1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The Blazers are more talented than the Rockets

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Old Man Rock, Apr 27, 2009.

  1. SuperStar

    SuperStar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    70
    If Pryzbilla and Oden are two of the top centers in the league than the center position is a joke.


    Blazers are a horrendous defensive jump shooting team. Outside of Roy and Aldridge, they don't have much. Rudy Fernandez can shoot the 3 but that's about all he can do. Play defense Euros!
     
  2. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    Hey this is my Rocket team. I bleed red. I am proud of them. They are throwing it all on the floor. More than I magined they have. And let me be clear we have intangibles over them that make us better on the court. And one of those is just an outright desire to win. But talent wise I give the Blazers the edge. We were lucky to catch a newbie playoff team on opening night. We will never blow them out again. That being said I believe we will win this series. But I don't want to see them in Houston again.

    So perhaps I should have changed my title to The Blazers are more talented than us. Eiher way we will win this thing if we have to leave dead bodies on the court.
     
  3. dachuda86

    dachuda86 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    16,325
    Likes Received:
    3,586
    I think the rox will take one more on Portland. The team has its confidence now and will be looking to take care of business before this mess gets back to Houston.
     
  4. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    Don't just talk ****. Back it up. name me 10 centers better than them.
     
  5. kpsta

    kpsta Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2001
    Messages:
    2,654
    Likes Received:
    166
    Based off their performance against the Rockets, you really believe that Oden and Pryzbilla are both top ten centers?

    Most of Oden's points have come when Yao's out or off dribble penetration from Blake (when Yao had to rotate to stop Blake after Blake's man got beat). He's demonstrated that he can't create anything on offense... at all. When he gets the ball and tries to back Yao down, he gets stuffed, commits a turnover, or has to pass the ball out. On defense, he fouls constantly.

    Pryzbilla flops. He is definitely more polished offensively than Oden, but neither makes signifcant contributions - certainly nowhere close to what they might do against other teams. A good part of his rebounding comes from pushing off on Yao (and not getting called for it).

    (edits: because I know you'll be asking for evidence)

    If you're just talking about centers currently in the playoffs or guys who only ever play center and never log minutes as a forward, perhaps you could make that case. But to me, guys who log decent minutes at the centers better than they are in no particular order:

    Yao
    Dwight
    Shaq
    Gasol (F/C)
    Okur
    Horford (F/C)
    Duncan (F/C)
    Perkins
    Ilgauskus
    Jefferson (F/C - injured right now, but he'll be shredding either of them as soon as he's healthy again)
    Bargnani (F/C)
    Chandler

    Even Dampier (purely on his defensive contribution) is better than Oden. Oden's huge 15-point game in this series was in a blowout loss.
     
    #25 kpsta, Apr 27, 2009
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2009
  6. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,393
    Likes Received:
    9,322
    In this day and age, you only have to be 7 feet tall to be considered a "top 10 center" in the league.

    Seriously, Pryzbilla and Oden are just foul machines.

    But I get the OP's point. I didn't think we would have this much trouble with these guys, especially after Game 1. Frankly, we were lucky to win last night.

    And this series isn't over........
     
  7. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    Completely agreed. I've been saying that if I were a Blazers fan, I'd be pissed at the shot selection. Someone has to attack the basket for them if they want to stick around.

    They'll learn....but I think the Rox close this out in 5.
     
  8. baller4life315

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,691
    Likes Received:
    3,029
    I'll give the OP credit for going against the grain but I don't agree with this. At least for right now. Portland is simply too soft. Aside from Roy getting whatever he wants all they do is chuck jump shots. For a team that has the athletic advantage the way they do, they're playing right into our hands by doing that.

    What they need is a legitimate 20-10 post player (cough, Oden, cough). Aldridge is a good player but he doesn't play like a traditional PF. His game involves too many set mid-range shots, turnarounds and fadeways. He eventually might reach that 20-10 mark but I have a hard time considering him a legit post player. He plays too much like a tweener.

    Image how lethal they could be if Oden ever pans out. They would have one of the best wing players in the league (Roy), a legit 20-10 post player (Oden) to work it inside, a tweener scoring machine with size/athleticism (Aldridge) all surrounded by great shooters. That's a championship level team. They also could use a better PG, which is scary to think they may already have that guy waiting in the wings (Bayless). It goes without saying that Portland's future is bright and eventually they probably will be better than our Rockets. But not right now they're not.
     
  9. levintblack

    levintblack Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    94
    You really need to get educated.

    Aldridge is a good player but far from the best jump shooting PF in the game. Garnett immediately jumps to mind among many others. There are PF's that are only good for jump shooting. Guys like Joe Smith for instance.
     
