True. But, they are a team and I will coin them together. If one fails, they bring the other down and vice versa.
Why would he admit to having sex before charges were filed? He wasn't being deceptive, he just had no reason to talk about his private life. At the time it was nobody's business.
This is huge for Kobe if you ask me. You basically have a he said she said case. Even if the jury think kobe is liar it won't matter now. Only one juror has to think that the girl could be lying. Not even that she did. And that puts the doubt in there that will turn one or two people. And this is the type of evidence that lends itself to that. In my opinion it will be difficult For Kobe to lose unless the DA has some witness that heard or knows what happened in that room. You also have to consider that if Kobe already spoke to the police (which I have no idea if he did or did not) he may have told them he had sex. That would refute his having lied to anyone at any time.
correction...you don't gamble when you might lose. But you have gambled in no-loss situations....crispee.
There's no reasoning with rezdawg. In his mind all girls with histories of any emotional instability deserve to be raped. Kobe is some white knight who can do no wrong and all he has to do is step outside his house, snap his fingers and 100s of girls will coming running to him wanting to have sex with him. If you ask me I think rezdawg is jealous and IS the one that really wants to have sex with Kobe.
Here is the case: A girl accuses a guy of sexual assault. The D.A. now has to prove this to a jury. All sorts of news is coming up about this girl. Anything that shows that she can be unstable will hurt the prosecution. Anything. The fact that she overdosed does not mean that she is lying. It does tarnish her "goodie goodie" appearance that she had beforehand. Kobe doesnt have to prove anything in order to be exonerated. And if you really want to be an idiot and say that in my mind, "all girls with histories of any emotional instability deserve to be raped". Then go ahead. Only problem is that I never said that. Go ahead and make **** up.
One more thing: My comments have people offended, but this picture doesnt get those same people pissed off? How is that? If you are that touchy feely that my comments rubbed you the wrong way, then this picture should do the same.
How is that offensive? I'm sure most parents would love to have their daughter in a pic like this with Kobe. I know I would.
See my comments on Page 2 of that thread as well as Page 1 where I pointed out that a "paramour" is a willing partner. Considering the allegations, I don't the veracity of that assumption. Obviously, you don't think your remarks through before posting.
They had a case before Kobe admitted to having sex with her. That was their only proof and they were hoping that Kobe would continue denying any sexual relations. Interesting. Since you're so close to the case, please let us know all evidence involved and how you obtained access to it. All this threads about Kobe and the comments within have made me realize how ignorant some people really are.
I never said that I know "all" evidence involved. The ones I do know, however, make it a safe bet that Kobe will not be found guilty. If you disagree, let me know why.
I never said that I know "all" evidence involved. Actually, yes, you said exactly that: That was their only proof and they were hoping that Kobe would continue denying any sexual relations. I'm curious how you know this. If you disagree, let me know why. I do disagree, because I don't know all the facts involved. Thus, I'm not stupid enough to make blanket statements like "Game Over" and "She's a Ho" and "That was their only proof".
Major, it was their only piece of evidence that they could have used against Kobe HAD Kobe denied ever having sex with her. The D.A. was trying to show that Kobe had in fact had sexual relations with this girl. Now that Bryant has stated that he has had sex with her, that piece of information is completely useless to the prosecution. It is quite obvious that a DNA sample was the D.A. biggest lead into these charges. The only other thing that they could have is/are bruises or scratches on the girl. However, to prove that it happened during the time of this "rape" is hard to prove. Do you disagree with the fact that the overdosing hurts the prosecution? Do you also disagree that the girl's friend dying makes her a little bit unstable?
You didn't need to come out and say that exactly because I'm using the same logic you've been using throughout this thread, which leads that conclusion.
