1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The Roster as it is shaping up.

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Zacatecas, Sep 1, 2006.

  1. thumbs

    thumbs Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2002
    Messages:
    10,225
    Likes Received:
    237
    Personally, I believe the Rockets are going to trade Juwan Howard and Luther Head for a PF/C. I still can't believe we didn't pick up Scott Pollard. However, if we make a 2-for-1 trade, that will leave slots open for both Jacobsen and Azubuike.
     
  2. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    If we had Gasol, Battier would not get much time at the PF for us either. But we don't. Battier is the best 4 we got considering all factors, he has limitations as a 4 (versus the few true old style brute PFs left like Brand), but his net effect IMO will be better than Howard or Hayes.

    I think as long as one of Snyder, Abuz or Span can show they are at least a servicable starting SGs, our primary line-up will have Battier at the 4, Tmac at the 3. Now if they bomb in terms of being a consistent SG, yes Howard may start, but this is more a reflection of our SGs sucking (outside of Tmac) than the ideal scenario.

    What you have to figure, is that if we are forced to play Howard at the 4, than we are majorly outquicked at C, PF and SG. That is a terrible formula to take on the likes of the Mavs and Suns in particular. If fact more and more the league is going athletic and lots of PF/SF tweeners end up playing the 4 spot, such a plodding line-up sets us to get burned in lots of ways.

    But say we have a big guard emerge as a servicable starter (Snyder, Abuz or maybe VS), then we athletically match-up with most everyone, with only our C spot being slower than average with a lot of other guys able to compensate. And while we can match-up with most other teams on their athleticism, they still have to answer to Yao and Tmac on the other end, and that spells trouble for opponents.

    In sum the key to the season is getting some consistent guard play, particularly a big athletic guard that allows Tmac and Battier to play the forward spots. I am much less concerned with Yao, Battier, Howard, Hayes and Deke collectively covering the 4 and 5 (and Howard will be a sub for 4 spot against teams going big, a sub for the 5 spot when teams go small) than I am with our guard spots, so if we do another move before the season it will be for a better quality starting guard, not another 4/5
     
  3. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,832
    Likes Received:
    3,177
    I would expect VSpan, because he is the one for whom hope should be a reality.

    If it were whom I hope will break out it would be Snyder because I am not sold on him, but VSpan is the one for whom hope should be a reality.

    Novak is destined to be a spot player, at most/at best, this season. If he has the right head and the right heart then I could expect a right good career for the lad.
     
  4. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    The one huge avantage Snyder has over VSpan, and it is totally huge, is NBA experience. Remember Manu didn't start his 1st year, and he was as NBA ready (and much older than VSpan) as any foreign swingman.

    I look for VSpan to be a key bench sub this year, but not a starter.
     
  5. dreammvp

    dreammvp Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes Received:
    60
    you make it sound like we have an expansion team...at least have some optimism...
     
  6. Plowman

    Plowman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    13,137
    Likes Received:
    14,947
    IMO Van Gundy will have Alston start the season and within 10 -20 games Spanoulis will be the starter.
     
  7. xtint1n

    xtint1n Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    0
    why not rafer, vspan, tmac, battier and yao
    i dont trust snyder. it seems like hes just a smaller version of stromile swift
     
  8. BobbyLI

    BobbyLI Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    How much money does the Rockets have to sign Casey Jacobsen ??? :confused:
     
  9. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,832
    Likes Received:
    3,177
    Enough. If they guarantee enough.
     
  10. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,210
    Likes Received:
    9,034
    IMO, this team STILL has a weak supporting cast. Spin doesn't equal talent. As I wrote after that post, this team is two legit NBA starters away from anything real exciting. What will be fun is to see if one of the "scrub club" can emerge as something special. If one or some of the unproven players "come into their own," the Rockets could become a contender.
     
  11. vcchlw

    vcchlw Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    6,826
    Likes Received:
    1,056
    Both J-ho and Battier are too soft to be a decent 4 IMHO.
     
  12. Yetti

    Yetti Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,589
    Likes Received:
    529
    Count me as a ditto please!
     
  13. krosfyah

    krosfyah Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,811
    Likes Received:
    1,615
    On paper, I'd take J-Ho and Battier over Chucky Brown and Carl Herrera. However, Chucky and Carl managed to make a go of it. ;)
     
  14. themocitydon

    themocitydon Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    0
    damn. you must be smoking them sherm sticks to say crazy things like these. :eek:
     
  15. momosworld

    momosworld Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0

    What do you mean by soft? I don't see standing in and taking a charge against a full speed Yao being soft. Do you mean they aren't good enough rebounders? ..they don't fight enough? ...you touched them and they have soft skin?
     
  16. Desert Scar

    Desert Scar Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2000
    Messages:
    8,764
    Likes Received:
    11
    I don't see Battier/Howard/Hayes as "soft" either. They each have their weaknesses, but honestly that is a much more solid PF rotation than we have had in years.

    Overall they can be adequate/middle of the pack, which is fine given we may have the best C/SF combination in the league.

    My big question is whether our guards can consistently produce and will be reliable when it matters.
     
  17. BlakeB

    BlakeB Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2006
    Messages:
    318
    Likes Received:
    0
    Battier is going to be great at the PF spot for us. Battier has decent size and plays his heart out every game, he is just the kind of player we need to help us get the title. Sure, he's not your typical PF, but he is going to get plenty of rebounds for us, and he will shut down the other team's PF as good as nearly any other Power Forward in the league. He can also keep defenses honest with his outside shot. I think we'll see Battier putting up better numbers than he ever put up in Memphis as he now has more talent around him. Not that his numbers will be hugely improved or anything, but Battier is the kind of player where numbers don't really tell the story of how much of an impact he can have on a team.

    And I also like the idea of Howard coming off the bench as backup PF. I cannot think of a better role for him. He is indeed above average serving as a backup, and with him playing 15-20 minutes a night he will be filling the role he is best fit to fill. One thing I would like to see, though, is for Houston to pick up a big thrashing PF/C who could play both spots and could serve as a counter balance to Battier's more technical and refined approach to the PF spot.
     

Share This Page