  10. levintblack

    levintblack Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    94
    Ohh and the better team doesn't lose by 27 at home.
     
  11. vcchlw

    vcchlw Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    6,826
    Likes Received:
    1,056
    Yao Ming
    Dwight Howard
    Al Jefferson
    Andrew Bynum (not to mention Paul Gasol plays C during his absence)
    Shaq
    Brad Miller
    Deke
    Marcus Camby
    Nene
    Kendrick Perkins
    David Lee
    Spencer Hawkes
    Marc Gasol
    Emeka Okafor
    ....
     
  12. vcchlw

    vcchlw Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    6,826
    Likes Received:
    1,056
    ^ Almost forgotten the Caveman.
     
  13. DCkid

    DCkid Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    9,660
    Likes Received:
    2,704
    The thing is after about the top few centers in the league there is a huge gap, and then the gap is so small between the remaining centers, it doesn't even really matter that much.
     
  14. Northside Storm

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    11,262
    Likes Received:
    450
    Ten centers better then Oden or Pryz?

    uh

    Jefferson
    Duncan
    Dwight
    Yao
    Shaq
    Chandler
    Dalembert
    Kaman
    Camby
    Bogut
    Okafor
    Bynum
    Biedrins
    Nene
    Jermaine O'Neal
    Brook Lopez
    Pau Gasol
    Marc Gasol
    Okur
    Perkins
    Big Z
    Brad Miller
    Horford
    Bargnani

    ...Even if you eliminate the PF/C hybrids like Pau, Big Al and Duncan, that still leaves like 20 names.
     
  15. arno_ed

    arno_ed Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    8,023
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Good point. I keep reading/hearing that the blazers have more talent than we have. But that is just not true, what they have is more athleticism, but that alone does not make you a good basketbal player, or a very talented one (Stromile Swift anyone).

    People often mistake athleticism for talent. Having a BBQ IQ is also talent, having a good jumper is also talent, being able to stay in front of your man on defense is also talent (quick footwork). Ofcourse you have to train to maxamize your talent. But in general Athleticism alone does not equal talent.

    Portland does have a more atheltic team than we do, but not a more talented.
     
    1 person likes this.
  16. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    Have you watched the last 3 games. They beat us pretty handily in Portland and then made the last 2 in Houston barnburners. They were leading by 6 at the 4th. The only reason we pulled it out was for Lowry incredible rebounding and a miracle defensive stop by chuck. I thought we were just better than them before the season started but I don't believe that anymore. We are a very evenly matched team but Brandon roy gives them a slight edge on talent.

    We are winning more by desire and heart than by talent. We are leaving more on the court. I don't care about the last 7 games. the last 3 games have been won by heart. If we slack just a bit on effort we lose. That is my point we are out hustling them, that and the fact that we must continue and even escalate it if we want to win in Portland. And we want to win in Portland because this Blazers team with a little hope might actually come alive. And I don't care how we beat them let's just beat them on tuesday.
     
  17. thegary

    thegary Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,006
    Likes Received:
    3,128
    disagree completely. the blazers are showing strong desire and besides game one have shown no first time jitters. they are playing hard, we have just made a few more plays than them in the two close wins. also, i predict that if brooks steps up in game five, we win big.
     
  18. SuperStar

    SuperStar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    70
    1)Dwight Howard
    2)Yao Ming
    3)Pau Gasol
    4)Andrew Bynum
    5)Shaq
    6)Tim Duncan
    7)Chris Caveman
    8)Big Z
    9)Marcus Camby
    10)Al Hardford
    Even add a bonus one
    11)Eric Dampier
     
  19. ThaShark316_28

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,012
    Likes Received:
    130
    Lemme see...

    Yao
    Howard
    Shaq
    Kaman
    Bynum
    Dalembert
    Perkins
    Nene
    Okur
    Ilgauskas
    Jefferson
    Biedrins
    Bogut

    That's 13.

    Oden has a shot to be above all of them except maybe Yao and Howard.
     
  20. Old Man Rock

    Old Man Rock Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,157
    Likes Received:
    518
    I am not saying they are more athletic although they are. I am so Brandon Roy and Adridge are better than Battier/Artest and Yao. Their 2 top players are better than ours. Roy is a top 5 player. But Scola is smarter than Aldridge and plays for his life out there. And so does Lowry. I know this is my opinion but the fact is as hard as we are playing and given are xperience if we were more talented we would be killing this team at home. We are not that talented but what we have fortitude and desire. And that makes me very proud of this team.
     

Share This Page