My god, find a single normal running shoe that gives over two inches of height. Stop being stupid, I know that’s difficult for you. You idiots are so defensive and biased it’s ridiculous, Young is short.
I’ll do the work for your dumb ass. https://styleandrun.com/tallest-nike-shoes/ https://onpointfresh.com/shoes-for-height/ https://footwearheights.com/shoes-taller-not-elevator/
There are multiple shoes in your websites that add up to 1.75 inches. That’s well within the range of what I stated which was 1.5-2 inches. Of course because you can only lean on being hyperbolic and distorting what people say, you now talk about over 2 inches. You’re a clown.
I'm going off observation. I think there's a good chance if DeMeco is hired Trey Lance will be coming with him
I think a 2nd and a 5th should get it done but San Fran could also push for the 12th pick and in that case Nick should negotiate with them in sign language
That’s too much for an injured qb who hasn’t shown much of anything on the field. He’s worth a third rounder.
There are only a couple that add 1.75-which isn’t over 2 inches jackass. Most crosstrainers add an inch at most. They’re meant to be light. The only hyperbole here is you and your idiotic takes. I’m sorry Young is a midget, you’re going to have to get over it.
If you can provide a quote of me saying over 2 inches then I’ll continue to respond, otherwise have a good day clown.
It’s my quote, to Rudy. Regardless, there are two shoes total over 1.5 inch which you claimed. 2. Hyperbolic statements like that shouldn’t be allowed. The overwhelming majority of crosstrainers and most shoes are around an inch, same as the sandals he has on. Either way, Young is shorter than Kyler, not near as well built and not even remotely close to the same athlete.
Im wit it. People already wrote Lance off after a couple starts and a season ending injury after a game in a monsoon that no one played well in. If the Texans find a way to get Lance, I would 100% be ok with kicking those tires. Sample size is small enough to easily be a big win without having to give out maximum compensation for it.
I think your absolutely right.. it makes to much sense not to happen. I”ll be good with bringing Lance on.
I don't think Lance moves the needle. He's shown nothing. He would simply be a place holder. In 5 years, we'll be here talking about the next quarterback and how we need to trade up (because we'll have built the team up) to get him. If I'm the Niners, I keep him. He is still only 22. Maybe he turns it around still. And with him being on a rookie contract, and them having given up a lot for him, it'd be a pointless loss of value right now.
False dichotomy. More like would you rather have Levis and the # 12 pick or Lance, #2 and #12? Lance has the same tools as Levis, has been in Shanahan's system for 2 years and is 1 year younger.
