1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Unemployment rate

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Air Langhi, Jun 29, 2010.

  1. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,737
    Likes Received:
    6,363
    I think you don't understand how R+D works, you don't need that many people for it. The place I am going to work for has like 10 or 11 R+D (1/2 with PHDs) people and like 50 people doing manufacturing. If 11 people are needed for R+D what will the other 50 do

    Here are a couple of articles explaining what the problems are with education being the solution:

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/mon...s-economy-martin-ford-technology-luddite.html.

    http://www.newsweek.com/2010/06/19/smart-young-and-broke.html
     
  2. Qball

    Qball Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,151
    Likes Received:
    210
    Your example is too micro. At the macro level and in long-term view, education and R&D is one of the direct causes production capabilities. The issue is that we're going from a manufacturing stage to a split stage of high-tech and service based economy. Our population is too large to be a straight technology based economy. But without the technology side, the service side can't exist (and not vice versa). Hence, I believe that the more education and R&D we get into, these new high-tech industries will bring new jobs.

    Again, I think that if the income gap wasn't so incredibly huge, we'd be ok and it would be just a matter of time till unemployment is back to normal. If we each had enough money to invest into the economy (stocks, bonds, etc), you could accept a lower wage, which would keep jobs onshore, but counter the low wage with investment returns. But currently, the investors don't represent the average American (which is a reason why I hate trickle-down philosophy).

    And no, I'm no economist but from the limited courses I took, it's what I got out of it. So don't expect me to back everything up with numbers hehe :grin: . It's just my opinion based on what I've seen and read.
     
  3. thumbs

    thumbs Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,225
    Likes Received:
    237
    Then you must declare yourself trollish -- I was agreeing with you.

    It's sad to think that, because someone disagrees with you, that makes that person a troll. If true, that's very shallow thinking, indeed.
     
  4. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    495
    Disagreeing isn't trollish, it is the way one disagrees that can be characterized as such.
     
  5. thumbs

    thumbs Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,225
    Likes Received:
    237
    I think I am civil in my replies, except, of course, when someone is churlish. In such cases, I confess, I can give as well as I get.
     
  6. GladiatoRowdy

    GladiatoRowdy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    Messages:
    16,596
    Likes Received:
    495
    My comment was not meant to be accusatory, merely a statement of what I believe to be fact.
     
  7. thumbs

    thumbs Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,225
    Likes Received:
    237
    Understood and, in the same vein, was my reply.
     
  8. Air Langhi

    Air Langhi Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2000
    Messages:
    21,737
    Likes Received:
    6,363
    http://www.employmentspectator.com/2010/06/report-most-markets-with-fewer-jobs-than-in-2000/

    Report: Most Markets With Fewer Jobs Than in 2000
    Wed, Jun 30, 2010Economy, Featured, Trends
    The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Wednesday that just over half of the nation’s 100 largest metropolitan areas have fewer jobs than 10 years ago.
    Of the 53 metro areas that saw declines, Detroit led the way with a loss of 498,300 jobs since May 2000. Other areas with six-figure declines were Chicago (down 365,400), Los Angeles (323,500), San Francisco-Oakland (250,500), New York City (188,900), San Jose (185,500), Cleveland (139,700), Boston (119,600).
    Of the areas that showed improvement, only two markets added more than 100,000 jobs over the last 10 years, according to Business First of Buffalo. They were Houston, which added 202,900 jobs, and Washington, which added 197,000.
    Another interesting fact pointed out by Business First of Buffalo is that the most common peak year for jobs among the nation’s 100 biggest markets came in May 2008 and the next-best was May 2007.
     
  9. peleincubus

    peleincubus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    26,055
    Likes Received:
    14,079
    soviet union is to russia

    that

    united states is to ??????
     
  10. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    38,312
    Likes Received:
    19,489

    Not only that, but Walmart employs over 1.5 million people in the U.S. directly (I - by far the largest employer in the U.S. second only to the federal gov't.

