1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

The 2, the 3, and the 5. wtf?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by getbloodyred, Jan 9, 2012.

  1. getbloodyred

    getbloodyred Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,423
    Likes Received:
    281
    Martin is just bad on defense. and guess what, so far he's been bad on offense as well. what is going on with Martin, I am seriously concerned for that guy. I want to trade him, but his trade value is plummenting because of his recent performances. *sigh* missing open 3's. not getting to the foul line. i'm done with this guy, i'm sorry.

    Budinger can't do anything besides his the 3 pointer from the corner. besides that he has been a liability in all other aspects of the game especially on defense. why is this guy starting? on a championship team he would be a third stringer.

    Jordan Hill. I'm not ever going to say anything. simply, the guy should not be starting. same for him, on a championship team he would a third stringer.

    My Resolve. GET RID OF THESE GUYS FOR DRAFT PICKS. for the rest of the season, this should be our starting lineup

    lowry
    lee
    williams(or parsons, who has been doing very well)
    scola
    dalembert

    this is a very good defensive starting 5 btw. which is something we need!, lowry, lee, williams/parsons, and dalembert are very cabable on that end of the floor.
     
  2. TriCkz

    TriCkz Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,488
    Likes Received:
    30
    Fyi hill and bud are no longer starting
     
  3. CaptainRox

    CaptainRox Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    34
    Martin is butt hurt, his coach is gone, he was almost traded and now there's officiating which takes away some of his game (specifically his ability to draw fouls from that Reggie miller like sweep through motion sorry don't know the technical name)

    Right now, all we can do is play it out. We don't have assets to trade, dint have too much cap room or money so it looks like we have to wait and draft for the future.
     
  4. getbloodyred

    getbloodyred Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,423
    Likes Received:
    281
    oh my bad. i wasn't able to watch the 2nd thunder game. well regardless, these guys just make me mad lol
     
  5. val_modus

    val_modus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,792
    Likes Received:
    289
    You just seem frustrated and you should be. Martin is a more than capable scorer who is going through a shooters slump which happens to the best of them. When you dont knock down open shots, it will affect other parts of your game aswell, like getting to the hole. He has his deficiencies on defense, but he is in all respect a perfect 2nd or 3rd guy on an elite team. As for Budinger, the guy can't play a lick of defense, but dont take away from other parts of his game.. he is an excellent shooter from mid and three range, one of the best on the fast break, and a pretty solid slasher when aggresive. Hill i agree with you on, the guy is a joke. My point is that all of these guys (except Hill) are solid players, and capable starters, but are playing out of their roles, hopefully Morey can give this team what it ultimately needs: direction.
     
  6. DreamShook

    DreamShook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    70,833
    Likes Received:
    114,842
    I think "Bulls**t" is the technical name for that maneuver. "Man wtf is that s**t" and "Not this s**t again" are also acceptable.
     
  7. getbloodyred

    getbloodyred Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,423
    Likes Received:
    281
    ya i guess i should give budinger some more cred. but i just don't really believe he is as a good a player as everybody says he is. i think williams is better, and with the right development i think parsons will be better than him as well. i liked chase A LOT MORE when he was coming off the bench.
     
  8. RocketsRed14

    RocketsRed14 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,821
    Likes Received:
    223
    Hill has it worse than martin and budinger. The guy is being forced to play center because he is the 3rd tallest player on the team, but is better than one of the people taller than him(thabeet) AND is starting because Dalembert isn't starting until he was at least 75-80% in shape(2nd thunder game).While playing center, he get abused because he doesn't have the strength to hold down the true centers of the league. Basically, if you put the guy back at his natural PF position there is a higher chance he will be a "solid player" or a "capable starter" and he is the ONLY guy of the three who is playing out of position. IMO, when put back at the 4 and given consistent minutes, he has the potential to be a double double guy.
     
  9. Xsatyr

    Xsatyr Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,413
    Likes Received:
    158
    Original thread.
     
  10. val_modus

    val_modus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,792
    Likes Received:
    289
    Completely agreed. Chase is a perfect burst of energy for the 2nd unit, but he just doesn't have all the tools (like Williams and perhaps Parsons) to be a starter on a team that desperately needs a playmaker at the forward position.
     
  11. UTAllTheWay

    UTAllTheWay Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,859
    Likes Received:
    2,316
    This "sweep through motion" thing is so freaking overblown. Martin hardly ever did it. He got maybe 2-4 free throws out of it every 4 games.
     
  12. SF3isBack!!

    SF3isBack!! Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    10,163
    Likes Received:
    1,879
    Bull thinks that Chase has an awesome set of tools.
     
  13. Corrosion

    Corrosion Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8,950
    Likes Received:
    11,415
    I posted something very similar in another thread Saturday .... The one change i would make is that I want to see Twill at the SG not the SF. His size there is an advantage rather than a disadvantage in facing 6'8"-6'10" guy's each night at the SF spot.

    My condensed rotation would look something like the following -

    Lowry/Dragic
    Lee/Twill
    Parsons/Morris
    Scola/Patterson
    Dalembert/Patterson

    If you cuold move Martin , Budinger , Flynn , Thabeet and get a servicable big in return I'd call it a win.

    That lineup is considerably better rebounding and defensively than what they started the season with. It might be a good enough rotation to be better than 9th in the western conference .... Or it might be bad enough to sink them to the early lottery (which I think they are headed anyway).

    Under that scenario you at least get to see what these guy's are capable rather than the same old 9th in the west pick 14th and get no better migraine headache we've had as fans for the past few seasons.


    Aw hell , what am I talkin about , Stern would just screw us over somehow ....
     
  14. RedStaag

    RedStaag Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Likes Received:
    16
    I honestly don't know why people are so quick to include Martin in every proposed trade. He is the only proven 20+ ppg scorer we have. But he sucks on defense- when has that been an issue for star players in the NBA.

    Most NBA top scorers except for kobe, lebron and a select few save their energy on defense and use it on offense. Case in point, Battier having to guard T-Mac's man and his own man hahahaha- well you get the point im tryng to make.

    The problem with the team however is that the sf (Bud) and pf(scola) playing with Martin are also defensive liabilities. But i would rather get rid of scola and budinger or put them on the bench than touch Martin. Or start C.Lee/T-Will at SF and someone else not named scola or Hill on pf
     
  15. FTW Rockets FTW

    FTW Rockets FTW Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,724
    Likes Received:
    21,397
    Martin is an elite offensive player and without him we would find it difficult to outscore opponents
     
  16. thething

    thething Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,621
    Likes Received:
    261
    fixed
     
  17. Dreamin

    Dreamin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    63
    Both Hayes and Landry were free agents. I would much rather have Hayes and Landry at the 4 then Scola and Pat. Start Hayes and let Landry destroy off the bench.
     
  18. Corrosion

    Corrosion Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    8,950
    Likes Received:
    11,415
    So is Scola for what its worth .... He's shooting 55% from the field so far and should get a lot more touches yet every game it seems they go away from him after a hot start ..... He should touch the ball on the low block on every trip down the floor.

    C.Lee isnt far from Martin offensively and is far superior defensively.


    You cant have Martin , Budinger and Scola on the floor at the same time and expect to stop anyone or rebound at a reasonable rate.
     
  19. RedStaag

    RedStaag Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Likes Received:
    16
    C.Lee is very very far from Martin offensively. Otherwise, i agree with every you said
     
  20. JMAD21

    JMAD21 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    4,285
    Likes Received:
    866
    Twill and Dal sarting? I didn't watch the last game.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now