1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Trade rumor I heard today

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by ROCKET RICH NYC, Feb 11, 2004.

  1. OmegaSupreme

    OmegaSupreme Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,394
    Likes Received:
    1,504
    i mentioned the same thing about motay and yao earlier in the season.

    i was just thinking about typing "motay's no randolph", but given the same amount of shots and the opportunity of being a go-to guy on a struggling team... i dunno.

    anyway, as cato's minutes continue to decline, motay's getting more minutes. just after the season started it always seemed that either one or the other was effective while the other was in the game... not both, but it seems that they've worked their way around that somehow... i dunno... better spacing, if one can't get good position the ball is swung around to the other post player, etc. they've had some pretty nice passes to each other.

    i think it could work, but this late in the season and having someone else come in and learn the motions... i'd hate that.

    i change my mind. i have no idea if i like the trade or not.
     
  2. MacBeth

    MacBeth Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    2

    And, IMO, Mo relies much, much more on a mid range J that actually meshes with Yao more than ZR does.
     
  3. JPM0016

    JPM0016 Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    4,470
    Likes Received:
    43
    good arguments from both sides. I don't know either. I'd still like to give this team the full season together and then evaluate our roster in the offseason.
     
  4. OmegaSupreme

    OmegaSupreme Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,394
    Likes Received:
    1,504
    nice comeback. not sure if i recall randolph hitting a few outside j's or not during the games with the rox. i do remember him getting a few offensive rebounds and putbacks though.
     
  5. OmegaSupreme

    OmegaSupreme Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Messages:
    6,394
    Likes Received:
    1,504
    double post... my bad.
     
  6. okierock

    okierock Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    3,132
    Likes Received:
    199
    After this trade who would the team leader be?

    Snow?
    JJ?

    Usually the star is the leader, at least on all the championship teams that I can think of.
     
  7. Thanos

    Thanos Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2000
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1
    I like the trade a lot.

    Zach Randolph is the next best thing to Brand, and we should all let go of our Brand fantasies. He is not being traded, period.

    Why the HELL would anyone prefer Rasheed to Randolph is beyond me. Rasheed has been mediocre this year. He simply doesn't seem to care anymore and a strong second half seeking a new contract is not going to convince me otherwise.

    Snow runs the point and we get to keep Cat and Cato? No brainer! We can still trade them both later if needed and they are an attractive package to a LOT of teams out there.

    Patterson brings defense and toughness, and Woods... if it doesn't work out, just let it go. Remember that JVG has a reputation for dealing with bad apples succesfully. Spreweel became a model citizen under him.

    This is a better deal then the Ray Allen one. If Cuttino doesn't adapt, I'm sure that he and Cato can bring the right SG to us.

    It's a great deal, but I don't believe it has a chance of happening. We get WAY too much.
     
  8. CriscoKidd

    CriscoKidd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 1999
    Messages:
    9,303
    Likes Received:
    546
    There was a thread fadeaway made not too long ago asking what would each of us be happy trading Francis for. I listed quite a few. I didn't include Zach because I didn't think it was realistic for Portland to consider trading him. But as some have stated in this thread, maybe the arrival of SAR has changed their plans. And they have been wanting to jettison Patterson forever.

    I'd be all over this trade. Get a legit pf(god how long its been since barkley) and a pg who can defend, run the break, and set up his teamates? Sign me up.

    I wish GATER or someone would weigh in with the cap possiblities/ramifications of this proposal. I don't want to look it up. :)
     
  9. sup123

    sup123 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,989
    Likes Received:
    0
    only bad thing about this is that isnt zach a ball hog?
     
  10. Thanos

    Thanos Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2000
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1
    I would take a ballhog that shoots 48% any day.

    Who cares where the points are coming from?

    Someone earlier said corretly. We would be a front court dominating team. Cut the crappy nonsense stupid decision making and bring people who get the job done.
     
  11. bigboymumu

    bigboymumu Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 1999
    Messages:
    3,421
    Likes Received:
    1
    You have to be a Blazers fan!
     
