1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The Oscar nominations are in...

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by VesceySux, Jan 27, 2004.

  1. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    It didn't have to be a complex plot, just one where the viewer didn't see the end coming a mile away. Was I the only one who figured it out so early?
     
  2. Woofer

    Woofer Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2000
    Messages:
    3,995
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't understand the Seabiscuit nomination either. It was a nice sports movie, nothing great. I loved Whale Rider by comparison. Agree about Pirates of, it and Finding Nemo were the most enjoyable movies I've seen this year. Lost in Translation - flew over my head. I thought the Scary Movie chick was very funny, an Scarlett has a nice butt, otherwise it did not do anything for me.
     
  3. AGBee

    AGBee Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    5,875
    Likes Received:
    29
    I thought The Alamo was going to sweep all the awards. What, it wasn't released? D'oh!
     
  4. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,790
    Likes Received:
    41,226
    I agree. I can't see how the movie(s) can get so many nominations and the guy who could arguably have given the best acting job gets nothing. Rediculous.
     
  5. Bailey

    Bailey Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 1999
    Messages:
    1,977
    Likes Received:
    50
    Honestly, I found Sam and Frodo the most irritating characters (after the comedy dwarf, Gimli. Why did they do that to the character?)

    Good films, no really great performances, IMHO.
     
  6. Woofer

    Woofer Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2000
    Messages:
    3,995
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wasn't Gimli comic relief in the books as well?
     
  7. MacBeth

    MacBeth Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    7,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    I have to disagree with those who are prasing the selection of Ken Watanabe. The man has charisma, no doubt, but as far as actual acting, it was a bit cardboard at times for me, especially his need to punctuate almost every tense conversation with a glare straight ahead followed by a sudden sharp turn and stalk off stage right.

    Don't get me wrong...it was a good movie, good enough to overcome the obvious and annoying Tootsie Factor...and Watanabe played a role in that, and at times was quite good. But not an even performance, IMO.
     
  8. LegendZ3

    LegendZ3 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    4,196
    Likes Received:
    5
    I'm surprised that "The Last Samurai" didn't get some many nominations, I liked that movie, and I thought Tom Cruise deserve the nomination of best actor.
     
  9. Nomar

    Nomar Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2000
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    2
    Vescey - :rolleyes: to all nominations for ROTK.

    Having not seen Lost in Translation yet...

    Here is what I think should win:

    Best Picture - Mystic River
    Best Actor - Sean Penn
    Best Actress - Naomi Watts
    Best Supporting Actor - Benecio Del Toro (This one is the closest to call, I would be happy if Robbins or Watanabe got it too.)
    Best Supporting Actress - Marcia Gay Harden
    Best Director - Clint Eastwood

    In a perfect world, 21 Grams would win Best Picture and Inarritu would win Best Director, but oh well.

    Last Samurai, Matchstick Men, and Big Fish were robbed of some nominations I think...

    I think anybody who thinks any actors from ROTK should have been nominated needs a serious reality check. There was acting in ROTK? I guess they deserve something for 'acting' like there was a decent script to read from. And being able to say their lines straight-faced.
     
  10. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611
    ha ha!

    my bad
     
  11. SaFe

    SaFe Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2000
    Messages:
    337
    Likes Received:
    7
    Geuss half the world will need a reality check then. Gee, that is some god-awful picks that I'm damn sure you wouln't put money on.
     
  12. Nomar

    Nomar Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2000
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    2
    I 'geuss' the Academy didn't need a reality check though.

    Which picks are god-awful. Have you even seen the other movies that got noms?

    You are right that I wouldn't put money against ROTK. I just think awarding achievement for three movies and three years at the Academy Awards is ridiuclous. It's just one movie that should be looked at. It's unfair for other movies.
     
  13. ZRB

    ZRB Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    6,818
    Likes Received:
    4
    And Lord of the Rings: Return of the King, stands alone as the best film of the year (and all time).
     
  14. Nomar

    Nomar Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2000
    Messages:
    4,429
    Likes Received:
    2
    Wow.

    And there it is.


    The best film of all time?

    Wow.

    I have no words.
     
  15. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    I'm sure when they do another AFI Best Films thing, ZRB's notions will prove true. Citizen Kane? Bah! The Third Man? Double Bah!
     
  16. oldman

    oldman Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Messages:
    488
    Likes Received:
    3
    yeah she did. i was surprised that she wasn't nominated for a golden globe though.
     

Share This Page