<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Houston just seems like the most logical choice for Dwight. No trade complications and he could win a title next year.</p>— Ethan Strauss (@SherwoodStrauss) <a href="https://twitter.com/SherwoodStrauss/statuses/352939496062451714">July 4, 2013</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
It just doesn't make sense from the Lakers and Dwight's positions. Dwight doesn't get the full max and still get hit with the Cali state tax. The Lakers take back salary for Harrison Barnes/Klay and help an in-state rival become a powerhouse.
No, I don't know a thing. But I know about tampering, and how there are very serious consequences. I'm just a fan, I don't act like I know any more than anyone else on here. But the physical thing is impossible, at least that's what I have been to believe by multiple NBA related subjects that say physicals cannot be conducted by a team that doesn't even have that player. I hope you and zcity are right, and he was here, but hopefully it wasn't a physical, or else that would be TAMPERING, and Morey is smarter than that.
Wow, this must be a really slow news day. And imagine, we have five more days of bull**** to come from these so called sports journalists. Just tweet wild speculation, heck, just make stuff up... And call it news.
Curry's a good, not great, PG on THAT team, but he's just a glorified SG in a brittle body. Oh, and also, go away. Thanks.
If the lakers do not sign and trade dwight, doesnt that mean warriors (if they somehow can manage to clear the cap space) are only able to offer the 4 year 88 million? That would mean he would be taking even less i would think, because he is staying in California
I can't stand cp3 as he tends to think he plays for club real madrid with his flopping, but much respect for knowing what he wanted and not doing this whole prancing around tomfoolery for attention. ** ** disregard if dwight signs here.