man there must be a low threshhold for humor up there in norman. that was actually fairly weak considering the statements weren't part of some acronym or something. at least put some thought into it and have each statement start with M A C K or T E X A S of L O S E R S or something. there's plenty of material/excuses/scores/names to use for such purposes. great recruits, no championships, oklahoma's b****? did a five year old come up with that, or a red raider? does it matter? you've got the upperhand, i would hope you can come up with something better for next time.
don't be so sensitive man. That was nothing, there are actually some pretty funny ones here: http://forums.hornfans.com/php/wwwt...2054240&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=
now see, that's what i'm talking about. there were some quality ones in that thread. the choking one was definitely great as were many of the others. i just don't see how the one posted here was funny at all unless i'm missing something about what the original poster says on it. i'm all about laughing at UT's misfortune's the last 3 years. it's about the only way to deal with them all.
How can you have an OU-Texas thread without this classic photo? Anybody can make a bunch of silly pictures with Photoshop, but this is so much more real:
It has been well documented that the individual in the photo that Sam posted is mentally challenged. I do volunteer work for mentally challenged children and these people have given me a great deal of perspective on life. It pains me greatly to see individuals making fun of these very innocent victims. These people do their best to make it in society and deserve to be treated with respect, despite the hand which life has dealt them. SamFisher, you disgust me.
Eh, I thought it was funny. That's all that matters to me. I guess I've always been a selfish b*stard that way. *shrugs*
When you lose 3 in a row to Stoops/OU, of course people will forget that UT beat up on Blake, who didn't beat up on OU back then? Once Stoops fully established himself at OU in his 2nd season, Mack has been in Stoops' rearview mirror.
A little premature to say that. How many passes has he thrown? Like 10? Nonetheless, I am a huge fan of his and once he can digest the offense, he should be the best player in the NCAA.
I don't know if you can believe anything/everything you read on the internet, but more than one poster (reputable) has said that Stoops called Darrell Royal about the job and Royal said "you don't have enough skins on the wall son." UT usually goes for former head coaches, not assistants. I know nothing of Mack asking Stoops to be his DC. If he had, we would have one at least two conference titles and stoops would probably be at OSU or some place like that.
God, could you imagine Stoops coaching all the talent mack brings in? that would just be ridiculous. shutouts left and right. still winning the big XII title game b/c by the time applewhite gets in we're only down like 7 or 10 instead of 19. beating ou every year. not losing to tech last year. man. i've always said we just need to pay spurrier, stoops, and brown however much they want to be a tri-coach. mack recruits everybody, spurrier of course runs the offense, and stoops runs the D. how could a stoops D ever give up more than a spurrier O scores with mack's talent or vice versa? can we raise about 12M a year to make it happen? just add it into student fees, no one will care. lets make use of that $100 advising fee i pay each semester to talk to a guy for 5 minutes and tell him which courses i'm taking.
