Serious question: Why not Michael Vick? He can get it done through the air and on the ground. Is it because the whole dog fighting scandal?
Pretty much a repost from another thread. I've supported Schaub the whole way through. I think it's over now. This is not a knee jerk on my part, I've wanted to see Schaub when it mattered most. I don't believe he has the tools, mindset or edge to win big. Kubiak is loyal to a fault sometimes. Trade him or let him go but, not before you find a replacement. I think we need someone much more mobile, keeps the D honest.
Yes, but you can't put TOs on the offensive line. Vick has very poor judgement throwing the ball and terrible pocket sense which is the main reason for the TOs. IMO, the concussions have taken a toll on him.
They should consider Vick. If he's the guy they bring in, let him compete with Schaub. I wouldn't just hand the keys to a player that might flame and burn.
vick is only a year older than matt. hes far from done, hes taken a beating in philly. this system can add some years to his legs.. this is a QB friendly system.. the sooner you guys accept this the better off you will be..
Give me Matt Schaub over all these mofos, Draft a mean RT and RG and we should be good. It starts with the Oline and Your only as good as your offensive line is, ask Arian Foster.
You think Schaub is made of glass? Vick is the same way, and creates too many turnovers. It's time to draft a quarterback early. Not 2013, but 2014.