1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[UnOfficial] Astros Spring Training Thread

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by rodrick_98, Feb 13, 2007.

  1. jakedasnake

    jakedasnake Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2002
    Messages:
    2,731
    Likes Received:
    1,675
    True, I am just hoping everyone gets a fair shake in Spring Training and may the best man win hopefully. I just really don't like that Wandy basically has the 4th spot even though he has not improved in two years but he may end up being one of the better options we have out of ST. It will be a lot more fun following ST if 8 guys are competing for 2 spots rather than 7 guys competing for 1 spot in the rotation.
     
  2. texanskan

    texanskan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,565
    Likes Received:
    163
    No he is not the David Carr of the Astros that honor belongs to Jason Lane.

    Carr, has atletic ability but sucks it up most of the time.

    Wandy, has NO athletic ability and sucks it up most of the time.

    Lane, has power but can't hit.
     
  3. OldManBernie

    OldManBernie Old Fogey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2000
    Messages:
    2,851
    Likes Received:
    221
    There's a tipping point for everything. If Wandy really struggles in ST, and Sampson is looking like an ace, I'm sure they'll reconsider. Even then, it is quite possible that the coaches are having Wandy working on specifics in ST, so I wouldn't even put too much weight on his ST performance.

    On the other hand, if Wandy struggles for 4-5 starts to start the season, I'll be crying foul along with you.
     
  4. BigM

    BigM Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2001
    Messages:
    18,091
    Likes Received:
    13,366

    yeah the lane comparison is better, but it still works with wandy.

    i'm all for giving wandy a shot in the rotation, if he really really earns it. heck his first month last year was excellent. i just have this feeling that a spot in the rotation is his to lose and i don't want it a given that he's already in there.
     
  5. PippenAintEZ

    PippenAintEZ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 1999
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    7

    I definitely wouldn't consider Wandy being a debacle any time he pitches. I seem to be in the minority in some-what defending Wandy, I think he is a serviceable pitcher. Definitely nothing great, I will admit, but not Brandon Duckworth either. If memory serves me right, Wandy pitched his heart out and pretty well when he was thrown into Game 2 of the World Series. I believe he gave up just one solo shot in his appearance. Sure he is inconsistent, but I remember him coming up big a few times down our amazing stretch runs. I mean all else being equal, I rather be debating him competing for the 5th spot, but I say we at least give him a couple of bad starts in the regular season before yanking him. Just my thoughts though.
     
  6. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    101,026
    Likes Received:
    103,459
    I've posted this before, but here it is again:

    The Houston Astros were 11-13 in games started by Wandy in 2006. They were 12-10 in 2005.

    A .500 record out of your 4/5 starters is what you're looking for.
     
  7. BigM

    BigM Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2001
    Messages:
    18,091
    Likes Received:
    13,366

    it's hard to argue with the end result considering his place in the rotation but it's also hard to not think that his 5+ era isn't going to catch up to him eventually.
     
  8. jtotheb

    jtotheb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    16
    Don't mean to break up the Wandy talk, (ok I do...) but I am anxious to see if Luke Scott grabs that right field spot and runs with it this Spring.
     
  9. rodrick_98

    rodrick_98 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2000
    Messages:
    4,362
    Likes Received:
    6
    a pretty nice read from olney

    http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blo...ryID=2769238&name=olney_buster&CMP=ILC-INHEAD


     
  10. RocketManJosh

    RocketManJosh Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,881
    Likes Received:
    726
    Man am I glad to see this thread. Can't wait for the Spring games to begin.
     
  11. RocketManJosh

    RocketManJosh Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,881
    Likes Received:
    726
    Yeah, but if we had even decent pitching out of Wandy the record might have been a lot better. With the run support that Wandy got, another pitcher such as Sampson might have been above .500 in those games (not saying that he defintiely would have).

    I think a pitcher W-L record is one of the least important statistics to me. I like to look at ERA, WHIP, and Batting Average allowed with runners in scoring position as more accurate indicators of how well a pitcher is doing.
     
