Tony buzbee filing lawsuit against Deshaun Watson? Hints at mistreating women

Ok, then take out Wilson and put in Herbert.

 

Liked by Watson.

 

Generally people who are moderate don't have an extreme disdain for one mainstream political philosophy. I gave you the benefit of the doubt of not being a nazi or fascist or other extremist, and labelled you a conservative. I'll stick with that unless you feel like otherwise enlightening me. Regardless, pretty sure you're not a liberal or a feminazi, as HardenOne wants you to be to make his worldview work.

 

I am far more moderate than anything.
In fact in the same threads you so graciously searched I say as much.
If you follow the actual threads and who the responses are to you would understand.
Regardless, I don’t care what you think I am. Or what HardenVolOne thinks.

I may be “conservative” on some topics and “liberal” on others. Both parties are two sides of the same coin and their followers are jokes.

Either way, that doesn’t even matter in sports except that you have some hyper political douchebags that want to inject their beliefs into situations that have nothing to do with their beliefs. IE race and political ideology.

 

I think you misunderstood what I was saying or I stated it wrong but that's what I was saying basically. If you can play, you can play, Black or White....it doesn't matter.

 

No, you're CONSERVATIVE

 

Lmao. And you’re a bigoted rapist supporter.

 

boy things sure got weird in here last night

 

That's an understatement

 

Lol. We commented on the case and all you have to respond is that?

How is your opinion stronger or more relevant than the judicial system?

 

This was an extremely predictable outcome from the start.

 

Hard to pick my favorite part of that, but I'll go with the words crashing with the pane of reality.

 

God may not be done with him.

But I dont want him around my loved ones.

 

A rich man beat the rap. News at !1:00

The real news is how corrupt the DA's office is. Supposedly nine women testified and the grand jury came to a decision to no bill in six and a half hours. LMAO

Enjoy retirement Kim Ogg.

 

Well after seeing us on the verge of WWIII with a POTUS that obviously has Dementia and a Vice POTUS who's living proof that you can sleep your way to the top leading the way. I'm all for the way Texas/Florida etc... does business. If this makes me a conservative then I will wear that hat proudly.

 

Ok. Trumpers will Trump.

 

Lol WTF happened to this thread?

I stumble in and all I see is the usual suspects making a thread about running a serial sexual predator out of town about partisan politics.....

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/2022/03/14/mmqb-russell-wilson-trade-negotiations-tom-brady-unretires

My old buddy Brad Sohn is a lawyer in Florida who’s worked on cases involving NFL players and teams for years, including the concussion litigation a decade ago. So I thought he’d be well-positioned to explain what a football fan should take from the grand jury’s decision over the weekend:

“A grand jury’s non-indictment is typically a strong indicator of very light evidence suggesting a person committed a crime. It is nothing like a criminal trial, where a jury, hearing both sides of a story, as told only through evidence satisfying very stringent rules (no hearsay, for one example), has to unanimously find someone guilty, and by a standard of beyond and to the exclusion of any reasonable doubt. In plain English, a jury might believe a defendant is ‘probably’ guilty but still have to vote to let him go because the evidence was strong but not definitive. A grand jury proceeding could not be more opposite. The only side of a story prosecutors present is the version they want to tell. And they can use absolutely any evidence they choose to do so. For example, here, The New York Times has reported these grand jurors watched full videos of witness statements to police. Those would never be admitted at trial. At that point, the grand jury was asked, in essence, Is there evidence to show that more likely than not Deshaun Watson probably committed the violation of ____? And it does not even have to be unanimous to return an indictment. A vote that probable cause exists by merely nine out of (typically) 12 grand jurors results in an indictment. As the expression goes, a prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich. So in Watson’s case, grand jurors heard hours of absolutely whatever story prosecutors wanted to tell, yet not even a divided majority could conclude that evidence (even measured not in terms of what was definitive but only what was likely) amounted to a crime. And this was not as applied to just one of Watson’s accusers. According to reporting, after deeming one case insufficiently credible to present, the remaining nine were returned without indictments. No doubt, people can act poorly without acting criminally. But given the embarrassingly low standard, the lack of even one indictment here speaks volumes.”