    They deservedly had a pretty rotten image, but what they are doing now in terms of making their stores 100% green and their efforts in sustainability is pretty impressive. They are so big they can shape the entire retail industry.
     
  11. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    16,013
    Likes Received:
    1,712
    I say we big time cut minimum wage. Controversial, yeah. But Americans getting a cut of something is better than getting nothing cuz it went to illegals or foreigners. Its actually competing with the rest of world in CHEAP low skilled wages. If thats indeed the "advantage" to getting work, and its a "deterrent" from employers hiring locally, why not open it up? Maybe its my belief that Americans can surprise with their initiative to want to pick strawberries as compared to NOTHING.
     
  12. Shroopy2

    Shroopy2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    16,013
    Likes Received:
    1,712
    Its them hiring 20 part time-3/4 time workers with no benefits and no unions, instead of 10-12 fulltime workers. Diluting take home wages for everyone. But if thats the only way to get a job in the end, what can you do?
     
  13. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    38,312
    Likes Received:
    19,489
    That's there prerogative. People have a choice to find other jobs. You don't have to be full-time to unionize, nor ask for benefits. But you can't bemoan the lack of benefits from corporations and then attack Universal Health care either.

    I also think it's ironic that people were happy to run a deficit during the boom years in exchange for tax cut but in a recession they want gov't austerity.

    I guess people have no idea about simple economic principles. We're ending stimulus and our economy is already showing signs of tanking again.
     
  14. Sweet Lou 4 2

    Sweet Lou 4 2 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    38,312
    Likes Received:
    19,489

    Yeah, fair wages of $10/hr. Haha. HOw do you compete with Mexico for physical labor? You import illegals!

    "skilled" physical labor doesn't pay much anymore unless it's in construction. You can get skilled labor in Mexico, China, or India for much much cheaper. And there's no way for an American worker to work at that low of a rate and make a living.

    If you worship the free market, than you should accept that the free market doesn't value physical labor that much anymore in the U.S. - and you better build something better if you plan on doing something like...buying a home.

    By the way, here's what the Republicans are doing....they are tanking the economy to win in November. Even Republican economists support extending unemployment benefits. But your beloved party has axed that to help the economy tank and win more votes. Is there anything more cynical than that?


    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/07/research_desk_responds_is_unem.html
     
  15. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    17,885
    Likes Received:
    3,455

    You are right on this. Despite Fox News, and libertarian like ideology, and the Dems spinelessness for not just calling them out directly on this, I think a certain percentage of those going through unemployment will wise up as to what side their bread is buttered on.
     
  16. JCDenton

    JCDenton Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    263
    Or we could just follow the Democrat-passed law and actually PAY for the benefits, in which case Republicans would vote for them. The benefits are out of control anyway. At some point well prior to the two year mark, people either need to find a job or stop expecting handouts.
     
  17. insane man

    insane man Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    5
    republicans (and ben nelson) stopping unemployment checks is really criminal.

    anyone w/o a multi-million dollar trust fund that supports republican policies is an idiot.

    and JCD, pray tell how people are supposed to find jobs when the official unemployment number is near 10% and underemployment and those not considered part of the workforce is well over that?

    this isn't a matter of people not wanting to find jobs because unemployment pays so well. its a matter of we don't have jobs.

    if anything those checks help stimulate the economy.
     
  18. bingsha10

    bingsha10 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,144
    Likes Received:
    342
    That was obviously the wrong thing to do then.

    But lets just compound the problem going forward.
     
  19. insane man

    insane man Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    5
    lets solve demand by killing spending.

    brilliant.
     
  20. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    57,689
    Likes Received:
    47,477
    Instead of looking to protect manufacturing jobs in industries that we can't do competitively we could look to develop new industries and also industries that are impractical to outsource. For instance we could focus on developing renewable energy sources and building an infrastructure based on such.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now