Whenever I hear men constantly complain about feminism and it's destruction of Western society, I immediately know that they are emotionally weak. Men, and especially white men have run of this world and have for thousands of years.
Hahah good one. We have been busy. Also, how does everyone know what I do on here? I think I mentioned it once. Wow word spreads. I actually may represent a party so I’m going to opt out of this one!
I would agree with the first part of your post; the rest, not so much. The problem with SJW-ism is that it is mostly a bunch of BS. And, anyone who advocates for "social justice" is surely not talking about reforming the family court and the police state. Proponents of SJW-ism are usually talking about how "unfair" it is for a group of people to get tossed out of Starbucks after sitting there for multiple hours without buying anything. Or something equivalent of that. The main thing here is for men to learn to not to enter "the system." The leading cause of divorce, and the ensuing shakedowns ordered by the government, is marriage.
You are essentially correct, but: she's nominally/officially a Republican. Which just goes to show: tradcons are the other feminists.
You're off your duffer. I don't want to track and stalk anyone; it's not worth my time. Now, is it appropriate that Judges get their face shown when they rule unjustly? You betcha. I don't like it when people get arrested, and then get their face plastered all over the internet, even before they are convicted of anything.....but if that type of thing is going to happen, then I don't see why this judge shouldn't get the same treatment. BTW, her photos were all over the net before this; that's how they were easy to find. Also btw: there's some type of LSU forum that has the same thread going on, with much the same comments I made; and someone there also posted her photo. I didn't have anything to do with that one. I'm not advocating violence toward anyone. I'm advocating awareness of who sits on judges thrones, and what horrible rulings they issue. The "payback" -- if there is any -- will happen at election time. But probably not even then. MoCo is in many ways the worst of the tradcon police state.
And whenever I hear some man dismiss men's concerns, and men's rights; and how gynocentric society has become -- I know I have encountered a cuck. And, if you want to go to the "back in the old days" card -- everybody was "oppressed." No one "had it easy." Yes, it was more patriarchal; but that's the natural order of things. Patriarchy does not mean oppression. Lastly, if you don't think Western society isn't disintegrating......I don't know what to say. I know you were in the thread about San Francisco and *&^% on the streets. That's just one example, but it's awfully telling.
You guys should lay off the O.P. this story did make the local news. The bigamy is obviously the issue. Why wouldn't the judge consider the bigamy. Wouldn't that void the marriage? Maybe they have to wait for a conviction
Dude, that is seriously deep. You needed to spoil that, so we all had a chance to put on our hip waders.
Posting an article about someone who was a bigamist wasn't the issue. The larger point the OP was trying to make with the story is why he is justifiably getting grief right now.
If I am going to expect historically repressed groups to not whine and act like victims, then I sure as hell am not going to tolerate the ruling patriarchy to whine and claim “it isn’t fair”. I am a white male, life is pretty damn good. We wrote the laws. Most the people in positions of power are white males. The social rules are by in large written by white males. If you b**** about “man rights” as a white male in the world we live in, then you are WEAK and ineffective. Look yourself in the mirror ask yourself why.
If you take a room full of white supremacists, they are always the last group you would choose to prove the "supremacy" of white people. If you take a room full of Proud Boys, they are the last group of men you would choose to make a case for the value patriarchal society. It's like they realize that they are the most marginal members of the group, so they try to claim privilege on the basis of their membership to that group, instead of standing on the value of their own (nonexistent) intrinsic individual worth.
Seems that this case is not over and it is unclear if the bigamy charges came before or after the initial settlement of $3k a month in support (he is saying a 2 year appeal will cost $75K) https://abc13.com/man-feels-betrayed-after-ex-wife-charged-with-bigamy/5496359/ Sounds like this story is being somewhat misrepresented here. Surprise surprise.
Always reminds me of the scene in Lethal Weapon 2 where Mel busts into the South African's office, sees the fat old guy and the funny looking enforcer guy and says "oh look, it's the master race".
It's like starting a game of Monopoly with hotels on 6 different properties and complaining that you have to wait for the others to roll as well.
