first week of the 2012 season. Which means they basically had the deal drawn up all offseason, and waited to see if his foot would explode week 1. When it didn't, they signed him. It was unnecessary.

    To that point, Schaub had not proven his mettle. You don't throw a deal like that to a guy who hasn't put some playoff skins on the wall. When Schaub got to the big stage, he thoroughly pooped his pants.

    If Schaub got through 2012 and took the Texans on a deep playoff run, then yeah he'd be owed more money, but he'd also be worth it. There's a reason no one is calling the Ravens idiots for not having signed Flacco before their Superbowl run... unlike the Schaub deal.
     
  8. desihooper

    desihooper Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2000
    Messages:
    5,748
    Likes Received:
    3,207
    Playoff winning QB...
    [​IMG]
    Organizations can be judged by their GM, HC, and QB. Depending on the team, the Texans were behind all the top organizations in probably 2 of the 3 categories. Today, Rick Smith seems to be under-qualified and somehow saved his job, BO'B is an unknown (hope he works out!), and the QB position is very much unsettled. Really sucks that they squandered much of their window by not having a credible defense and then had it slam shut so dramatically last year.
     
  9. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,527
    Likes Received:
    5,528
    I don't necessarily disagree; I just think the course they did take was defensible and I don't want people to think there was ZERO risk waiting. There was.

    But therein lies the fundamental difference: if Flacco doesn't go unexpectedly Joe Montana in 2012 and their season ends the way we all thought it was going to as late as Christmas... there's a good chance they let him walk.

    I don't think there was ever a chance the Texans were going to let Schaub walk because he had been an appreciably better QB than Flacco and no one - no one - could have predicted he'd melt down *that* badly.
     
  10. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,972
    Likes Received:
    19,907
    Ifs, butts, candy, nuts, and so forth. The Ravens may have overpaid Flacco because of their inaction, but the bottom line is the Ravens have a Superbowl, and we suck ballz. :(


    I agree no one saw it coming, and I don't think they were going to let him walk after 2012 either, but they certainly wouldn't have given him as favorable of a contract after the epic fail that was the tail-end of 2012.
     
  11. HTown_DieHard

    HTown_DieHard Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Messages:
    4,050
    Likes Received:
    94
    Dude, i get everything you are saying. I just don't agree with it. It's comical to argue that the Texans had a way better roster when they were only 6 games better than the broncos during that time frame.

    And yes, the draft is "soooo freaking important"... LMAOOOOOO
     
  12. TheRealist137

    TheRealist137 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    35,432
    Likes Received:
    22,571
    so you don't understand that coaching impacts teams winning? Or schedule and strength of division impacts it?
     
  13. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,972
    Likes Received:
    19,907
    Ding ding ding.
     
  14. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,209
    Likes Received:
    9,032
    This should be engraved on the side of the stadium (whatever it is called now). McNair's stubborn "stick it to the fans" attitude regarding Kubiak and Schaub has put this franchise in another hole. As an average fan of the game, I knew both weren't going to work out years ago. Many on this board did. How can it have been so obvious to us and such a mystery to McNair?
     
  15. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,527
    Likes Received:
    5,528
    But the contract *was* pretty favorable and creatively structured to not pay him franchise money until he had proven himself worthy - I'm going completely off memeory here, but I believe he was paid $8MM and $10MM the past two seasons; he jumps to $15MM this year - so in theory, they would have had *two* postseasons ('12 and '13) to evaluate him at a relatively decent salary and an out before the big bucks kicked in (which is what they're likely to exercise this summer).
     
  16. HTown_DieHard

    HTown_DieHard Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Messages:
    4,050
    Likes Received:
    94
    Uh, i didnt realize the broncos had vince lombardi running the show, lol.

    Your excuses are great though, a common theme among the texans contingency..

    The bottomline is denver has a boatload of $ to spend, while the texans are waiting like a dog for cold leftovers.

    I don't even know what there is to argue, it is what it is.

    But i do know coming up with lame excuses and explanations for the texans poor salary cap situation is extremely delusional.
     
  17. TheRealist137

    TheRealist137 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    35,432
    Likes Received:
    22,571
    You don't even know what I am trying to say and which points of yours I am actually trying to refute.

    oh well
     
  18. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,527
    Likes Received:
    5,528
    Sticking your head in the sand is not an acceptable style of debate. Denver has a boatload of $$ not because they properly managed their cap but because their roster wasn't very good, and among the few good players they did have (Cutler, Marshall) - they dealt them before having to pay them. This really and truly isn't difficult.

    Let's agree to meet back in 2-3 years and check-in on Denver's cap situation, OK? Their bill is coming due...

    No one is making excuses, and no one is denying they have cap issues (though not terribly egrgeious) - we're just trying to clarify a misconception: the Texans didn't spend money irresponsibly and screw their cap; they drafted and developed players terribly and had to spend money to cover up for it.

    Again, you're so invested in your lazy, pre-sold yelling points, you can't even recognize when someone is criticizing the Texans. "But, but, but SALARY CAP!!!!!!!"
     
  19. Blake

    Blake Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,970
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Sharpton gone as well. We seem to be losing a lot of (albeit mediocre) players and adding nothing
     
  20. HTown_DieHard

    HTown_DieHard Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Messages:
    4,050
    Likes Received:
    94
    Uh excuse me?

    You're telling me Matt Schaub's unnecessary contract extension was not "irresponsible"?

    How about Arian Foster's?

    Oh, what about Brian Cushing's?

    Dude, you need to get your personal feelings and emotions out of your contract analysis. It's a BUSINESS!!!

    Handing new fat contracts to Schaub and Cushing as they were returning from serious injury was as irresponsible as it gets. I can somewhat understand paying Foster, but it's still boneheaded because they literally ran him into the ground for 2 straight seasons prior to paying him.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now