Obvious fact would be something like Flacco has 1 super bowl ring Schaub has 0 super bowl rings. Obvious fact would be something like Flacco has NFL post seasons records for Wins by a QB in first 80 regular season starts – 54 Combined regular/postseason wins in first 3 years as QB – 36 (with Dan Marino) Only QB to start/win a playoff game in each of his first 5 seasons Road playoff wins by a QB – 6 Passing TDs in a postseason – 11 (with Joe Montana & Kurt Warner) Passing TDs in a postseason without interception – 11 (with Joe Montana) First QB to have a passer rating over 100 in all four games of a single postseason Consecutive playoff games with 3 passing TDs – 3 (with Bernie Kosar, Kurt Warner & Aaron Rodgers) Joe Flacco Baltimore Ravens Franchise Records Wins by a QB in first 80 regular season starts – 54 Combined regular/postseason wins in first 3 years as QB – 36 (with Dan Marino) Only QB to start/win a playoff game in each of his first 5 seasons Road playoff wins by a QB – 6 Passing TDs in a postseason – 11 (with Joe Montana & Kurt Warner) Passing TDs in a postseason without interception – 11 (with Joe Montana) First QB to have a passer rating over 100 in all four games of a single postseason Consecutive playoff games with 3 passing TDs – 3 (with Bernie Kosar, Kurt Warner & Aaron Rodgers) Then we also have Flacco - 8 playoff wins Schaub - 1 Then again, Schaub is obviously better than flacco.. oh yeah, Derek Carr is already pushing to take his job in oakland.
This isn't about Schaub, at this point Schaub is no good....but Flacco has never been any good. Anyway, stick to your "winz" nonsense, it helped out back when you were a Tebow fan, or a Mark Sanchez fan, or a Vince Young fan or any other garbage QB that you justify by team accomplishment.
Not this Flacco debate again. Flacco at his best > Schaub at his best Flacco at his worst < Schaub a his worst
So how come Schaub suxks in the playoffs and Flacco doesn't...??? When the lights are on (playoffs) _ just like Eli, Flacco steps up and Schaub F's up. Flacco out played Brady "IN THE PLAYOFFS" two years in a row. What did Schaub do...???
You would think after last year the debate would be over, Flacco performed worse than Schaub and Keenum did for the Texans yet for some reason the "just winz" squad still loves him. Also, Schaub at his best was WAY better than Flacco at his best especially when you consider that Flacco has only been "at his best" for a handful of games in his entire career and at no point was he ever as good as Schaub's 2009 season.
Flacco isn't the type of quarterback people draft on their fantasy team so many only pay attention to his regular season numbers and not what he did in the playoffs the past few times they made it. They don't even pay attention to the fact that Baltimore had one of the hardest super bowl runs ever and Flacco put up better numbers than what Brees and Rodgers put up during their super bowl run facing less difficult competition. If people pay more attention to the playoffs (which is what really counts) than the regular season _ they wouldn't compare Flacco to guys like Tebow, Sanchez, Schaub, etc. Hopefully Savage or Case can be the quarterback that can step up when the team needs him to. If not, the Texans will have a good shot at getting one in next year's draft.
Well, Ray Rice was garbage last season so they had no running game. They didn't have Boldin and Pitta was injured and missed a lot of games. And I believe Jacoby got banged up as well. Flacco hardly had anyone to throw to with no running game. Funny how those excuses can be used for Schaub and Case and not Flacco. And Bobby brings up 2009. A prime example of when I say people pay more attention to the regular season than the playoffs. And the Texans defense was trash in 2009. Schaub got a lot of his numbers in the 2nd half when teams were slacking off and playing prevent defense.
Nah, that's not crazy. Weird maybe but not crazy. Crazy would be to blame this on Bud Adams when we all know that HE is solely responsible for global warming.
I'm absolutely open to changing opinions, but it takes legitimate arguments for there to be a reason for me to. The whole "just win" BS shouldn't be enough to convince anyone of anything. Anyone who comes with that Skip Bayless nonsense won't get too far.