  12. Franchise2001

    Franchise2001 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2001
    Messages:
    2,284
    Likes Received:
    20
    Real GM says:
    Houston trades: PG Steve Francis (16.8 ppg, 5.5 rpg, 5.9 apg in 39.9 minutes)
    SF Eric Piatkowski (4.8 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 0.5 apg in 17.0 minutes)
    Houston receives: SG Ruben Patterson (7.7 ppg, 4.2 rpg, 1.9 apg in 24.2 minutes)
    PF Zach Randolph (21.3 ppg, 11.0 rpg, 2.3 apg in 39.4 minutes)
    SF Qyntel Woods (4.2 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 0.9 apg in 12.8 minutes)
    PG Eric Snow (10.6 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 7.1 apg in 36.1 minutes)
    Change in team outlook: +22.2 ppg, +14.5 rpg, and +5.8 apg.

    Portland trades: PG Damon Stoudamire (12.8 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 6.1 apg in 37.5 minutes)
    SG Ruben Patterson (7.7 ppg, 4.2 rpg, 1.9 apg in 24.2 minutes)
    PF Zach Randolph (21.3 ppg, 11.0 rpg, 2.3 apg in 39.4 minutes)
    SF Qyntel Woods (4.2 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 0.9 apg in 12.8 minutes)
    Portland receives: PG Steve Francis (16.8 ppg, 5.5 rpg, 5.9 apg in 50 games)
    SF Eric Piatkowski (4.8 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 0.5 apg in 27 games)
    Change in team outlook: -24.4 ppg, -14.4 rpg, and -4.8 apg.

    Philadelphia trades: PG Eric Snow (10.6 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 7.1 apg in 36.1 minutes)
    Philadelphia receives: PG Damon Stoudamire (12.8 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 6.1 apg in 50 games)
    Change in team outlook: +2.2 ppg, -0.1 rpg, and -1.0 apg.

    TRADE DECLINED

    There were BYC players involved in this trade, so this trade is subject to the BYC provisions of the CBA. Due to Houston, Portland and Philadelphia being over the cap, the 15% trade rule is invoked. Houston, Portland and Philadelphia had to be no more than 115% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did not happen here (only Houston and Portland met the condition). This trade does not satisfy the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
     
  13. KALIKULI

    KALIKULI Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2000
    Messages:
    2,613
    Likes Received:
    16
    Patterson!!The nanny rapist! I don't think Les will approved that freak on this team.
     
  14. Thanos

    Thanos Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2000
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well, I remember rooting for them back when Clyde was the man and they faced the Bulls in the early nineties...

    You guys are underestimating Randolph. He is borderline All-Star at the age of 23 and has nowhere to go but up. Properly coached and with the right guidance, I'm sure he will play adequate defense.

    Bring a PG that can run a system without being a turnover machine in Eric Snow and you got me convinced.

    We still can trade Mo, Cato and Mobley later if we want to fine tune our lineup with the RIGHT SG! If Seattle wants to trade Allen, wouldn't they consider Mo, Cato and Mobley for him and Booth? It's a good package....

    Yao/TBD
    Randolph/Spoon
    JJ/Patterson/Griffin
    TBD/JJ
    Snow/MJ
     
  15. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,598
    Likes Received:
    35,723
    Did you by chance factor in our 6.9M Trade Exception?
     
  16. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,298
    Likes Received:
    1,916
    damn straight! fingers crossed that it's just a passing rumor.
     
  17. Tonaaayyyy

    Tonaaayyyy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2002
    Messages:
    4,537
    Likes Received:
    149
    sounds like fun.. lets pull the trigger:)
     
  18. yaopao

    yaopao Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    68
    You do the trade in a heartbeat. Big for small is always a great deal.

    Not sure the logic behind Por doing it. This would just add to their headaches.
     
  19. Man

    Man Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2003
    Messages:
    2,945
    Likes Received:
    13
    I'm not sure about this trade because although I think Zach Randolph is pretty good..and Eric Snow is a good point guard...Steve Francis is still an All Star and one of my favorite players and he's just our franchise.
    If this happened..like with any trade..then we would be different.
    Randolph has some pretty good stats..
    I guess it would be an OK trade except that Randolph, Patterson, and Woods are all pretty bad guys. The Blazers would get rid of all 3 of them in one trade..nice..
    I don't think JVG can control all 3 of them...our chemistry would be messed up.
    Do we have to get Woods and Patterson? Randolph and Snow would be just fine. Maybe they could give us...a good guy.
    Thanks for the excitement! :p
     
  20. michecon

    michecon Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    9
    I like Ray Allen, or Sheed ideas better. Zach is alrighgt though.
     

Share This Page