1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

U.S. Casualties an "atrocity?"

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Fatty FatBastard, Jan 11, 2007.

Tags:
  1. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,878
    Likes Received:
    20,536
    Is that what we are doing in Iraq? Just look how much more stable it is, and how much more stable it is getting every day.
    WHAT? No it doesn't. There are no credible reports that haven't been shown to be inaccruate that say Iraq was involved in 9/11. What you posted there is just completely wrong.
    No, it is obvious that it is a flop. We don't know the full extent, or what positives there are associated with it, but on the whole there is no doubt it is a flop.
     
  2. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,341
    Likes Received:
    10,806
    That would be a good thing... If "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas. However, our actions and inactions over the last 6 years have contributed significantly to the destabilization of the ME and the growth of Al-Q.

    The politics involved is getting you to say exactly what you said. Congrats Fatty, you've been manipulated.... you can either accept fantasies that have been disproven or accept the facts. The evidence is incontrovertible that Iraq was not involved in 9-11.

    "OK guys... just 5 more years in the meat grinder and Fatty will admit he is wrong." Ugh.

    It's not too early to tell. This war is not a triumph and no amount of wishing will make it so. It is a mistake of epic proportions.
     
  3. leroy

    leroy Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    27,515
    Likes Received:
    11,480

    Please provide 1 credible report that links Iraq to 9/11. Credible means that Pat Robertson had nothing to do with it.
     
  4. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    472

    only 3000 dead americans
     
  5. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,757
    Likes Received:
    9,289
    wow! :D what year is this again...2002?

    you must be one of those poor 20% who still believe this garbage.

    even bush had to come out and admit that there was no connection b/t saddam and 9/11...and that was in the fall of 2003! you better get some plutonium mcfly b/c you gotta get back in time!

    "We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the Sept. 11" attacks" - junior - 9/18/03

    or if the word of bush isnt good enough (if its not i wouldnt blame you - the guy is a proven pathalogical liar), how about the 9/11 commission which also stated that there was no link?

    In June 2004, the federal commission that investigated the events of 9/11 stated that there had been "no collaborative relationship" between the deposed Iraqi regime and the terrorist network in the planning and carrying out of the attacks.
    http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/11047
     
  6. rimbaud

    rimbaud Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 1999
    Messages:
    8,169
    Likes Received:
    676
    So are you saying you disagree with the president who has repeatedly (and as recently as September) said that Iraq was not involved?

    Additionally, which politics support a different view than the President on this matter?

    I know you have made this statement before but can't remember your responses to the above.
     

Share This Page