1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Three team trade involving Indiana and Seattle

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Rockets2003, Jul 22, 2002.

  1. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,282
    Hmm. GATER and NIKEstrad have explained several times that we basically cannot trade for Rashard Lewis because of all these BYC issues. So is it stupid to blame the whole board for saying no to a trade that cannot work anyway?
     
  2. ROCS4LIFE

    ROCS4LIFE Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not saying he will be another Cato, I said he might which is totally different. It's okay I agreee Lewis is a good player, but I personally still perfer KT. Now if that trade does go down, then is still alright with me, but I still perfer KT.
     
  3. Miggidy Markell

    Joined:
    May 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,264
    Likes Received:
    0
    Elie lacked defense??
     
  4. bigboymumu

    bigboymumu Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 1999
    Messages:
    3,421
    Likes Received:
    1
    You can use is or might all you want. Rashard is nothing like Cato.
     
  5. jello77

    jello77 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,178
    Likes Received:
    4
    well seattle MIGHT do this trade if shard tells them hell walk...getting croshere is better then nothing. to make it work, we should resign kt to a longer, larger contract.

    id do it.
     
  6. Shark44

    Shark44 71er
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 1999
    Messages:
    4,834
    Likes Received:
    9,579
    I know its fun to speculate, but I really think the Rocks will evaluate all of the options and make the best choice.

    Shard would be great...home town kid, improving young player, etc., but NOT for the max.

    Given our team depth, we have some attractive options. However, we should see what kind of deals we can make to solidify our top 7-8.

    Personally, I'd prefer a different C for Ming to learn from, work with, a solid starting SF and a defensive minded b/u SG. Funny we may have all of these guys on the team already.
     

Share This Page