<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Governor, you get a phone call that Candy Crowley is on her way to moderate a debate. What do YOU do?</p>— nickgillespie (@nickgillespie) <a href="https://twitter.com/nickgillespie/status/260561454917373953" data-datetime="2012-10-23T02:01:06+00:00">October 23, 2012</a></blockquote> <script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
They're furious with each other. Do you think its authentic? edit: I applaud Romney compulsiveness. he has to address every point.
I'm the definition of a swing voter and my contempt for Romney couldn't be any greater. Felt the same way during the 2004 primaries.
Romney what color is the sky? Romney: Thats a very good question. We had a sky back when i was governor of Massachusetts. I like flowers.
No, he seems better because both candidates are slightly sexist and/or respectful of a moderator's request. Candy was a bad choice, but she was constantly unheeded. Any moderator will look weak or disrespectful if speakers don't listen to him/her.
Romney will be your friend, if and only if, you have at least 100 nuclear weapons. Sorry North Korea.