An animation? That's using simulation software. As a mech engineer we use simulation software all the time in the design process. That's not merely an animation. That software does final element analysis (stress analysis).
Yeah, but it all depends on software and data. OK, if we can have transparency on that, I'll go along. Let's look at all the data and crap.
Trillions of dollars. Regime change in Iraq. Oil. . . . How would the whole thing be exposed? What would "exposure" look like? On CNN, they announce . . . what? By the way:
Communicate in full sentences, please. It's difficult to carry on a conversation with someone using innuendo. There were mainstream political and business forces that were opposed to the costly and potentially destabilizing regime change wars in the Middle East. And certainly there were mainstream political forces who were fierce opponents to the Bush administration. So -- why do you find it so unthinkable that the media would be willing to expose evidence of that a terrorist attack on US citizens was facilitated by the government in order to pursue such an agenda? That would be the story of the century.
I am not accepting this, sorry. I will accept a video replicating how these explosives were placed up and down the elevator shafts of each building without anyone noticing.
He will only accept you building an exact replica of the NYC skyline from 09/11. Ensure the weather is exactly the same and the weight in the buildings is exactly the same. Get planes with the exact same weight and crash into it at the exact same time at the exact same location. Make sure someone is using a Hi-Res camera to document everything.
The example of PRD I gave is not trying to say the failure mode of the towers is the same as the PRD. I'm refuting the idea given by the youtube video you posted in which the guy tries to use linear mechanics to show that the rate that the tower collapsed is not possible. The PRD and rebar example I gave merely shows that mechanical energy that cause structural failure can move in a solid material. PRD is obviously not the same as the skyscraper. I am only pointing out the flaws in the argument in the youtube video that claims simple physics is the smoking gun evidence that the towers collapsed due to other reasons.
The minute you build a working scale model of it, slacker. I have it on good authority that there's between $30 and $100 in it for you (off the books of course, you didn't hear this from me, CIA budget's not what it used to be). Any discussions before that are classified, as they will just perpetuate the Round Earth Cabal's nefarious plans to do something...something that we can't tell you about just yet
