I just wonder what CF thinks of these two and who is better by comparison disregard attitudes, behaviour). Firstly, i am referring to the MIP AB not the r****ded 2010-2011 one. kletsgo. MIP BROOKS: PPG:19.6 RPG:2.6 FG%:0.432 3FG%:0.398 AST:5.3 SPG: 0.8 TO: 2.83 MINUTES:35.6 EVANS PPG:19.1 FG%:0.436 3FG%:0.273 RPG:5.1 AST:5.7 SPG:1.5 TO:3.1 MINUTES:37.1 Evans' rebs r hhigher due to him being what, 6 inches taller than Brooks, and granted he still has some aspects of the game to finetune (e.g. TO, 3PT), thu he has more potential than Brooks. What do these 2 have in common?? Both SHOOT-FIRST PGs, both pretty glued to the ball, love hogging the ball until few seconds lefto nt he shot clock, and cry when they dont get enough touches. Both players have had their clutch moments etc . So is Career Tyreke Evans better than MIP Brooks??
How can you disregard attitude? It's part of being a good player. Brooks is reformable. Tyreke will always be a selfish player.
i was meant to put a poll. oh well. yeah i thought tyreke aswell. i justw ant to know everyone elses opinion
One can shoot. One can't. Let's take the one that can. Eventually low efficiency ballhogging will wear out the fans.
It's irrelevant if they're great talents. There were/are definitely some greats who were selfish players in their primes.
Tyreke is the biggest hog I've seen thus far, no future for him unless he changes his attitude. Most importantly he will be a huge burden to any team, and he will most likely not win anything as a major piece.
