Mueller refutes Trump’s ‘no collusion, no obstruction’ line 'We focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.'
Now imagine the Trump voters that had to put up with all the tantrums and misinformation from mainstream media, it hit a nerve a riled up the base once again. It’s going to be a epic landslide for the GOP this November.
You are misinformed on this issue just like you were about separation of children. Both of your misconceptions come from the party line of Trump and Republicans. The Mueller investigation did not conclude that there was no collusion between Trump and Russia. It documented incidents and intent of collusion between them. I don't know if you are or are not a Trump supporter but you have bought into some of the lies told by Trump's team and believe they actually happened.
Check that last sentence. Are you that desperate that you're still clinging to the Mueller Report as proof that Trump is a Russian spy? This is the rhetoric that alienates me from the left. Let it go. There's an election coming.
Be prepared for a bunch a fake Democrats propping up Bernie. They got their marching orders... Look at all the conservatives on this forum... all of them all of sudden are concerned Bernie isn’t getting treated fair.
Apparently honesty over an anonymous forum isn’t in your DNA. I find these forums an interesting case in human psychology, like how weak and insecure most people be in order to have fake online personas?
you brought it up Ignorance is no friend, my friend “The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office. “We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added.
You need to stop with the Trump spin if you aren't a Trump supporter. Trump's team met with Russian agents in the hope that they could provide damaging information about his political opponent. That is collusion. They said they would work on easing sanctions for Russia. They did to that and attempted to do it even more. That is collusion. Whether or not it is criminally able to prosecute for those actions doesn't change those fact that those actions did definitely happen. Furthermore Trump lied about it and attempted to cover it up. It doesn't have to be a campaign issue, but it isn't okay to let people like you spread misinformation about it.
Actually, you missed the point of my post about the separation of children. I am fully aware that it was Trump's policy and not Obama's. I was stating an outrageous right 'talking point' in response to your left party line. The Mueller investigation did not conclude there was collusion. It stated there was insufficient evidence to bring charges. It was a 3 year investigation. Where the Muller team messed up was not hiring you. Because you've been able to state that without a doubt there was collusion.
Lol... So it didn’t amount to a “criminal conspiracy”? How does a technicality help your case? I mean Trump got to submit written answers , delete communications, and had key people refuse to talk.
One thing you have to give them, they are united in their message. I've already seen a lot of right wing posters and personalities play up the "DNC is rigged" narrative. They are trying to get voters angry at the DNC so that if Bernie doesn't win...which is still a possibility, still too early, that people will be angry enough to not vote for Biden, Pete, Amy, Bloomberg...and look how united they are in this messaging that it even passes down to people on the internet.
Wrong. The report documented specific incidents of collusion. They said collusion isn't a crime. That doesn't change Trump's team set up multiple meetings with Russian agents in an effort to exchange favors for Russia in an exchange for information damaging to his political opponent. That happened. The report documents and sites the evidence for it. Do you deny that happened? Do you believe that it happened, but think that kind of collaboration is okay? Do you believe that it happened, but object to the term 'collusion'?
If that alienates you from the left how can you look at the right after Benghazi, Emails, Fast and Furios?
