trump unfit and unknown long term health risks mean biden is only choice

I can only imply what your stance is with very reasonable assumptions.

So when you say "I support Jo"
And I reply with "She's a idiot who wants to eliminate the department of education" and you reply with "idiot, it's because she wants the state and local governments in charge of k-12 education"

It's a very reasonable assumption that you support her stance of eliminating the department of education.

 

Assumption is your problem, along with basic fundamental reading comprehension.
And again, critical thinking is paramount. Because I support someone doesn’t mean I agree with every policy or ideology. Not like you two party hacks.

 

You defended her position. If you didn't agree you would say "lol ya I like her but I don't agree with that position". No you defended it and while defending it made an assumption that I don't know her policy position in this case and I don't understand this subject matter.

So stop playing stupid. You defended her position and the moment I explain why it's wrong you suddenly are like "lol no I never defended it, why you so mean?".

 

You know, you might be the racer to assume that Biden is as much a racer as Trump given the overwhelming support one is getting compared to the other from the African American community. And as far as "potentials" go, we are voting for 4 year term and have lots of fail safe mechanisms against a POTUS being incapacitated (for whatever reason). You are just plainly hating on the guy for no reason. Otherwise, prove to us that he has an oncoming dementia and him stumbling or whatever wasn't just the pressure of the moment and a bully screaming at his face non-stop

 

Question: Why are you voting for Biden?

Answer: Because he's not Trump.

I would vote for Mike Fiers if it meant getting Trump out of office.

 

I would love for this narrative to get a toehold and grow, because it's true.

 

Maybe we have different interpretations of defending, I stated her stance after you brought it up (unsolicited).
If you wanted to discuss education reform or policy, start a thread. If I respond, then we can converse.
You don’t mean enough to me for you to be mean, you are a stereotype lol

 

You - "If that’s what you get from her education policy, it’s no wonder who you’re voting for.
She wants to keep education in hands of state and local governments, get away from big government oversight."

That diction implies that you are supporting that position and are making a determination that I have her position wrong .

So what part of her position did I described as wrong"?

 

I mean you can find numerous videos of his cognitive decline, just have to look. That’s not saying Trump is much better.
Also, the fact that black population supports the man that is actually on video and print using racist verbiage along with the being the creator of one of the single most causes for “systemic” issues in the black communities (crime and prison policies) is extremely ironic.

 

Fiers would tell the truth about things he was complicit to while in office but only after two years being out of office.

 

Thanks for confirming my assumptions about you

 

Again, you made the claim. I stated her general stance. Inference is on you, assumption is on you.
I didn’t claim I wanted to privatize education or not have any government oversight.
As with most things moderation is key.

 

And thanks for verifying my assumptions about you (and the majority of this group think forum)

 

Jo Jorgensen should be feared by African Americans in poor urban neighborhoods as free market Libertarianism is exactly how the 1000% wealth gap between the median white household and median black household formed. If you know the largest reason for this wealth gap: redlining, you would know why libetarian policies are disastrous for closing wealth gaps.

 

You said I didn't understand her policy. What part did I not understand? I see signs of goal posts shifting.

 

Also if moderation is key, than Joe Biden is the poster child for that position.

 

It's the same answer I heard plenty of voters say in 2016.

"Because he's not Hillary"

 

Lmao

 

Nope, no goalpost moving. Only narrative shifts and topic changes from you.

 

Yes, socialist policies are great at closing wealth gaps.