  12. arkoe

    arkoe (ง'̀-'́)ง

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Messages:
    10,387
    Likes Received:
    1,598
    That's a load of horse crap.

    Signed,

    [​IMG]
     
  13. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    I didn't realize anyone was suggesting that Backe even MIGHT be able to contribute at any point this season
     
  14. kaleidosky

    kaleidosky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,086
    Likes Received:
    1,352
    I had the same thought. And now he's already throwing and the article sounds like he's *expected* to contribute at some point. Halfway seems like the "optimistic" point.
     
  15. The Cat

    The Cat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    20,832
    Likes Received:
    5,424
    In retrospect, I'm curious about the decision making with Pettitte. As most of you know, I was fine with the decision to pass on the 2-year deal and in turn make the trade for Jennings. I've got friends that go to church with Andy, and they claim there hasn't been a day in the last year that he hasn't come in complaining about his elbow.

    That said, while I think Jennings is probably equivalent to Pettitte, it's a net downgrade if Garner is so committed to having a lefty in the rotation that he would stick with Wandy under almost all circumstances. I'd prefer Pettitte and Sampson/Nieve (one of them) to Jennings and Wandy.

    The 'Stros passed on Andy and gave up one of their most prized prospects (Hirsh) to replace him. Steep price, but in the end, I do think it was best for the club for the long-term. However, if Garner is so in love with the idea of a lefty in the rotation that he's willing to let said left-hander start over better right-handers, then that should've made Pettitte a really high priority.

    I hope I'm making something out of nothing. But Nieve and Sampson both showed excellent promise last year. In fact, Nieve was the first prized Astros pitching prospect in quite a while to come in and put together an above average rookie season. I'd hate to see one of them put together an excellent spring training and not make the rotation because Garner is so set on a lefty.
     
  16. Creepy Crawl

    Creepy Crawl Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    324
    The Astros ST jerseys are pretty sweet . I like the black lettering on the red jersey . I would like to see a regular season version of these .

    [​IMG]
     
  17. DOMINATOR

    DOMINATOR Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,458
    Likes Received:
    256
    i too think Jennings is overall the same but down the stretch and in the clutch Pettitte is proven.

    at the begginning of the season i see nieve as #4 and wandy as 5 even though i dislike wandy the most. i think garner wants to test the waters with him and see how it goes. if wandy does bad i expect Sampson to step in as 5th starter and wandy move to the pen as another lefty behind miller.
    and if sampson does bad then i would guess they would try albers and maybe even Patton since hes a lefty.

    my rotation
    Oswalt
    Jennings
    Williams
    Nieve
    Rodriguez... meh

    bullpen
    Lidge-C
    Wheeler
    Qualls (also possibility as starter but hes important for double play out of pen)
    Miller
    Borkowski-long reliever
    Sampson-long reliever
    Albers
     
  18. BigM

    BigM Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2001
    Messages:
    18,091
    Likes Received:
    13,366
    i think a lefty in the rotation is overrated unless he's only marginally worse than your next best righty. i'd love to see:

    oswalt
    jennings
    williams
    albers
    sampson

    hopefully those two guys really bring it in spring training.
     
  19. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    50,836
    Likes Received:
    17,228
    Garner LOVES having lefties... whether they're starting or relieving. It probably has to do with having first-hand knowledge about how a lefty pitcher affects the opposing team's right-handed lineups.

    Regardless, we all know that even if Wandy gets the job... he's still at risk of losing his job if his performance suffers. The rotation that starts the season is almost virtually assured of not being the one that ends the season.
     
  20. rikesh316

    rikesh316 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,447
    Likes Received:
    36
    My 12 man prediction pitching staff

    Oswalt
    Jennings
    Williams
    Wandy Rodriguez
    Nieve

    Lidge
    Qualls
    Wheeler
    Miller
    Borkowski
    Sampson
    Sauerbeck

    Sampson should be starting but Garner and Purpura love Wandy. Sleepers are Lincoln Holdzkom and Stephen Randolph.
     

Share This Page